This document contains the annual report to the public concerning Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) and the experience of the APA Program during calendar year 2007. This document does not provide guidance regarding the application of the arm’s length standard. Instead, it reports on the structure and activities of the APA Program.

Low-income housing credit; satisfactory bond; “bond factor” amounts for the period January through June 2008. This ruling provides the monthly bond factor amounts to be used by taxpayers who dispose of qualified low-income buildings or interests therein during the period January through June 2008.

Final, temporary, and proposed regulations amend regulations section 1.1502-13(c)(6)(ii)(C), which relates to the redetermination of intercompany gain as excluded from gross income.

Final, temporary, and proposed regulations amend regulations section 1.1502-13(c)(6)(ii)(C), which relates to the redetermination of intercompany gain as excluded from gross income.

Final regulations under section 817(h) of the Code make changes to the regulations concerning diversification requirements. The changes expand the list of holders whose beneficial interests in an investment company, partnership, or trust do not prevent a segregated asset account from looking through to the assets of the investment company, partnership, or trust, to satisfy the requirements of section 817(h). The regulations also remove the sentence in regulations section 1.817-5(a)(2) that provides that the payment required to remedy an inadvertent diversification failure must be based on the tax that would have been owed by the policyholders if they were treated as receiving the income on the contract.

This notice clarifies, amends, supplements, and supersedes Notice 2008-27, 2008-10 I.R.B. 543, which modified certain special reissuance standards for “qualified tender bonds” under IRS Notice 88-130, 1988-2 C.B. 543, and modified certain aspects of the application of regulations section 1.1001-3 as they apply to tax-exempt bonds. This notice retains the basic rule framework outlined in Notice 2008-27 except that it makes certain technical changes and extends, temporarily, the period of time, from 90 days to 180 days, during which an issuer may hold qualified tender bonds prior to their remarketing without causing such bonds to be treated as retired. This notice also introduces a temporary rule which allows a governmental issuer to purchase and hold its own tax-exempt auction rate bonds for 180 days without causing a retirement or extinguishment of the debt represented by the purchased tax-exempt bonds. Notice 2008-27 clarified, amended, supplemented, and superseded.

This notice provides that a modification of a life insurance split-dollar arrangement that does not include any change to the life insurance contract underlying the arrangement will not be treated as a material change in the life insurance contract underlying the arrangement.

This notice provides interim rules for contingent fees under section 10.27(b)(2) of Circular 230. Specifically, this notice provides (1) A clarification that the “within 120 days of the taxpayer receiving a written notice of the examination of, or a written challenge to the original tax return” language in section 10.27(b)(2)(ii) does not require the IRS to furnish the written notice of examination to a taxpayer as a prerequisite to a practitioner charging a contingent fee and (2) A new exception under section 10.27 that allows practitioners to charge a contingent fee with respect to whistleblower claims under section 7623(b) of the Code. The IRS will apply the interim rules under section 10.27(b)(2) in the notice until the Treasury Department and the IRS amend the regulations.

This document contains corrections to final and temporary regulations (T.D. 9368, 2008-6 I.R.B. 382) regarding the reduction of the number of separate foreign tax credit limitation categories under section 904(d) of the Code. The regulations affect taxpayers claiming foreign tax credits and provide guidance needed to comply with the statutory changes made by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA).

This document cancels a public hearing on proposed regulations (REG-141399-07, 2008-8 I.R.B. 470) providing guidance relating to the recapture of overall foreign and domestic losses.

In Rev. Rul. 90-60, 1990-2 C.B. 3, the Internal Revenue Service provided guidance to taxpayers concerning the general methodology used by the Treasury Department in computing the bond factor amounts used in calculating the amount of bond considered satisfactory by the Secretary under § 42(j)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code. It further announced that the Secretary would publish in the Internal Revenue Bulletin a table of bond factor amounts for dispositions occurring during each calendar month.

Rev. Proc. 99-11, 1999-1 C.B. 275, established a collateral program as an alternative to providing a surety bond for taxpayers to avoid or defer recapture of the low-income housing tax credits under § 42(j)(6). Under this program, taxpayers may establish a Treasury Direct Account and pledge certain United States Treasury securities to the Internal Revenue Service as security.

This revenue ruling provides in Table 1 the bond factor amounts for calculating the amount of bond considered satisfactory under § 42(j)(6) or the amount of United States Treasury securities to pledge in a Treasury Direct Account under Rev. Proc. 99-11 for dispositions of qualified low-income buildings or interests therein during the period January through June 2008.

For a list of bond factor amounts applicable to dispositions occurring during other calendar years, see: Rev. Rul. 98-3, 1998-1 C.B. 248; Rev. Rul. 2001-2, 2001-1 C.B. 255; Rev. Rul. 2001-53, 2001-2 C.B. 488; Rev. Rul. 2002-72, 2002-2 C.B. 759; Rev. Rul. 2003-117, 2003-2 C.B. 1051; Rev. Rul. 2004-100, 2004-2 C.B. 718; Rev. Rul. 2005-67, 2005-2 C.B. 771; Rev. Rul. 2006-51, 2006-2 C.B. 632; and Rev. Rul. 2007-62, 2007-41 I.R.B. 767.

The principal author of this revenue ruling is David McDonnell of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries). For further information regarding this revenue ruling, contact Mr. McDonnell at (202) 622-3040 (not a toll-free call).

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

Final regulations.

This document contains final regulations concerning the diversification requirements of section 817(h) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). The regulations expand the list of holders whose beneficial interests in an investment company, partnership, or trust do not prevent a segregated asset account from looking through to the assets of the investment company, partnership, or trust, to satisfy the requirements of section 817(h). The regulations also remove the sentence in §1.817-5(a)(2) that provides that the payment required to remedy an inadvertent diversification failure must be based on the tax that would have been owed by the policyholders if they were treated as receiving the income on the contract. The regulations affect insurance companies that issue variable contracts and affect policyholders who purchase such contracts.

Effective/applicability date: These regulations are effective as of March 7, 2008.

James Polfer, (202) 622-3970 (not a toll-free number).

Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows:

The principal author of these final regulations is James Polfer, Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products), Internal Revenue Service. However, personnel from other offices of the Treasury Department and the IRS participated in their development.

* * * * *

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

Final and temporary regulations.

This document contains final and temporary regulations concerning the treatment of certain intercompany gain with respect to consolidated group member stock. These regulations revise §1.1502-13(c)(6)(ii)(C) to provide for the redetermination of an intercompany gain as excluded from gross income in certain member stock transactions. These regulations affect corporations filing consolidated returns. The text of these temporary regulations also serves as the text of the proposed regulations (REG-137573-07) set forth in the notice of proposed rulemaking on this subject in this issue of the Bulletin.

Effective Date: These regulations are effective on March 7, 2008.

Applicability Date: For dates of applicability, see §1.1502-13T(c)(6)(ii)(C)(2) and (f)(7)(ii).

John F. Tarrant or Ross E. Poulsen, (202) 622-7790 (not a toll-free number).

Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows:

The principal author of these regulations is John F. Tarrant, Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate). However, other personnel from the IRS and Treasury Department participated in their development.

* * * * *

This notice clarifies, amends, supplements, and supersedes Notice 2008-27, 2008-10 I.R.B. 543 (March 10, 2008), regarding reissuance standards for tax-exempt bonds. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and the Treasury Department expect to issue regulations under § 150 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”) to modify and clarify the determination of when tax-exempt bonds are treated as reissued or retired solely for purposes of § 103 and §§ 141 through 150. (Except as noted, section references in this notice are to the Code and the Income Tax Regulations). This notice provides interim guidance until the promulgation of such regulations. In part, this notice is intended to provide greater certainty and flexibility to address certain potential Federal tax issues that have arisen in the tax-exempt bond market as a result of recent rating agency downgrades of major municipal bond insurers and failures of auctions in the auction rate bond sector of the tax-exempt bond market.

In general, this notice clarifies, amends, supplements, and supersedes Notice 2008-27, which modified certain special reissuance standards for “qualified tender bonds” under IRS Notice 88-130, 1988-2 C.B. 543, for purposes of § 103 and §§ 141 through 150, and modified certain aspects of the application of § 1.1001-3 of the Income Tax Regulations as they apply to tax-exempt bonds.

The following discussion summarizes the changes and clarifications to Notice 2008-27 made in this notice:

Qualified Tender Bond Rules. With respect to the qualified tender bond provisions, this notice does the following: (1) it clarifies that the determination of whether a bond is a “qualified tender bond” is generally applied on a bond-by-bond basis, except to the extent that such test requires a determination of the weighted average maturity of the entire issue; (2) it adds qualified inflation rates and qualified inverse floating rates under § 1.1275-5(c) as eligible interest rates for qualified tender bonds; and (3) it clarifies how the 90-day remarketing requirement in the definition of a qualified tender right operates but also provides a temporary 180-day remarketing requirement.

New Temporary Rule Allowing Governmental Issuers to Purchase Their Own Auction Rate Bonds. In order to facilitate liquidity in the tax-exempt market in light of current market conditions, this notice introduces a temporary rule which allows a governmental issuer to purchase its own tax-exempt auction rate bonds on a temporary basis without causing a retirement or extinguishment of the debt represented by the purchased tax-exempt bonds.

Certain Arbitrage Rules. This notice also adds several rules which address the consequences of certain actions for purposes of the arbitrage investment restrictions under § 148, including actions taken pursuant to this notice relating to qualified hedges, purchases of tax-exempt bonds by conduit borrowers, and sales of bonds at a market premium pursuant to a qualified interest rate mode change under this notice. This notice supplements the arbitrage rule on the treatment of minor modifications of qualified hedges from Notice 2008-27 with a rule which provides that a deemed termination of an otherwise qualified hedge under § 1.148-4(h) will not result from bonds being held by or on behalf of a governmental issuer during the 90-day permitted holding period or the temporary 180-day permitted holding period for remarketing pursuant to a qualified tender right or during the 180-day permitted holding period for temporary purchases of auction rate bonds. With respect to a conduit borrower’s purchase of tax-exempt bonds, the notice adds a special rule which provides that such a purchase will not cause a violation of a technical arbitrage restriction against purchases of tax-exempt bonds by conduit borrowers under the “program investment” definition in § 1.148-1(b) in certain circumstances. Further, with respect to certain permitted resales of bonds at a market premium upon a conversion of the interest rate to a fixed interest rate to maturity, this notice provides that, solely for arbitrage purposes, any premium properly received by an issuer pursuant to a qualified interest rate mode change is treated as additional sale proceeds (as defined in § 1.148-1(b)).

Certain Special Rules. Finally, with respect to two special rules from Notice 2008-27 which address certain temporary waivers of interest rate caps and certain nonrecourse debt, this notice continues those rules and extends the period during which interest rate caps may be waived without resulting in a significant modification under § 1.1001-3 until October 1, 2008.

Changes to Examples

This notice removes certain language from Example 2 of Notice 2008-27, because that language has proven confusing. No other inference should be drawn with respect to the transaction. In addition, this notice contains an additional example illustrating the temporary 180-day qualified tender bond remarketing requirement.

Scope and Effective Date. This notice applies solely for purposes of § 103 and §§ 141 through 150. No inference should be drawn regarding whether a debt modification described in this notice would constitute an exchange for purposes of § 1001. In addition, no inference should be drawn about whether similar consequences would obtain if a transaction falls outside the scope of this notice.

This notice is effective as of March 25, 2008. For the scope of application of this notice, see section 8 of this notice.

This notice invites public comment on the guidance provided herein.

3.1. Scope and General Rules. The IRS and the Treasury Department expect to promulgate regulations under § 150 to provide guidance on whether tax-exempt bonds are treated as reissued or retired solely for purposes of § 103 and §§ 141 through 150. Specifically, for purposes of § 103 and §§ 141 through 150 only, in the case of a qualified tender bond (as defined herein), any qualified interest rate mode change (as defined herein) and any qualified tender right (as defined herein) will not be treated as a modification under § 1.1001-3. Therefore, for these purposes, a qualified tender bond will not be treated as reissued or retired solely as a result of a qualified interest rate mode change or the existence or exercise of any qualified tender right. Further, in applying § 1.1001-3 to modifications of tax-exempt bonds, any interest rate variance directly resulting from a qualified interest rate mode change will not be treated as a modification under § 1.1001-3, and thus such interest rate variances need not be tested under the change in yield rule for determining significant modifications under § 1.1001-3(e)(2). Except as otherwise specifically provided in this notice, the determination of whether any modification to an issue of tax-exempt bonds causes a reissuance or retirement of the tax-exempt bonds for purposes of § 103 and §§ 141 through 150 is based on whether the modifications are significant modifications under § 1.1001-3.

Except as expressly provided herein in the special rules for the treatment of “qualified interest rate mode changes” and “qualified tender rights” on “qualified tender bonds” (all as redefined herein) under § 3 of this notice, the special temporary rule allowing governmental issuers to purchase their own tax-exempt auction rate bonds for a limited holding period under § 4 of this notice, the special arbitrage rules under § 5 of this notice, and the other special rules under § 6 of this notice, a tax-exempt bond generally is treated as reissued or retired on the first date on which: (1) a significant modification to the terms of the bond occurs under § 1.1001-3 or a disposition of the bond otherwise occurs under section 1001; (2) the bond is purchased or otherwise acquired by or on behalf of a governmental issuer (as defined herein); or (3) the bond is otherwise retired or redeemed.

For purposes of determining whether a bond is purchased or otherwise acquired by or on behalf of a governmental issuer, except as otherwise expressly provided in § 3.2(3) and § 4 of this notice, a bond is treated as purchased or otherwise acquired by or on behalf of a person if the bond is purchased or otherwise acquired by that person in a manner that liquidates the bondholder’s investment.

A purchase of a tax-exempt bond by a third-party guarantor or third-party liquidity facility provider pursuant to the terms of a third-party guarantee or third-party liquidity facility is not treated as a purchase or other acquisition by or on behalf of a governmental issuer. Similarly, a purchase of a tax-exempt bond by a conduit borrower that is not a governmental issuer is not treated as a purchase or other acquisition by or on behalf of the governmental issuer.

3.2. Definitions and Operating Rules. The following definitions and special operating rules apply for purposes of this notice only:

(1). Qualified Tender Bond. The term “qualified tender bond” means a tax-exempt bond that has all of the following features: (a) for each interest rate mode that is preauthorized under the terms of the bond considered separately, the bond bears interest during the allowable term of that interest rate mode at either a fixed interest rate, a variable interest rate that constitutes a qualified floating rate on a variable rate debt instrument for a tax-exempt bond under § 1.1275-5(b) (e.g., various interest rate indexes and rate-setting mechanisms that reasonably can be expected to measure contemporaneous variations in the cost of newly-borrowed funds, including, without limitation, interest rates determined by reference to eligible interest rate indexes (e.g., the SIFMA index), tender option-based interest rate measures, or a Dutch auction process), or a variable interest rate that constitutes an eligible objective rate for a variable rate debt instrument that is a tax-exempt bond under § 1.1275-5(c)(5) (i.e., a qualified inflation rate or a qualified inverse floating rate); (b) interest on the bond is unconditionally payable at periodic intervals at least annually; (c) the final maturity date of the bond is no longer than the lesser of 40 years after the issue date of the bond or the latest date that is reasonably expected as of the issue date of the issue of which the bond is a part to be necessary to carry out the governmental purpose of the issue of which the bond is a part (with the 120 percent weighted average economic life of financed facilities test under Section 147(b) with respect to the issue of which the bond is a part being treated as a safe harbor for this purpose); and (d) the bond is subject to an optional tender right or a mandatory tender requirement which allows or requires a bondholder to tender the bond for purchase in one or more prescribed circumstances under the terms of the bond.

(2). Qualified Interest Rate Mode Change. In general, a “qualified interest rate mode change” is a change in the interest rate mode on a bond that is authorized under the terms of the bond upon its original issuance. Further, in order to be a qualified interest rate mode change, the terms of the bond must require that the bond be purchased and resold at a price equal to par upon conversion to a new interest rate mode, except only that, upon a conversion to an interest rate mode that is a fixed interest rate for the remaining term of the bond to maturity, the bond may be resold at a market premium or a market discount from the stated principal amount of that bond.

(3). Qualified Tender Right.

(a) In General. A “qualified tender right” is a tender right for the purchase of a bond (regardless of whether the purchase is by or on behalf of a governmental issuer) that is authorized under the terms of a bond upon its original issuance and that meets all of the requirements of this § 3.2(3)(a). The tender right must involve either an optional tender right or a mandatory tender requirement which allows or requires the bondholder to tender the bond for purchase on at least one tender date before the final stated maturity date. The tender right must entitle a tendering bondholder to receive a purchase price equal to par (which may include any accrued interest). The terms of the tender right must require the issuer or its remarketing agent to use at least best efforts to remarket a bond upon a purchase pursuant to the tender right.

(b) Operating Rules for Purchases Pursuant to a Qualified Tender Right. A bond purchased by or on behalf of a governmental issuer pursuant to a qualified tender right is treated as not retired pursuant to and as a result of the qualified tender right until not later than the end of the 90-day period from and after the date of such purchase, and subsequent to the end of this 90-day period, a governmental issuer generally may not hold its own bond without causing a retirement of such bond under the general rules in § 3.1 of this notice. This 90-day period is extended to 180-days, however, with respect to any purchase by or on behalf of a governmental issuer pursuant to a qualified tender right as long as such purchase occurs before October 1, 2008.

Thus, with respect to such bonds purchased before October 1, 2008, during this 180-day period, a governmental issuer or its agent may hold the bond under the terms of the bond without causing a retirement of the bond. In addition, recognizing that the bond is treated as outstanding during this 180-day period, the governmental issuer may refund the bond with a refunding bond during this period upon a failed remarketing.

By contrast, third-party guarantors, third-party liquidity facility providers, and conduit borrowers (other than a conduit borrower that is a governmental issuer) are not treated as purchasers by or on behalf of a governmental issuer under the general rules in § 3.1 of this notice, and, accordingly, any such person may hold a bond purchased pursuant to the exercise of a qualified tender right for an unlimited holding period without causing a retirement of such bond. Further, for example, a governmental issuer may hold a bond purchased before October 1, 2008, pursuant to the exercise of a qualified tender right for a holding period of 179 days while using best efforts under the terms of the bonds to remarket the bond and then resell the bond to a third-party guarantor, third-party liquidity facility provider, or other independent third party before the expiration of the 180-day period in compliance with the operating rules in this § 3.2(3)(b).

(4). Governmental issuer. A “governmental issuer” is an issuer of a tax-exempt bond that is a governmental unit or an agency or instrumentality thereof.

Solely for purposes of § 103 and §§ 141 through 150, a governmental issuer may purchase its own tax-exempt auction rate bond on a temporary basis without resulting in a reissuance or retirement of the purchased tax-exempt bond if it meets the following requirements: (1) the governmental issuer holds the bond for not more than a 180-day period from and after the date of purchase; and (2) the governmental issuer purchases the bond before October 1, 2008. Similar to the treatment of a bond purchased pursuant to a qualified tender right under the operating rule in § 3.2(3)(b) of this notice, an auction rate bond purchased by a governmental issuer pursuant to this § 4 is treated as not retired pursuant to and as a result of this special rule until not later than the end of this 180-day period, and, subsequent to the end of this 180-day period, a governmental issuer generally may not hold its own bond without causing a retirement of such bond under the general rules in § 3.1 of this notice.

Thus, recognizing that the bond is treated as not retired during this 180-day period, the governmental issuer may refund the bond with a refunding bond, tender the bond for purchase in a qualified tender right in its capacity as a bondholder, or otherwise resell the bond during this 180-day period. After the end of this 180-day period, however, a governmental issuer generally may not hold its own bond without causing a retirement of such bond under the general rules in § 3.1 of this notice.

5.1. Certain Special Rules on Qualified Hedges for Arbitrage Purposes. Solely for purposes of the arbitrage investment restrictions (including, without limitation, both yield restriction and rebate) under § 148, in determining whether a modification of a qualified hedge results in a termination of the hedge under § 1.148-4(h), such a modification is not treated as a termination of the hedge if both: (1) the modification is not reasonably expected as of the date of the modification to change the yield on the affected hedged bonds over the remaining term of the hedged bonds by more than one quarter of one percent (.25 percent or twenty-five basis points) per annum; and (2) the payments and receipts on the qualified hedge, as modified, are fully taken into account as adjustments to the yield on those hedged bonds for arbitrage purposes under § 148. Further, for arbitrage purposes under § 148, a qualified hedge with respect to bonds is not deemed terminated under § 1.148-4(h) as a result of the governmental issuer’s holding of the hedged bonds during either the 90-day permitted holding period or the 180-day temporary permitted holding period under § 3.2(3), or the 180-day permitted holding period under § 4 of this notice during which the governmental issuer is permitted to hold such bonds without resulting in a reissuance or retirement of such bonds.

5.2. Special Rule for Certain Purchases by Conduit Borrowers. In applying the special arbitrage rule for “program investments” under § 1.148-1(b) which restricts a conduit borrower’s purchase of tax-exempt bonds for a governmental program in an amount “related” to the amount of its purpose investment financed by the program, a conduit borrower’s purchase of a tax-exempt auction rate bond that financed its loan to facilitate liquidity under adverse market conditions is treated as not being so “related” for this purpose.

5.3. Treatment of Certain Premiums as Proceeds for Arbitrage Purposes. Solely for purposes of the arbitrage investment restrictions under § 148, any premium received by an issuer pursuant to a conversion of the interest rate on a qualified tender bond to a fixed interest rate for the remaining term of the bond to maturity in a qualified interest rate mode change under § 3.2(2) of this notice is treated as additional sale proceeds (as defined in § 1.148-1(b)) of such bonds.

6.1. Special Rule for Nonrecourse Debt. Solely for purposes of § 103 and §§ 141 through 150, in applying § 1.1001-3(e)(4)(iv)(B) to determine whether a modification of the security or credit enhancement on a tax-exempt bond that is a nonrecourse debt instrument is a significant modification, such a modification is treated as a significant modification only if the modification results in a change in payment expectations under § 1.1001-3(e)(4)(vi).

6.2. Special Temporary Relief for Certain Waivers of Interest Rate Caps on Auction Rate Bonds. Solely for purposes of § 103 and §§ 141 through 150, in applying § 1.1001-3(e)(2) to determine whether a modification to the yield on tax-exempt bonds that bear interest based on an auction rate constitutes a significant modification, a temporary waiver, in whole or in part, of the terms of a cap on the maximum interest rate on such auction rate bonds is disregarded to the extent that any agreement to waive such a cap and the period during which such a waiver is in effect both are within the period between November 1, 2007 and October 1, 2008. Except for the special relief provided in this section, a waiver of a cap on an interest rate on a tax-exempt bond generally is required to be tested for whether it causes a significant modification under § 1.1001-3.

The following examples illustrate the application of certain principles in this notice and § 1.1001-3 as they apply to tax-exempt bonds for purposes of this notice.

Example 1. Insignificant Change in Credit Enhancement and Impact on Floating Interest Rate. On July 1, 2007, a municipality (the “Issuer”) issued $1 million in tax-exempt bonds that bear interest at an auction interest rate and that mature in 40 years (the “Bonds”). The Bonds are recourse obligations that are secured by the issuer’s underlying primary A-rated investment grade credit. The Bonds are secured further by credit enhancement under a bond insurance policy provided by a AAA-rated bond insurer. Pursuant to the terms of the Bonds, the auction interest rate on the Bonds resets every 7 days. The terms of the Bonds grant the issuer the option to convert the interest rate mode on the Bonds from an auction rate mode to either a 7-day tender option rate mode or to a long-term fixed interest rate to maturity, subject to a mandatory tender of the Bonds upon such a conversion. The Bonds are qualified tender bonds under § 3.2 of this notice.

On January 3, 2008, the auction interest rate on the Bonds is set at 10% as a consequence of a downgrade in the bond insurer’s credit rating from a AAA rating to a AA rating and associated market disruption. On January 10, 2008, the issuer amended the terms of the Bonds to replace the now AA-rated bond insurance with a AAA-rated bank letter of credit as credit enhancement, but otherwise made no other changes to the terms of the Bonds. On January 10, 2008, the auction rate on the Bonds floated down to 3% primarily as a result of the change in credit enhancement on the Bonds.

The amendment to the terms of the Bonds to change the credit enhancement is a modification to a recourse debt instrument that must be tested for significance under the change in security or credit enhancement rule in § 1.1001-3(e)(4)(iv). Because the change in security or credit enhancement did not cause a change in payment expectations on the Bonds (i.e., the Bonds had an investment grade payment expectation before and after the change in credit enhancement), this change in credit enhancement is not a significant modification of the Bonds under § 1.1001-3 and thus does not cause a reissuance of the Bonds under § 103 and §§ 141 through 150. Further, the fact that the market impact of the change in credit enhancement caused the floating interest rate on the Bonds to float down from 10% to 3% is not required to be tested under the 25-basis point change in yield rule for significant modifications under § 1.1001-3(e)(2) because the Issuer has made no change to the interest rate-setting mechanism under the terms of the Bonds.

Example 2. Exchange of Bonds to Remove Bond Insurance.

Assume the same facts as in Example 1 above, except that, instead of amending the terms of the existing Bonds (the “Old Bonds”) to change the credit enhancement, on January 10, 2008, the Issuer issued new bonds with new Cusip numbers (the “New Bonds”) and did an actual exchange of the New Bonds for the Old Bonds. The New Bonds are not backed by any bond insurance or other credit enhancement. The New Bonds without the bond insurance have an A credit rating. There are no other differences between the New Bonds and the Old Bonds. The result would be the same as in Example 1 and no reissuance of the Bonds would occur. Section 1.1001-3 applies the same significant modification standard to amendments to the terms of an existing debt instrument and to actual exchanges of an existing debt instruments for a different debt instrument.

Example 3. Impact of Authorized Changes in Interest Rate Modes and Associated Mandatory Tenders and Effect of Serialization.

(i) Assume the same facts as in Example 1 above, except that, on January 10, 2008, the Issuer also exercised its option under the terms of the Bonds to convert the interest rate mode on the Bonds from an auction rate mode to a fixed interest rate of 5% for the remaining term of the Bonds. The terms of the Bonds also required a mandatory tender and remarketing of the Bonds in connection with this interest rate mode change. The mandatory tender is a qualified tender right and the change in the interest rate mode is a qualified interest rate mode change. Thus, the Bonds are qualified tender bonds, as defined in § 3.2 of the notice, the conversion of the interest rate on the Bonds from an auction rate mode to a fixed interest rate is pursuant to a qualified interest rate mode change” and the associated tender is a qualified tender right, all as defined in § 3.2 of the notice. Thus, under § 3.1 of the notice, in determining whether the Bonds are reissued for purposes of the tax-exempt bond provisions of the Code, the qualified interest rate mode change and the qualified tender right are not treated as modifications under § 1.1001-3. Furthermore, the interest rate change on the Bonds from a floating auction rate of 10% to a fixed interest rate of 5% directly resulted from the qualified interest rate mode change and, under § 3.1 of the notice, also is not treated as a modification under § 1.1001-3. Finally, as in Example 1, no reissuance of the Bonds occurred for purposes of § 103 and §§ 141 through 150 as a result of the change in credit enhancement.

(ii) Assume the same facts as paragraph (i) above except that the Issuer also amended the terms of the Bonds to modify a term Bond which had a prescribed mandatory sinking fund redemption schedule with alternative Bonds with “serial” maturities instead of the sinking fund redemption schedule. This “serialization” of the term Bond does not directly result from the qualified interest rate mode change. Subject to the particular terms of the Bonds, the serialization of the term Bond generally would be a modification under § 1.1001-3 which would be required to be analyzed for significance under the change in yield rule in § 1.1001-3(e)(2) and the change in the timing of payments rule in § 1.1001-3(e)(3).

Example 4. Impact of Unauthorized Changes. Assume the same facts as in Example 1, except that the terms of the Bonds do not provide for any conversions of the interest rate modes. On January 7, 2008, Issuer amends the Bond documents to allow the Issuer to convert the interest rate mode on the Bonds from an auction rate mode to either a 7-day tender option rate mode or to a long-term fixed interest rate to maturity, subject to a mandatory tender of the Bonds upon such a conversion. On January 10, 2008, Issuer exercised its option under the amended terms of the Bonds to convert the interest rate mode on the Bonds from an auction rate mode to a fixed interest rate of 5% for the remaining term of the Bonds. The Issuer also required a mandatory tender and remarketing of the Bonds in connection with this interest rate mode change. Because the change in interest rate mode is not pursuant to the terms of the Bonds when originally issued, it is not a qualified interest rate mode change within the meaning of this notice. Similarly, the tender of the Bonds on January 10, 2008 was not pursuant to the terms of the Bond as originally issued and therefore was not a qualified tender right within the meaning of this notice. Accordingly, the provisions of this notice are not applicable either to the interest rate mode change on the Bonds or to the tender of the Bonds. Thus, to determine whether these modifications cause a reissuance or retirement of the Bonds for purposes of § 103 and §§ 141 through 150, the impact of these modifications must be analyzed under § 1.1001-3 to determine whether a significant modification of the terms of the Bonds occurred.

Example 5. Operation of the 180-Day Temporary Rule for Qualified Tender Rights.

(i) On July 1, 2007, a municipality (the “Issuer”) issued $1 million in tax-exempt bonds that bear interest initially at a variable rate demand rate and that mature in 40 years (the “Bonds”). The interest rate on the Bonds resets every 7 days at the minimum interest rate necessary to remarket the Bonds at par. The Bonds have seven-day tender options exercisable by the holders while the Bonds are in the variable rate demand interest rate mode. The Bonds give the Issuer an option to convert the interest rate on the Bonds to other interest rate modes. The Bonds have a mandatory tender requirement upon an interest rate mode conversion. The Bonds are secured by a third-party liquidity facility in the form of a letter of credit (the “Liquidity Facility”) from a bank (the “Bank”). The Bonds are further secured by a third-party guarantee in the form of a bond insurance policy from a bond insurer (the “Bond Insurer”). An investment bank serves as a remarketing agent (“Remarketing Agent”) for the Issuer with respect to the Bonds. The terms of the remarketing arrangement require the Remarketing Agent to use at least its best efforts to remarket tendered Bonds. On May 1, 2008, the Issuer exercises its option to convert the interest rate on the Bonds to a fixed interest rate to maturity and the Bonds are subject to mandatory tender by the Bondholders. The Bonds are qualified tender bonds which have a qualified tender right and a qualified interest rate mode change within the meaning of § 3.2 of this notice. During the 180-day period after the date of purchase of the bonds pursuant to the qualified tender right, as a result of difficult market conditions and despite best efforts required pursuant to the terms of the Bonds, the Issuer and the Remarketing Agent are unsuccessful in remarketing the Bonds. The particular terms of the Liquidity Facility require that the qualified tender right be funded by the Bank under the Liquidity Facility, but that the Bank not hold the Bonds upon a draw on the Liquidity Facility. Instead, the Bank merely receives a pledge of the Bonds as collateral for the draw on the Liquidity Facility and the Issuer holds the Bonds upon a draw on the Liquidity Facility. During this 180-day period, the Bonds are treated as outstanding under the operating rules for qualified tender rights in § 3.2(3)(b) even if the Bonds are held by or on behalf of the Issuer. Thus, during this 180-day period, the Issuer may hold the Bonds under the terms of the Bonds without causing a retirement of the Bonds. In addition, recognizing that the Bonds are treated as outstanding during this 180-day period, the Issuer may refund the Bonds with proceeds from refunding bonds during this period or resell the bonds to a third party.

(ii) Assume the same facts as in paragraph (i), but further assume that the Issuer retains the Bonds beyond the 180-day permitted holding period for a governmental issuer under § 3.2(3)(b) of this notice. The Bonds are treated as retired as of the end of the 180^th day from and after the date of the purchase of the Bonds pursuant to the exercise of the qualified tender right. Thus, the count of the 180-day permitted holding period for the Issuer starts on the date of the purchase pursuant to the qualified tender right (here, starting May 1, 2008) and ends at the end of the 180^th day from and after the date of purchase (here, ending at the end of the day on October 27, 2008).

(iii) Assume the same facts as in paragraph (i), but further assume that the terms of the Liquidity Facility provide that the Bank will hold the Bonds upon a draw on the Liquidity Facility, rather than merely receive a pledge of the Bonds as collateral while the Issuer or its agent holds the Bonds. Here, since a third-party liquidity facility provider is not treated as a purchaser by or on behalf of a governmental issuer under the general rules in § 3.1 of this notice, the Bank may hold the Bonds during and beyond the 180-day period after the date of the purchase pursuant to the qualified tender right without causing a retirement of the Bonds.

(iv) Assume the same facts as in paragraph (i), but further assume that the Issuer holds the Bonds for 179 days after purchase of the Bonds pursuant to the exercise of a qualified tender right while using best efforts under the terms of the Bonds to remarket the Bonds, and then sells the Bonds to the Bank pursuant to the Liquidity Facility. This transaction complies with the operating rules for qualified tender rights in § 3.2(3)(b) of this notice and does not result in a retirement of the Bonds.

The effective date of this notice is March 25, 2008. This notice provides interim guidance. Issuers of tax-exempt bonds may apply and rely on this notice for any actions taken with respect to tax-exempt bonds on or after November 1, 2007 and before the effective date of any future regulation under § 150 that implement the guidance with respect to any particular applicable provision in this notice or other public guidance that withdraws or supersedes any particular applicable provision in this notice. Issuers also may continue to rely on Notice 88-130 until the effective date of such future regulations. Notice 2008-27 is superseded and may not be relied upon after the effective date of this notice. The IRS and the Treasury Department may amend or supplement the guidance in this notice as circumstances warrant.

Before any notice of proposed rulemaking is issued with respect to the guidance provided in this notice, consideration will be given to any written public comments on this notice that are submitted timely by May 19, 2008, and a signed original and eight (8) copies of such comments should be sent to the IRS. Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (NOT-2008-41), room 5203, IRS, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be sent electronically, via the IRS Internet site at www.irs.gov/regs or via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and REG-118788-06). All comments will be available for public inspection and copying.

The principal author of this notice is Aviva M. Roth, Office of the Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products). However, other personnel from the IRS and the Treasury Department participated in its development. For further information regarding this notice, contact Aviva M. Roth at (202) 622-3980 (not a toll-free call).

This notice provides guidance regarding the application of §§ 101(j) and 264(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) to life insurance contracts that are subject to split-dollar life insurance arrangements. Specifically, this notice provides that a modification of a split-dollar life insurance arrangement that does not entail any change to the life insurance contract underlying the arrangement will not be treated as a material change in the life insurance contract for purposes of §§ 101(j) and 264(f).

Both §§ 101(j) and 264(f) apply to “life insurance contracts,” which are defined in § 7702 for all purposes of the Internal Revenue Code as any contract that is a life insurance contract under the applicable law, but only if such a contract either meets the cash value accumulation test of § 7702(b), or both meets the guideline premium requirements of § 7702(c) and falls within the cash value corridor of § 7702(d). Under § 7702, the term “life insurance contract” generally does not encompass the terms of an arrangement, such as a split-dollar arrangement, of which the contract is a part. Accordingly, if the parties to a split-dollar life insurance arrangement modify the terms of the arrangement but do not modify the terms of the life insurance contract underlying the arrangement, the modification will not be treated as a material change in the life insurance contract for purposes of §§ 101(j) and 264(f), even if the modification is treated as a material modification of the split-dollar arrangement for purposes of § 1.61-22(j).

The principal author of this notice is Linda K. Boyd of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products). For further information regarding this notice, contact Ms. Boyd at (202) 622-3970 (not a toll-free call).

This notice provides guidance to practitioners concerning contingent fees under Treasury Department Circular No. 230, 31 C.F.R. part 10 (Circular 230). Specifically, this notice provides interim guidance clarifying when a practitioner may charge a contingent fee under section 10.27(b)(2) of Circular 230 for services rendered in connection with any matter before the Internal Revenue Service.

The Treasury Department and the IRS intend to revise section 10.27 to reflect the clarifications described in this notice. The IRS will follow the interim rules in this notice for purposes of enforcing section 10.27 until further guidance is provided.

In general, 31 U.S.C. section 330 authorizes the Secretary to regulate attorneys, certified public accountants, enrolled agents, enrolled actuaries, and others who practice before the Service. Regulations under section 330 are promulgated in 31 C.F.R. part 10 and are reprinted as Treasury Department Circular No. 230.

On September 26, 2007, the Treasury Department and the IRS published final regulations (T.D. 9359, 2007-45 I.R.B. 931) in the Federal Register (72 FR 54540) modifying rules governing the general standards of practice before the IRS. These final regulations generally preclude a practitioner from charging a contingent fee for services rendered in connection with any matter before the Internal Revenue Service, including the preparation or filing of a tax return, amended tax return or claim for refund or credit.

The final regulations, however, permit a practitioner to charge a contingent fee for services rendered in connection with the IRS examination of, or challenge to, (i) an original tax return, or (ii) an amended return or claim for refund or credit when the amended return or claim for refund or credit was filed within 120 days of the taxpayer receiving a written notice of the examination of, or a written challenge to, the original tax return. Contingent fees are also permitted for interest and penalty reviews and for services rendered in connection with a judicial proceeding arising under the Internal Revenue Code. The final amendments to section 10.27 made by the final regulations apply to fee arrangements entered into after March 26, 2008.

Section 406 of the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, Pub. L. No. 109-432 (120 Stat. 2958) (the Act), which was enacted on December 20, 2006, amended section 7623 of the Internal Revenue Code concerning the payment of awards to certain persons who detect underpayments of tax. Prior statutory authority to pay awards at the discretion of the Secretary was re-designated as section 7623(a), and a new section 7623(b) was added to the Code. Additional off-Code provisions in section 406 of the Act established a Whistleblower Office within the IRS and addressed reward program administration issues. See Notice 2008-4, 2008-2 I.R.B. 253, for interim guidance applicable to award claims submitted under the authority of section 7623(b).

Several practitioners have contacted the Treasury Department and the IRS to request a clarification of the exception in section 10.27(b)(2)(ii) of Circular 230 permitting a practitioner to charge a contingent fee for services rendered in connection with an IRS examination of, or challenge to, an amended return or claim for refund or credit when the amended return or claim for refund or credit was filed within 120 days of the taxpayer receiving a written notice of the examination of, or a written challenge to, the original tax return. Specifically, the practitioners are concerned that the “within 120 days of the taxpayer receiving a written notice of the examination of, or a written challenge to the original tax return” language in section 10.27(b)(2)(ii) requires the IRS to furnish the written notice of examination to a taxpayer as a prerequisite to a practitioner charging a contingent fee. Other practitioners contacted the Treasury Department and the IRS to discuss whether section 10.27 permits practitioners to charge a contingent fee with respect to whistleblower claims under section 7623.

In response to these requests, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that section 10.27(b)(2) should be clarified and amended. Accordingly, the IRS will apply the following interim rules as revised below under section 10.27(b)(2) until the Treasury Department and the IRS amend the regulations:

§ 10.27 Fees.

* * * * *

(b) * * *

(2) A practitioner may charge a contingent fee for services rendered in connection with the Service’s examination of, or challenge to—

(i) An original tax return; or

(ii) An amended return or claim for refund or credit filed before the taxpayer received a written notice of examination of, or a written challenge to, the original tax return; or filed no later than 120 days after the receipt of such written notice or written challenge. The 120 days is computed from the earlier of a written notice of the examination, if any, or a written challenge to the original return.

(3) A practitioner may charge a contingent fee for services rendered in connection with a claim for credit or refund filed solely in connection with the determination of statutory interest or penalties assessed by the Internal Revenue Service.

(4) A practitioner may charge a contingent fee for services rendered in connection with a claim under section 7623 of the Internal Revenue Code.

(5) A practitioner may charge a contingent fee for services rendered in connection with any judicial proceeding arising under the Internal Revenue Code.

* * * * *

These interim rules regarding contingent fees are applicable to fee arrangements entered into after March 26, 2008.

The principal author of this notice is Matthew S. Cooper of the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration). For further information regarding this notice, contact Matthew S. Cooper at 202-622-4940 (not a toll-free call).

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

Notice of proposed rulemaking by cross-reference to temporary regulations.

In this issue of the Bulletin, the IRS is issuing temporary regulations (T.D. 9383) concerning the treatment of certain intercompany gains with respect to member stock within a consolidated group. The text of those regulations also serves as the text of these proposed regulations. These regulations affect corporations filing consolidated returns.

Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing must be received by June 5, 2008.

Send submissions to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-137573-07), room 5203, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand-delivered Monday through Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-137573-07), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224, or sent electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov (IRS REG-137573-07).

Concerning the proposed regulations, John F. Tarrant or Ross E. Poulsen, (202) 622-7790; concerning submission of comments and/or requests for a public hearing, Kelly Banks, (202) 622-0932 (not toll-free numbers).

Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed to be amended as follows:

The principal author of these regulations is John F. Tarrant, Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate). However, other personnel from the IRS and Treasury Department participated in their development.

* * * * *

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

Correcting amendments.

This document contains corrections to final and temporary regulations (T.D. 9368, 2008-6 I.R.B. 382) that were published in the Federal Register on Friday, December 21, 2007 (72 FR 72582) regarding the reduction of the number of separate foreign tax credit limitation categories under section 904(d) of the Internal Revenue Code. These regulations affect taxpayers claiming foreign tax credits and provide guidance needed to comply with the statutory changes made by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA).

The correction is effective March 21, 2008.

Jeffrey L. Parry, (202) 622-3850 (not a toll-free number).

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed rulemaking by cross-reference to temporary regulations.

This document cancels a public hearing on proposed rulemaking by cross-reference to temporary regulations (REG-141399-07, 2008-8 I.R.B. 470) providing guidance relating to the recapture of overall foreign and domestic losses.

The public hearing, originally scheduled for April 10, 2008, at 10 a.m., is cancelled.

Richard A. Hurst of the Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration), at Richard.A.Hurst@irscounsel.treas.gov.

A notice of public hearing that appeared in the Federal Register on Friday, December 21, 2007 (72 FR 72646), announced that a public hearing was scheduled for April 10, 2008, at 10 a.m., in the auditorium, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC. The subject of the public hearing is under section 904 of the Internal Revenue Code.

The public comment period for these regulations expired on March 20, 2008. Outlines of topics to be discussed at the hearing were due on March 20, 2008. The notice of proposed rulemaking by cross-reference to temporary regulations and notice of public hearing instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit an outline of the topics to be addressed. As of Friday, March 21, 2008, no one has requested to speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for April 10, 2008, is cancelled.