4.51.8 Compliance Assurance Process (CAP) 4.51.8.1 Program Scope and Objectives 4.51.8.1.1 Background and Authority 4.51.8.1.2 Responsibilities 4.51.8.1.3 Program Management and Review 4.51.8.1.4 Program Controls 4.51.8.1.5 Terms/Definitions/Acronyms 4.51.8.1.6 Related Resources 4.51.8.2 The Three Phases of the Program 4.51.8.3 The CAP Phase 4.51.8.3.1 Eligibility and Suitability Criteria 4.51.8.3.2 Application and Selection Process 4.51.8.3.3 Issue Identification Process 4.51.8.3.4 Issue Development Process 4.51.8.3.5 Issue Resolution Process 4.51.8.3.6 Post-Filing Representation 4.51.8.3.7 Post-Filing Full and Partial Acceptance Letters 4.51.8.3.8 Post-Filing Review 4.51.8.3.9 Miscellaneous 4.51.8.3.10 Credit for Increasing Research Activities and Amortization of Research and Experimental Expenditures 4.51.8.3.11 Transfer Pricing Transactions 4.51.8.3.12 Advance Pricing Agreements 4.51.8.4 Compliance Maintenance Phase 4.51.8.5 Bridge Phase 4.51.8.6 Terminations or Withdrawals 4.51.8.7 Claims 4.51.8.8 Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) Review 4.51.8.9 Transition Rule Part 4. Examining Process Chapter 51. LB&I Case Management Section 8. Compliance Assurance Process (CAP) 4.51.8 Compliance Assurance Process (CAP) Manual Transmittal September 07, 2023 Purpose (1) This transmits revised IRM 4.51.8, LB&I Case Management, Compliance Assurance Process (CAP). Material Changes (1) IRM 4.51.8.1, Program Scope has been updated as follows: Renamed "Program Scope and Objectives" per IRM 1.11.2.2.5. Moved “Program Goals” to a new paragraph under Purpose. Changed Policy Owner and Program Owner from Eastern Compliance Practice Area to ADCCI. (2) Updated list of CAP program announcements in IRM 4.51.8.1.2, Background and Authority. (3) Added new subsections for Program Management and Review and Program Controls. (4) Removed the 2017 IRC 965 exception from the list of exceptions in paragraph (2) of IRM 4.51.8.3.1, Eligibility and Suitability Criteria. (5) Clarified eligibility criteria for new CAP taxpayers under examination in paragraph (3) of IRM 4.51.8.3.1. (6) Added references to CAP MOU in IRM 4.51.8.3.3, Issue Identification Process. (7) Added information about when to make Joint Committee referrals on CAP cases and added reference to Joint Committee IRM 4.36.3 to IRM 4.51.8.8, Joint Committee on Taxation Review. (8) Editorial changes have been made throughout. Effect on Other Documents IRM 4.51.8 dated April 16, 2020 is superseded. Audience LB&I personnel Effective Date (09-07-2023) Theodore D. Setzer Assistant Deputy Commissioner Compliance Integration Large Business and International Division 4.51.8.1 (09-07-2023) Program Scope and Objectives Purpose: The Compliance Assurance Process (CAP) is a method of identifying and resolving tax issues through open, cooperative and transparent interaction between the IRS and LB&I taxpayers prior to the filing of a return. Through the CAP, the taxpayer should achieve tax certainty sooner and with less administrative burden than conventional examinations. The CAP seeks to identify, develop and resolve the material issues before the return is filed. It relies on the transparent and cooperative interaction of the parties and the contemporaneous exchange of information. The CAP does not provide taxpayers with guidance on, or resolution of, prospective or incomplete transactions outside of existing procedures. The goals of the CAP program include: Improve tax compliance by enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of the issue identification, development, and resolution processes and procedures; Increase transparency and cooperation between the IRS and taxpayers; and Reduce burden of tax administration and compliance. Audience: The primary users are LB&I employees. Policy Owner: Assistant Deputy Commissioner Compliance Integration (ADCCI), LB&I Division. Program Owner: Strategy, Policy and Governance within the ADCCI organization. Primary Stakeholders: The primary stakeholders are LB&I employees and taxpayers who participate in the program. 4.51.8.1.1 (09-07-2023) Background and Authority On December 12, 2005, the IRS announced that it was initiating the CAP pilot for large business taxpayers. The objective of this pilot was "to reduce taxpayer burden and uncertainty while assuring the Service of the accuracy of tax returns prior to filing, thereby reducing or eliminating the need for post-filing examinations." See Announcement 2005-87, 2005-50 IRB 1144. Subsequent announcements about the CAP program are listed here to document the history of the program: On March 31, 2011, the IRS announced that the six-year old CAP pilot for large business taxpayers was being made permanent and expanded to include the Compliance Maintenance phase. See News Release IR-2011-32. On August 29, 2016, the IRS announced that it was considering changes to its CAP program and that no new taxpayers would be accepted for the 2017 application period. See News Release IR-2016-384. On August 28, 2018, the IRS announced changes to its recalibrated CAP program for the 2019 CAP year and that new taxpayers may be accepted for the 2020 CAP year. See News Release IR-2018-174. On May 16, 2019, the IRS announced that new large corporate taxpayers interested in participating in the CAP program may apply for the 2020 CAP year. See News Release IR-2019-95 On August 27, 2020, the IRS announced the opening of the application period for the 2021 CAP program. See News Release IR-2020-193. On September 15, 2022, the IRS announced the opening of the application period for the 2023 CAP program. See News Release IR-2022-158. 4.51.8.1.2 (04-16-2020) Responsibilities See IRM 4.46.1.1.3, General Information and Definitions, Roles and Responsibilities. 4.51.8.1.3 (04-16-2020) Program Management and Review The CAP program tracks and captures CAP case data from the geographic practice areas on a monthly basis in two reports. The reports (CAP Summary and CAP Measures) are provided to Portfolio Management. 4.51.8.1.4 (09-07-2023) Program Controls The CAP program uses the LB&I CAP Application and Recommendation Tracking System (CAP Tracking System) to provide consistency to the application and recommendation process. The CAP Tracking System maintains a record of current and historical taxpayers in the CAP program, the required application, and the risking forms. The CAP Tracking System is also used to maintain updated taxpayer and IRS contact information. 4.51.8.1.5 (04-16-2020) Terms/Definitions/Acronyms Commonly used acronyms are listed below. Acronym Definition AC Account Coordinator APA Advance Pricing Agreement APMA Advance Pricing and Mutual Agreement CAP Compliance Assurance Process CRCQ CAP Research Credit Questionnaire DFO Director of Field Operations FTS Fast Track Settlement IRA Issue Resolution Agreement JCT Joint Committee on Taxation MITT Material Intercompany Transactions Template MOU Memorandum of Understanding PFA Pre-Filing Agreement RT Research Risk Review Team TAIT Treaty Assistance and Interpretation Team TPRA Transfer Pricing Risk Assessment 4.51.8.1.6 (04-16-2020) Related Resources See https://www.irs.gov/businesses/corporations/compliance-assurance-process for application forms, FAQs and additional information. 4.51.8.2 (04-16-2020) The Three Phases of the Program The Program consists of three phases: CAP, Compliance Maintenance and Bridge. In the CAP phase, a taxpayer is expected to make open, comprehensive and contemporaneous disclosures of its material issues in writing. The taxpayer is also expected to provide a full description of its material issues to include the relevant facts and circumstances and the proposed tax positions. If, after the receipt and review of the Post-Filing Representation, the IRS determines that all material issues have been disclosed and resolved the taxpayer will receive a Full Acceptance Letter. This letter constitutes written confirmation that, subject to the completion of the post-filing review of the return, the IRS will accept the return as filed. Any material issues that were not disclosed or resolved and any resolved issues that were not reported as agreed before the return is filed may be resolved through the post-filing examination process. A taxpayer with a limited number of material issues, that continues to satisfy the CAP eligibility and suitability requirements, and has completed at least one complete CAP phase, may progress, if approved, to the Compliance Maintenance phase. In the Compliance Maintenance phase, the IRS reduces the level of review based on the complexity and number of issues, and the taxpayer’s history of cooperation and transparency in the CAP. As with the CAP phase, a taxpayer is expected to make open, comprehensive, and contemporaneous disclosures of its material issues in writing. If, after the receipt and review of the Post-Filing Representation, the IRS determines that all material issues have been disclosed and resolved the taxpayer will receive a Full Acceptance Letter. Any material issues that were not disclosed or resolved and any resolved issues that were not reported as agreed before the return is filed may be resolved through the post-filing examination process. A taxpayer with few, if any, material issues, that continues to satisfy the CAP eligibility and suitability requirements, and has completed at least one complete Compliance Maintenance phase (or at least one complete CAP phase when in the best interest of sound tax administration), may progress, if approved, to the Bridge phase. In the Bridge phase, the IRS will not accept any disclosures, conduct any reviews or provide any assurances regarding the bridged return. If the taxpayer has a specific issue on the bridged return that it wants the IRS to consider, the taxpayer may submit a request for a pre-filing agreement (PFA) provided that the issue meets the requirements for a PFA. A taxpayer may withdraw from any phase of the CAP by submitting a written request. Additionally, the IRS may terminate a taxpayer’s participation in any phase when the taxpayer fails to adhere to the terms of the CAP Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). 4.51.8.3 (04-16-2020) The CAP Phase The CAP phase employs real-time issue resolution to improve tax compliance. The IRS and taxpayer work together to achieve this goal by identifying, developing and resolving the material issues prior to the filing of the return. A successful conclusion of the CAP allows the IRS to achieve an acceptable level of assurance regarding the accuracy of the taxpayer’s filed return and to substantially shorten the length of any post-filing examination. 4.51.8.3.1 (09-07-2023) Eligibility and Suitability Criteria To be eligible for participation in the CAP program, a taxpayer must meet the following criteria: Have assets of $10 million or more; Be a U.S. publicly traded corporation with a legal requirement to prepare and submit Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K to the Securities & Exchange Commission, or a grandfathered non-U.S. publicly traded entity that was accepted into the 2019 CAP program and has agreed to provide the IRS with unaudited quarterly financial statements and audited annual financial statements for the entity that was accepted into the Program. (These financial statements must be prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.); Not be under investigation by, or in litigation with, the IRS or other government agency that would limit the IRS’ access to current corporate tax records; and If currently under examination, must not have more than one open filed return and one open unfiled return on the first day of the applicant’s CAP year. A return is treated as closed for purposes of the open return criterion if it has been "closed in examination" with Status Code 90 or qualifies for one or more of the following exceptions: Previously Closed Exception: Any previously closed return with Status Code 90 that has been reopened to process a claim or other adjustment; LB&I Suspense Exception: Any return that has been placed in LB&I Suspense for a Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) Linkage with Status Code 14, or for an Advance Pricing Agreement, Competent Authority Assistance, or Fast Track Settlement with Status Code 15; National Office Exception: Any return that is waiting for the National Office to issue published guidance or a ruling, such as Chief Counsel Advice, Private Letter Ruling, or Change in Accounting Method review; Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) Review Exception: Any return that has been sent to the JCT for review with Project Code 0077 and ARC 027; Closed from Group Exception: Any return that has been closed from group and sent to Technical Services with Status Code 20 to 39, Centralized Case Processing with Status Code 50-59, or Appeals with Status Code 80-89. All new CAP taxpayers under examination can have no more than three tax years open for examination on the first day of the taxpayer's CAP year and all parties concur that these open years must close from the examination group no later than 12 months after the first day of the taxpayer’s CAP year. For all new taxpayers, any unexamined return with an open statute will be risk assessed as part of the required compliance check for the first CAP year. If the examination team determines that a material issue should be examined, the return with that issue may be placed under examination. Any unexamined returns that are placed under examination will be treated as "one filed" return for purposes of the return criterion. These returns must be closed by the end of the second CAP year or the taxpayer may not be eligible to participate in future CAP years. Because the CAP program is based on the transparent and cooperative interaction between the taxpayer and the IRS, a taxpayer that does not exhibit this type of behavior is not suitable for the CAP. Examples of significant or material failures to exhibit transparent and cooperative behavior include, but are not limited to: Not adhering to IDR response times or providing incomplete IDR responses; Not engaging in meaningful or good faith issue resolution discussions; Failing to thoroughly disclose a material issue in a timely manner; Failing to disclose a tax shelter or listed transaction; Failing to disclose an investigation or litigation that limits IRS access to current corporate records; Frequently filing claims or requesting appeals; and Not adhering to the terms of the CAP MOU. 4.51.8.3.2 (04-16-2020) Application and Selection Process A taxpayer interested in participating in the CAP program that meets the eligibility and suitability criteria must complete the CAP application form and any related documents for acceptance into the CAP. The application must be submitted annually during the application period immediately preceding the CAP year. The application period is generally from September 1st to October 31st but may be subject to change on a year-to-year basis. The application period for each year will be announced in advance of the application period opening. The application is available on IRS.gov and should be submitted by one of the following methods: If a taxpayer is a returning CAP applicant, submit the application to the account coordinator (AC) or case manager. If the taxpayer is a new CAP applicant, email the application to lbi.irs.cap.program@irs.gov. Enter "CAP Application" and the tax year in the subject line. The CAP team members assigned to the taxpayer will evaluate the application to determine if the taxpayer meets the eligibility and suitability criteria and will forward a recommendation to the LB&I Geographic Compliance Practice Area director with jurisdiction over the taxpayer. In evaluating an application, the IRS will consider factors such as: Number of open examinations Number and complexity of issues worked in prior examinations Level of cooperation and transparency in prior examinations Adherence to the terms of the CAP MOU in prior CAP years Effectiveness of internal controls Occurrence of an ownership change or a financial restatement Availability of IRS and taxpayer resources If a taxpayer’s application is approved by the IRS, the taxpayer will be notified, in writing, by the territory manager assigned to the taxpayer, that it was accepted into the CAP program and selected for one of the three phases of the CAP. After receiving the Notification of Acceptance Letter, the taxpayer must execute a standardized CAP MOU that outlines the CAP requirements and establishes the agreement to meet the requirements. The MOU must be executed by the taxpayer and returned to the AC by the requested date to secure its participation in the CAP program. Once the MOU is executed by the IRS and taxpayer, the taxpayer will be accepted into the CAP program. Note: The CAP MOU is applicable to a single tax year, known as the CAP year. A new MOU is executed for each CAP year. To continue in the CAP program, a taxpayer must reapply, be accepted and execute a new MOU for the CAP year. The IRS, in its sole discretion, may decline to approve a taxpayer’s application whenever warranted by the facts and circumstances of the application or in the interest of sound tax administration. If a taxpayer’s application is not approved by the IRS, the taxpayer will be informed, in writing, by the territory manager assigned to the taxpayer, that it was not accepted into the CAP program and the reason or reasons why it was not accepted. Adherence to the processes and procedures established by the CAP MOU is an integral part of identifying, developing and resolving issues, and assuring the IRS of the accuracy of the return. Failure to comply with the terms of the MOU will result in removal of the taxpayer from the CAP program. Once a taxpayer is accepted into the CAP program, the IRS will assign an AC to the taxpayer. The AC serves as the primary IRS representative, facilitates tax compliance and provides a single point of contact for all federal tax matters. The IRS will also provide a list of additional IRS participants on the CAP team to the taxpayer. The IRS team members will include, but may not be limited to, the team manager, the territory manager and the director of field operations (DFO). Similarly, the taxpayer must provide a list of designated personnel to act as points of contact for gathering information, answering questions and resolving issues. 4.51.8.3.3 (09-07-2023) Issue Identification Process The taxpayer is expected to make open, comprehensive and contemporaneous disclosures of the material issues. A material issue is defined as any recurring or repeating issue that has a change exceeding the materiality threshold, any new issue that exceeds the materiality threshold, or any other issue that is required to be reserved or reported on Schedule UTP. An issue is defined as a completed business transaction, an item, a change in accounting method or any other issue with material tax impact. To be considered comprehensive, the material issue must be disclosed in writing and the full disclosure must include the historic facts, surrounding circumstances and proposed tax position to include the law relied upon to develop the position. To be considered contemporaneous, the material issue must be disclosed within 30 days of the transaction being completed or the non-transaction issue having an impact on the taxpayer’s federal income tax liability. To allow sufficient time for issue resolution in pre-filing, the latest date for the taxpayer to submit disclosures is 90 days after the end of the tax year. Disclosures received after this date will be accepted but may not be reviewed in pre-filing. The AC will maintain an issues list which contains the material issues disclosed by the taxpayer or identified by the IRS that will be reviewed by the IRS. Any disputes regarding which material issues will be included on the issues list will be elevated to the territory manager. However, the ultimate decision regarding which material issues will be reviewed remains within the discretion of the IRS. The taxpayer will submit an initial issues list with the CAP application. By the date of the opening conference, the parties will jointly determine which material issues will be included on the initial issue list. Additional material issues may be added to the issues list during the CAP year by taxpayer disclosure or IRS identification, but may only be added with the approval of the territory manager. If issues are added to the issues list without consultation with the taxpayer, the taxpayer should elevate this situation to the DFO. The parties will jointly determine the scope of the CAP review by setting materiality thresholds that are used as a guide by the parties to determine which issues should be disclosed and reviewed as per the applicable CAP MOU. The parties will openly discuss situations where exceptions to the materiality thresholds may be warranted. However, the ultimate decision of identifying issues remains within the discretion of the IRS. Materiality thresholds are used in the CAP for the taxpayer to know which issues should be disclosed. They are not relevant to the adjustments that may be made regarding the tax consequences of such issues. Therefore, adjustments to issues may be made that are below the relevant materiality thresholds. Further, materiality thresholds may be reconsidered during the CAP year. The thresholds will be documented in the CAP Plan and apply only to the relevant CAP year. The CAP Plan will be discussed during the opening conference and a copy provided to the taxpayer at this time or shortly thereafter. Notwithstanding the materiality thresholds and issue identification process discussed above, the IRS may consider the following items for compliance review regardless of when or how they are identified: Tax shelters Listed transactions Transactions of interest Fraudulent items LB&I compliance initiatives LB&I directives Emerging issues In addition, obvious computational/mathematical or accounting errors/omissions that are not technical or legal in nature may be corrected. 4.51.8.3.4 (04-16-2020) Issue Development Process Taxpayers will provide information and documentation proactively and as requested by the AC and other team members. The team will promptly review all relevant information provided and will communicate to the taxpayer whether: Additional information is required. The IRS disagrees with the taxpayer’s proposed tax treatment. The proposed tax treatment is appropriate. Taxpayers will provide the IRS with: Industry overviews Current legal, accounting and tax organizational charts reflecting all related entities and the flow of relevant information involving those entities Financial performance information Information on any anticipated significant events that will affect the reporting for the tax year Necessary resources for disclosure of requested information Taxpayers will provide the AC with tax schedules and computations for all rollover and recurring adjustments from any previously examined and closed period that impact the CAP year, including the impact of any closing agreements or Appeals settlements. The taxpayer will provide these initial disclosures by the date of the opening conference. The parties will discuss the effect of such adjustments on the CAP year and any unexamined year and incorporate any changes as appropriate. The taxpayer will provide notice and documentation of any subsequent issue resolutions from a prior examination within 15 business days of the resolutions. The parties will discuss the effect of such resolutions on the CAP year and any unexamined year and incorporate any changes as appropriate. The taxpayer will immediately notify the AC of any investigation initiated on the taxpayer by a federal or state agency. The notification should include: A detailed explanation of the investigation An evaluation of whether access to corporate books and records could be limited Any material issues that could result from the investigation The taxpayer will notify the AC of any foreign initiated examinations or assessments that may impact income, expenses or credits reported in the United States, for the current or prior tax years, and will update this information on a quarterly basis as the information becomes available. All information provided to the IRS in connection with the CAP is return information protected from disclosure by the confidentiality provisions of IRC 6103. Ordinarily, a formal Information Document Request (IDR) should not be necessary in CAP and informal requests should be sufficient. However, if it is necessary to issue an IDR, the scope of the IDR should be discussed and the parties should reach a mutually agreed upon due date for the response. The requirements for issuing IDRs, outlined in IRM Exhibit 4.46.4-1, apply to both the pre-filing and post-filing phases of CAP. However, the IDR enforcement process outlined in IRM Exhibit 4.46.4-2, applies only to filed returns and a delinquency notice and subsequent summons may only be issued during the post-filing phase of CAP. The IRS will promptly evaluate the IDR response for completeness and, after a thorough analysis of the response, will discuss the results of the review with the taxpayer. The parties must strive for urgency during this real-time compliance review process in order to meet the CAP program goals. The IRS and taxpayers should interact on a regular basis. Calls and meetings should be held as needed to discuss and provide relevant information and documentation, and to discuss the status of the CAP and resolve concerns as they arise during the CAP. The parties should have in attendance representatives with sufficient authority to resolve any concerns being addressed. Since the CAP program relies on the transparent and cooperative interaction of the parties, the IRS and taxpayer should meet as needed to evaluate and document the transparency and cooperation of the parties. 4.51.8.3.5 (09-07-2023) Issue Resolution Process The IRS and taxpayer should regularly engage in discussions for resolving any factual or technical differences related to the identified material issues. After the parties have resolved an issue other than through simple factual clarification, the IRS must draft an Issue Resolution Agreement (IRA) for that issue. Upon the issuance of an IRA, the parties will mutually agree to a timely response date. In the response, the taxpayer will indicate its agreement or disagreement with the IRA. If the taxpayer disagrees with the IRA, the taxpayer will state, in writing, the relevant facts and legal arguments for its position. If for any reason the taxpayer is unable to comply with the due date of an IRA response, the taxpayer will notify the IRS immediately, explain the circumstances for the delay, and the parties will agree to a revised due date. Ordinarily an IRA is sufficient for documenting the resolution of most material issues. However, as deemed appropriate, the IRS may prepare a Form 906, Closing Agreement, based on the completed IRA. Issues resolved using closing agreements may be, but are not limited to, large or controversial issues. Issues that are resolved through requests for simple factual clarification or that merely require a taxpayer to expand or elaborate on information that was previously provided by the taxpayer do not generally require an IRA or a closing agreement. IRAs are required to be drafted for issues where the IRS resolved factual or technical differences, the IRS does not agree with the taxpayer’s position, or when a closing agreement is necessary. The issuance of an IRA when the IRS agrees with the taxpayer’s position is mandatory. Once both parties agree that an issue has been fully disclosed, the IRS will ordinarily have 90 days to resolve the issue. If additional time is required, the Case Territory Manager in collaboration with the Issue Territory Manager may approve the additional time. The IRS will promptly inform the taxpayer of any approved time extensions. If the issue is eligible for the Fast Track Settlement (FTS) process and still unresolved after 90 days or a different period if an extension is approved, the IRS will initiate the FTS process and the taxpayer must agree to participate in the process. If the issue is still unresolved after the FTS process, the taxpayer retains its traditional appeal rights. 4.51.8.3.6 (04-16-2020) Post-Filing Representation Within 30 days of the date the return is filed, the taxpayer will provide the IRS a Post-Filing Representation executed by an officer of the taxpayer with authority to sign the return. The Post-Filing Representation is a pro-forma document attached to the CAP MOU that includes: A statement that all material issues were disclosed and resolved as of the date that the return was filed or a full description of the material issues that were not disclosed or resolved as of that date; A statement that all resolved issues were reported as agreed as of the date that the return was filed or a full description of the resolved issues that were not reported as agreed as of that date; and A declaration that "Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this letter and accompanying documents, if any, and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this letter contains all relevant information, and that the representations in this letter are true, correct, and complete" 4.51.8.3.7 (04-16-2020) Post-Filing Full and Partial Acceptance Letters If, after the receipt and review of the Post-Filing Representation, the IRS determines that all material issues have been disclosed and resolved through simple factual clarification, issue resolution agreement or closing agreement, the IRS will provide the taxpayer with a Full Acceptance Letter. The Full Acceptance Letter constitutes written confirmation that, subject to the completion of the post-filing review of the return, the IRS will accept the taxpayer’s return if it is filed consistent with the resolutions of the resolved issues and no additional material issues or correlative adjustments are discovered during the post-filing review that were not previously disclosed. If, after the receipt and review of the Post-Filing Representation, the IRS determines that the taxpayer did not disclose all material issues or that the IRS and the taxpayer did not resolve all identified material issues, the IRS will provide the taxpayer with a Partial Acceptance Letter. The Partial Acceptance Letter constitutes written confirmation that, subject to the completion of the post-filing review of the return, the IRS will accept the taxpayer’s return, but for the undisclosed and unresolved material issues and correlative adjustments, if the return is filed consistent with the resolutions of the resolved issues and no additional material issues and correlative adjustments are discovered during the post-filing review that were not previously disclosed. 4.51.8.3.8 (04-16-2020) Post-Filing Review After a taxpayer files its return, the AC will secure a copy of the return and initiate the post-filing review. The goal for completing this review when a Full Acceptance Letter has been issued is within 60 days of the filing of the return. During the post-filing review, the IRS and the taxpayer will jointly review the filed return to verify that all material issues were disclosed and resolved and that all resolved issues were reported as agreed. If the review verifies that all material issues were disclosed and resolved and that all resolved issues were reported as agreed, the IRS will issue a no-change letter concluding the examination of the taxpayer's books of account for purposes of IRC 7605(b). If there are material issues that were not disclosed and resolved or there are resolved issues that were not reported as agreed, the IRS may examine any such issues through the post-filing examination process. 4.51.8.3.9 (09-07-2023) Miscellaneous The pre-filing review during the CAP does not constitute an examination or inspection of the taxpayer's books of account for purposes of IRC 7605(b). Non-income tax returns, such as, Forms 940, 941, 5500, 720 and 1042 are not included in the CAP and may be the subject of post-filing examinations. In addition, partnerships and other entities that are not 100% owned by members of the taxpayer's consolidated group are not included in the CAP and may also be the subject of post-filing examinations. The procedures of Rev. Proc. 2022-39 are not applicable to CAP taxpayers. 4.51.8.3.10 (09-07-2023) Credit for Increasing Research Activities and Amortization of Research and Experimental Expenditures The taxpayer will make open, comprehensive and contemporaneous disclosures of its research credit activities. The taxpayer will prepare and submit Form 14234-A, CAP Research Credit Questionnaire (CRCQ) in accordance with the form instructions and other guidance posted to the CAP page on IRS.gov. The AC will review the completed CRCQ and prepare the Account Coordinator Evaluation of the form. The Research Risk Review Team (RT) will review the completed CRCQ and assess the taxpayer’s research credit risk. The RT will communicate the results of its risk assessment to the AC during the planning phase of the pre-filing review. If consensus is not reached between the RT and CAP teams regarding the scope of the research credit review, the matter will be elevated to the next level of management. 4.51.8.3.11 (04-16-2020) Transfer Pricing Transactions The taxpayer will make open, comprehensive and contemporaneous disclosures of its material transfer pricing transactions. The taxpayer will disclose its material transfer pricing transactions by preparing the Material Intercompany Transactions Template (MITT) in accordance with the form instructions and other guidance posted to the CAP page on IRS.gov. The Transfer Pricing Risk Assessment (TPRA) Team will review the completed MITT and assess the taxpayer’s transfer pricing risk. The TPRA Team will communicate the results of its risk assessment to the AC during the planning phase of the pre-filing review. If consensus is not reached between the CAP and TPRA Team regarding the scope and depth of the transfer pricing transaction review, the matter will be elevated to the next level of management. 4.51.8.3.12 (04-16-2020) Advance Pricing Agreements A taxpayer that has already submitted a request for, or renewal of, an Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) under Rev. Proc. 2015-41 (or successor thereto) and/or a request for assistance from the U.S. Competent Authority under Rev. Proc. 2015-40 (or successor thereto) will notify the AC of the existence of such request and provide a copy of the request or renewal. The AC will then contact the appropriate Advance Pricing and Mutual Agreement (APMA) team or the Treaty Assistance and Interpretation Team (TAIT) lead or analyst to ensure ongoing coordination between the CAP and APMA/TAIT programs. The taxpayer is encouraged, and may be required, to seek an APA to cover a recurring controlled transaction. A taxpayer with ongoing transfer pricing issues may contact, or may be contacted by, the AC to request a meeting with APMA to discuss the benefits and/or requirement of entering into an APA. The taxpayer will provide notice and documentation of any subsequent resolutions of items or issues in prior examination cycles within 15 business days of the agreed determinations. The parties will discuss the effect of such resolutions on any unexamined tax years and on the CAP year and incorporate the changes as appropriate. The taxpayer will notify the AC of any foreign initiated examinations, pending adjustments or assessments that may impact income, expenses and/or credits reported in the United States, for the CAP year or any prior tax years, and will update such information on an as-needed basis to report any changes as the information becomes available. 4.51.8.4 (04-16-2020) Compliance Maintenance Phase A taxpayer with a limited number of material issues that continues to satisfy the CAP eligibility and suitability requirement, and has completed at least one complete CAP phase, may progress, if approved, to the Compliance Maintenance phase. In the Compliance Maintenance phase, the IRS, at its discretion, will reduce the level of review based on the complexity and volume of issues, and the taxpayer’s history of compliance, cooperation and transparency in the CAP. The taxpayer continues to make open, comprehensive and contemporaneous disclosures of its material issues. In evaluating a taxpayer’s eligibility for the Compliance Maintenance phase, the IRS will consider the following factors: The taxpayer continues to satisfy the eligibility and suitability criteria. The taxpayer has completed at least one full CAP phase. The taxpayer has effective internal controls. Historically, the taxpayer has a limited number of issues that are usually resolved before the tax return has been filed, and has been consistently compliant, cooperative and transparent in the prior phases. Note: The remaining processes and procedures for the Compliance Maintenance phase are fundamentally the same as for the CAP phase. Therefore, to avoid duplication, they have not been listed here. Refer to IRM 4.51.8.3 for more information. 4.51.8.5 (04-16-2020) Bridge Phase A taxpayer with few, if any, material issues that continues to satisfy the CAP eligibility and suitability requirements, and has completed at least one Compliance Maintenance phase (or at least one complete CAP phase when in the best interest of sound tax administration), may progress, if approved, to the Bridge phase. In the Bridge phase, the IRS will not accept any disclosures, conduct any reviews or provide any assurances regarding the bridged return. A taxpayer in the Bridge phase is still considered to be a participant in the CAP program and will be treated as a returning CAP taxpayer in the subsequent year CAP application process. However, if the taxpayer has a specific issue on the bridged return that it wants the IRS to consider, the taxpayer may submit a request for a pre-filing agreement (PFA) (see Rev. Proc. 2016-30 or its successor) provided that the issue meets the requirements for a PFA. In evaluating a taxpayer’s eligibility for the Bridge phase, the IRS will consider the following factors: The taxpayer continues to satisfy the eligibility and suitability criteria. The taxpayer has completed at least one full CAP phase. The taxpayer has effective internal controls. Historically, the taxpayer has few, if any, material issues that are usually resolved before the tax return has been filed, and has been consistently compliant, cooperative and transparent in the prior phases. Note: Selection for this phase is recognition that the compliance risk for the taxpayer’s return is low and that the expenditure of resources by the IRS and taxpayer to examine this return is not in the best interest of tax administration. 4.51.8.6 (04-16-2020) Terminations or Withdrawals If the taxpayer or the IRS is unable or has failed to comply with the terms of the CAP MOU, the parties will attempt to resolve these concerns on a contemporaneous basis. The parties will meet to discuss, and the concerns and resolution efforts will be documented using the Evaluation of Cooperation and Transparency Form. If the concerns are not resolved and the IRS determines that the taxpayer has failed to adhere to the terms of the MOU, the territory manager assigned to the case will issue the taxpayer a written notice that informs the taxpayer of the IRS’ concerns. If the concerns are not resolved within 30 days of receiving such notification, the DFO assigned to the case will issue the taxpayer a Termination Letter and its participation in the CAP program will cease. The IRS may then conduct a post-filing examination of the taxpayer’s open filed return. Examples of significant or consistent failures to adhere to the terms of the CAP program that may result in the issuance of a Termination Letter include: Not adhering to IDR response times or providing incomplete IDR responses Not engaging in meaningful or good faith issue resolution discussions Failing to thoroughly disclose a material issue in a timely manner Failing to disclose a tax shelter or listed transaction Failing to disclose an investigation or litigation that limits IRS access to current corporate records Frequently filing claims or requesting appeals Not adhering to the terms of the CAP MOU If at any time the taxpayer determines that it no longer wants to participate in the CAP program, the taxpayer may provide the IRS a written request to withdraw from the program. Upon receipt of such request, the IRS will issue the taxpayer a Termination Letter that terminates its participation in the CAP program. The IRS may then conduct a post-filing examination of the taxpayer’s open filed return. 4.51.8.7 (04-16-2020) Claims All potential claims for credit or refund must be brought to the attention of the AC as soon as the taxpayer becomes aware that it has potential claims. All claims or requests for tentative refunds affecting federal income tax liability must be filed using Form 1120X or Form 1139. The claims must meet the standards of Treas. Reg. 301.6402-2, which states that if a taxpayer is required to file a claim for refund or credit on a particular form, then the claim, together with appropriate supporting evidence, will be filed in a manner consistent with such form, form instructions, publications and other guidance found on IRS.gov. 4.51.8.8 (09-07-2023) Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) Review If it is determined that the filed return will result in a refund claim subject to review by the JCT, any associated closing agreements cannot be executed on behalf of the government until they have been reviewed and approved by the JCT. The closing agreements signed by the taxpayer will be submitted with the Joint Committee report and if the JCT takes no exception to the report and agreements, the DFO assigned to the case may sign the agreements. Please refer to IRM 4.36.3, Joint Committee Procedures, Examination Team Responsibilities. If the IRS CAP team issues a Full Acceptance Letter and the post-filing review confirms that all material issues were disclosed and resolved, and all resolved issues were reported as agreed, the IRS CAP team will submit a referral to the Joint Committee Review (JCR) program and forward the Full Acceptance Letter to the JCR program. When the JCT has completed its review and sends the Release Letter to the IRS, the IRS will execute any applicable closing agreements. If the IRS CAP team issues a Partial Acceptance Letter, once all the remaining issues have been fully resolved, the IRS CAP team should submit a referral to the JCR program. When the JCT has completed its review and sends the Release Letter to the IRS, the IRS will execute any applicable closing agreements. 4.51.8.9 (09-07-2023) Transition Rule As part of the CAP recalibration, significant changes were made to the CAP program starting in the 2019 CAP year. The review for any CAP year should be conducted under the provisions of the MOU that was executed for that CAP year. More Internal Revenue Manual