The collection of information contained in this notice of proposed rulemaking has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for review and approval under OMB control number 1545-0047, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)). Comments on the collection of information should be sent to the Office of Management and Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for the Department of the Treasury, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC 20503, with copies to the Internal Revenue Service, Attn: IRS Reports Clearance Officer, SE:W:CAR:MP:T:T:SP, Washington, DC 20224. Comments on the collection of information should be received by June 4, 2013.

Comments are specifically requested concerning:

Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Internal Revenue Service, including whether the information will have practical utility;

The accuracy of the estimated burden associated with the proposed collection of information;

How the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected may be enhanced;

How the burden of complying with the proposed collection of information may be minimized, including through forms of information technology; and

Estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.

The collection of information in these proposed regulations is in §1.501(r)-3 and §1.6033-2(a)(2)(ii)(l). The collection of information flows from sections 501(r)(3) and 6033(b)(15) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code), which require a hospital organization to conduct a CHNA and adopt an implementation strategy to meet the community health needs identified through the CHNA at least once every three years, report on its annual information return how it is meeting the needs identified through the CHNA, and attach to its annual information return a copy of its audited financial statements. The expected recordkeepers are hospital organizations described in sections 501(c)(3) and 501(r)(2).

The following estimates are based on information that is available to the IRS and averaged over a three-year time period, to reflect the fact that the information collection generally will be spread over the statutory three-year cycle during which a hospital organization is required to conduct a CHNA and adopt an implementation strategy. A particular hospital organization may require more or less time, depending on the circumstances.

Estimated number of recordkeepers: 3,377.

Estimated average annual burden hours per recordkeeper: 80 hours.

Estimated total annual recordkeeping burden: 270,160 hours.

The burden for the collection of information contained in the proposed amendments to §1.6033-2 will be reflected in the burden on Form 990, Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax, after it is revised to require the additional information in the regulation.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid control number assigned by the Office of Management and Budget.

Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and return information are confidential, as required by section 6103.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148 (124 Stat. 119 (2010)) (the “Affordable Care Act”), enacted section 501(r) of the Code, which imposes additional requirements on charitable hospital organizations. Section 501(r)(1) states that a hospital organization described in section 501(r)(2) will not be treated as a tax-exempt organization described in section 501(c)(3) unless the organization meets the requirements of section 501(r)(3) through 501(r)(6). The Affordable Care Act did not otherwise affect the substantive standards for tax exemption that charitable hospital organizations are required to meet under section 501(c)(3).

Section 501(r)(2)(A) defines a hospital organization as: (i) an organization that operates a facility required by a state to be licensed, registered, or similarly recognized as a hospital; and (ii) any other organization that the Secretary determines has the provision of hospital care as its principal function or purpose constituting the basis for its exemption under section 501(c)(3).

Section 501(r)(2)(B)(i) requires a hospital organization that operates more than one hospital facility to meet the requirements of section 501(r) separately with respect to each hospital facility. Section 501(r)(2)(B)(ii) provides that a hospital organization will not be treated as described in section 501(c)(3) with respect to any hospital facility for which the requirements of section 501(r) are not separately met.

Section 501(r)(3) requires a hospital organization to conduct a CHNA at least once every three years and adopt an implementation strategy to meet the community health needs identified through the CHNA. The CHNA must take into account input from persons who represent the broad interests of the community served by the hospital facility, including those with special knowledge of or expertise in public health. The CHNA must also be made widely available to the public.

Section 4959 imposes a $50,000 excise tax on a hospital organization that fails to meet the CHNA requirements for any taxable year. A hospital organization must report the amount of any excise tax imposed on it under section 4959 on its annual information return (that is, Form 990, Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax, and related schedules) pursuant to section 6033(b)(10)(D).

Section 6033(b)(15)(A) requires a hospital organization to report on its Form 990 a description of how the organization is addressing the needs identified in each CHNA and a description of any needs that are not being addressed together with the reasons why the needs are not being addressed.

Section 6033(b)(15)(B) requires a hospital organization to file with its Form 990 a copy of its audited financial statements (or, in the case of an organization the financial statements of which are included in consolidated financial statements with other organizations, its consolidated financial statements).

In May 2010, the Department of the Treasury (“Treasury Department”) and the IRS issued Notice 2010-39, 2010-24 I.R.B. 756 (May 27, 2010), which solicited comments regarding the application of the additional requirements imposed by section 501(r). The Treasury Department and the IRS received approximately 125 comments in response to Notice 2010-39 and considered the comments relating to the consequences for failing a section 501(r) requirement in drafting these proposed regulations. The principal comments considered are discussed in this preamble under Explanation of Provisions.

In July 2011, the Treasury Department and the IRS issued Notice 2011-52, 2011-30 I.R.B. 60 (July 8, 2011), which addressed the CHNA requirements of section 501(r)(3). Notice 2011-52 described provisions related to the CHNA requirements that the Treasury Department and the IRS anticipated would be included in these proposed regulations and solicited comments from the public. Specifically, Notice 2011-52 described anticipated regulatory provisions regarding the documentation of a CHNA, how and when a CHNA is conducted, the community served by a hospital facility, persons representing the broad interests of the community, making a CHNA widely available to the public, the implementation strategy, excise taxes on failures to meet the CHNA requirements, reporting requirements related to CHNAs, and the effective dates of the CHNA provisions. The Treasury Department and the IRS received more than 80 comments in response to Notice 2011-52. The principal comments considered in drafting these proposed regulations on the CHNA requirements are discussed in this preamble under Explanation of Provisions.

Notice 2011-52 provided that hospital organizations could rely on the anticipated regulatory provisions described in the notice for any CHNA made widely available to the public, and any implementation strategy adopted, on or before the date that is six months after the date further guidance regarding the CHNA requirements is issued. Thus, hospital organizations may continue to rely on the interim guidance described in Notice 2011-52 for any CHNA made widely available to the public, and any implementation strategy adopted, on or before October 5, 2013.

On June 26, 2012, the Treasury Department and the IRS published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register (REG-130266-11; 77 FR 38148) (“2012 proposed regulations”) that contains proposed regulations regarding the requirements of section 501(r)(4) (which requires hospitals to establish financial assistance and emergency medical care policies), section 501(r)(5) (which limits the amount hospitals can charge for certain care provided to individuals eligible for financial assistance), and section 501(r)(6) (which prohibits a hospital from engaging in extraordinary collection actions before making reasonable efforts to determine whether an individual is eligible for financial assistance).

The 2012 proposed regulations also provide guidance on the hospital organizations and facilities that must meet the section 501(r) requirements. In particular, the 2012 proposed regulations contain a definitions section that defines “hospital organization,” “hospital facility,” and other key terms used in the regulations. See §1.501(r)-1 of the proposed regulations. In accordance with section 501(r)(2)(A)(i), the 2012 proposed regulations define “hospital organization” as an organization recognized (or seeking to be recognized) as described in section 501(c)(3) that operates one or more hospital facilities, including a hospital facility operated through a disregarded entity. Also in accordance with section 501(r)(2)(A)(i), the 2012 proposed regulations define “hospital facility” as a facility that is required by a state to be licensed, registered, or similarly recognized as a hospital. In addition, the 2012 proposed regulations note that references to a hospital facility taking certain actions are intended to include instances in which the hospital organization operating the hospital facility takes action through, or on behalf of, the hospital facility. These definitions and concepts generally apply for purposes of these proposed regulations on the CHNA requirements and the consequences for failing to meet the section 501(r) requirements, although these proposed regulations make minor amendments to the definitions of “hospital facility” and “hospital organization” contained in the 2012 proposed regulations, as discussed further in the “Explanation of Provisions” section of this preamble.

The comment period for the 2012 proposed regulations closed on September 24, 2012. The Treasury Department and the IRS have received more than 200 comments in response to the 2012 proposed regulations and are continuing to consider these comments as they work toward finalizing those proposed regulations. The Treasury Department and the IRS intend to finalize the 2012 proposed regulations in conjunction with the finalization of these proposed regulations.

These proposed regulations provide guidance on the CHNA requirements of section 501(r)(3), and on the related reporting obligations of section 6033. In addition, these proposed regulations provide guidance on the consequences described in sections 501(r)(1), 501(r)(2)(B), and 4959 for failing to satisfy any of the section 501(r) requirements, including the section 501(r)(4) through 501(r)(6) requirements addressed in the 2012 proposed regulations. These proposed regulations generally do not otherwise provide further guidance regarding the section 501(r)(4) through 501(r)(6) requirements. They do, however, make minor amendments to the definitions of “hospital facility” and “hospital organization” contained in the 2012 proposed regulations and also provide a new definition of “operating” a hospital facility that is applicable for purposes of all of the section 501(r) requirements.

In interpreting the CHNA requirements of section 501(r)(3), the Treasury Department and the IRS sought to preserve hospital facilities’ flexibility to determine the best way to identify and meet the particular health needs of the specific communities they serve while requiring a transparent assessment process with ample opportunity for community input.

Section 4959 imposes a $50,000 excise tax on “a hospital organization to which section 501(r) applies” that fails to meet the requirements of section 501(r)(3) for any taxable year. For purposes of section 501(r), the 2012 proposed regulations define the term “hospital organization” to mean an organization “recognized (or seeking to be recognized) as described in section 501(c)(3)” that operates one or more hospital facilities. These proposed regulations clarify that the section 4959 excise tax will apply to a hospital organization that fails to meet the section 501(r)(3) requirements during a taxable year in which its section 501(c)(3) status is revoked. These proposed regulations do not otherwise change the substance of the “hospital organization” definition contained in the 2012 proposed regulations.

The definition of “hospital facility” in the 2012 proposed regulations provides that multiple buildings operated by a hospital organization under a single state license may be considered a single hospital facility. This special rule for multiple buildings was intended to allow flexibility but has the disadvantage of making it harder for the IRS and the public to understand and to evaluate the information reported on a hospital organization’s Form 990, particularly if multiple buildings under a single state license are reported differently (as a single facility or as multiple facilities) from year to year. To increase the certainty and consistency in the designation of hospital facilities, these proposed regulations amend this definition to provide that multiple buildings operated by a hospital organization under a single state license “are” (rather than “may be”) considered a single hospital facility. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments regarding whether (and under what circumstances) a hospital organization should be able to treat multiple buildings under a single state license as separate hospital facilities for purposes of the CHNA and other section 501(r) requirements and, if so, how certainty and consistency in the designation of hospital facilities can be achieved.

Several commenters recommended that these proposed regulations make clear that a hospital facility operated by an Indian tribe or tribal organization is not subject to the section 501(r) requirements, even if the hospital facility is part of an organization described in section 501(c)(3). These commenters stated that tribal hospital facilities are not typically “required by a state to be licensed, registered, or similarly recognized as a hospital,” as contemplated in section 501(r)(2)(A)(i). The Treasury Department and the IRS note that section 501(r)(2)(A)(i) refers only to a hospital facility licensed or registered by a state, not an Indian tribal government, and that section 7871 does not provide that an Indian tribal government is treated as a state for purposes of section 501(r). Accordingly, pending any future guidance regarding other categories of hospital organizations or facilities, a tribal facility that is not required by a state to be licensed, registered, or similarly recognized as a hospital is not a “hospital facility” for purposes of section 501(r), and a section 501(c)(3) organization will not be considered a “hospital organization” solely as a result of operating such a tribal facility.

Notice 2011-52 stated the intention of the Treasury Department and the IRS to include within the definition of “hospital organization” any organization described in section 501(c)(3) that operates a hospital facility through a joint venture, limited liability company, or other entity treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. Notice 2011-52 also requested comments regarding whether (and under what circumstances) an organization should not be considered to “operate” a hospital facility for purposes of section 501(r) as a result of its owning a small interest (other than a general partner or similar interest) in an entity treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes that operates the hospital facility.

In response to Notice 2011-52, a few commenters recommended that a hospital organization generally should not be considered to operate a hospital facility through a partnership when it holds a minority interest in that partnership. In defining “minority interest,” commenters suggested ownership thresholds ranging from less than 50 percent to less than 20 percent. Commenters stated that a hospital organization with such a minority interest in a hospital facility joint venture would not have the necessary control over the joint venture to ensure that the hospital facility in question complied with the requirements of section 501(r).

Another commenter recommended that section 501(r) should not apply to a hospital facility operated by a partnership if the partner described in section 501(c)(3) treats the income derived from that facility as unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) that is taxed under section 511. This commenter argued that the line on the applicability of section 501(r) should be drawn based on the taxability of the hospital facility’s income rather than on the basis of a particular percentage of ownership.

Yet another commenter suggested that these proposed regulations should provide that an organization that owns a minority limited partnership interest in a partnership that operates a hospital facility should not be considered to “operate” that hospital facility for purposes of section 501(r) if the organization entered into the limited partnership agreement prior to the date section 501(r) was enacted (that is, March 23, 2010) and has a primary tax-exempt purpose other than the provision of community health care. As an example of such an organization, this commenter cited a university medical school that entered into a partnership agreement to operate a hospital facility that gives the university control over the joint venture sufficient to ensure the operation of the hospital facility furthers its exempt educational purpose, but insufficient to ensure the hospital facility is in compliance with section 501(r).

Rev. Rul. 2004-51, 2004-1 C.B. 975, provides that the activities of an entity that is treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes are treated as the activities of the tax-exempt partner for purposes of determining whether the tax-exempt partner is operated exclusively for exempt purposes and engages in an unrelated trade or business. See also Rev. Rul. 98-15, 1998-1 C.B. 718. Consequently, consistent with Notice 2011-52, these proposed regulations provide that, as a general rule, a hospital organization “operates” a hospital facility if it is a partner in a joint venture, limited liability company, or other entity treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes that operates the hospital facility.

However, in light of the comments received, these proposed regulations provide two exceptions to this general rule. First, as commenters observed, an organization without the control over the operation of a hospital facility sufficient to ensure that the hospital facility furthers an exempt purpose is unlikely to have the control sufficient to ensure compliance with section 501(r). As a general rule, if a tax-exempt partner does not have control sufficient to ensure that a trade or business activity regularly carried on by the partnership furthers (or is substantially related to) its exempt purposes, that activity will be considered an unrelated trade or business with respect to the tax-exempt partner. See Rev. Rul. 2004-51; Rev. Rul. 98-15. These proposed regulations provide that if a section 501(c)(3) partner of a partnership operating a hospital facility does not have control over the operation of the hospital facility sufficient to ensure that the operation of the hospital facility furthers an exempt purpose described in section 501(c)(3) and thus treats the operation of the hospital facility, including the facility’s provision of medical care, as an unrelated trade or business, the hospital organization will not be considered to “operate” the hospital facility for purposes of section 501(r).

Second, as another commenter observed, some tax-exempt organizations may have entered into partnership arrangements prior to the enactment of section 501(r) that gave them control over a partnership sufficient to ensure that the partnership furthers charitable purposes other than the provision of community health care, but not sufficient to ensure compliance with section 501(r). In response to this comment, these proposed regulations provide a grandfather rule under which a hospital organization will not be considered to “operate” a hospital facility for purposes of section 501(r) if certain conditions are met. First, at all times since March 23, 2010, the hospital organization must have been organized and operated primarily for educational or scientific purposes and must not have engaged primarily in the operation of one or more hospital facilities. Second, pursuant to a partnership arrangement (including any side agreements) entered into before March 23, 2010, the hospital organization must not own more than 35 percent of the capital or profits interest in the partnership, not own a general partner or similar interest, and not have sufficient control over the operation of the hospital facility to ensure that the hospital facility complies with the requirements of section 501(r).

Finally, like both Notice 2011-52 and the 2012 proposed regulations, these proposed regulations make clear that a hospital organization operates a hospital facility if it operates a hospital facility through a wholly-owned entity that is disregarded as separate from the hospital organization for federal tax purposes.

In response to Notice 2010-39, a few commenters asked whether the requirements of section 501(r) apply to those aspects of a hospital organization’s operations that do not relate to the operation of a hospital facility. Section 501(r)(2)(B) provides that the requirements of section 501(r) apply separately with respect to each of the hospital facilities a hospital organization operates. Similarly, §1.501(r)-2 of these proposed regulations (which describes consequences for failing to satisfy the requirements of section 501(r)) only applies to circumstances in which a hospital organization fails to meet one or more of the requirements of section 501(r) “separately with respect to one or more hospital facilities” it operates. Thus, the Treasury Department and the IRS intend that a hospital organization is not required to meet the requirements of section 501(r) with respect to any activities unrelated to the operation of a hospital facility. For example, if a hospital organization operates a facility that is not required to be licensed as a hospital by the state in which the facility is located, the hospital organization is not required to meet the requirements of section 501(r) with respect to that facility.

For purposes of determining whether a hospital organization has established a policy required under section 501(r)(4) for a hospital facility it operates, the 2012 proposed regulations would require an authorized body to adopt the policy for the hospital facility. The 2012 proposed regulations define the term “authorized body” to include: (1) the governing body (that is, the board of directors, board of trustees, or equivalent controlling body) of the hospital organization; (2) a committee of, or other party authorized by, the governing body of the hospital organization, to the extent permitted under state law; or (3) in the case of a hospital facility that has its own governing body and is recognized as an entity under state law but is a disregarded entity for federal tax purposes, the governing body of that hospital facility, or a committee of, or other party authorized by, that governing body to the extent permitted under state law.

Because the definition of an “authorized body” of a hospital facility that adopts a CHNA report or implementation strategy required under section 501(r)(3) should be the same as the definition of an “authorized body” for purposes of section 501(r)(4), the term “authorized body of a hospital facility” is defined in §1.501(r)-1 of these proposed regulations so that it may apply for purposes of both the section 501(r)(3) and the section 501(r)(4) requirements.

Numerous commenters to Notice 2010-39 requested guidance on the consequences of failing to meet one or more of the requirements of section 501(r). In addition, commenters have noted that the guidance released so far on section 501(r) (in Notice 2011-52 and the 2012 proposed regulations) has proposed multiple specific requirements, and that hospitals, as large complex institutions, may experience minor and inadvertent compliance failures notwithstanding their good faith efforts to comply with the requirements. Commenters representing hospitals expressed the view that a failure to meet a section 501(r) requirement should only result in adverse consequences for a hospital organization if the failure is a substantial one. The Treasury Department and the IRS received similar informal comments from patient advocates. Commenters also recommended that no adverse consequences should result from a hospital organization’s failure if the organization corrects the failure, with many of these commenters specifically suggesting that such corrections be required to be made “by the end of the fiscal year being reported.”

The Treasury Department and the IRS recognize that minor and inadvertent errors may occur even in circumstances in which a hospital facility has practices and procedures in place that are reasonably designed to facilitate overall compliance with section 501(r) and has implemented safeguards reasonably calculated to prevent errors. Therefore, these proposed regulations provide that a hospital facility’s omission of required information from a policy or report described in §1.501(r)-3 or §1.501(r)-4, or error with respect to the implementation or operational requirements described in §1.501(r)-3 through §1.501(r)-6, will not be considered a failure to meet a requirement of section 501(r) if the omission or error was minor, inadvertent, and due to reasonable cause, and the hospital facility corrects such omission or error as promptly after discovery as is reasonable given the nature of the omission or error.

With respect to omissions or errors that rise above the level of minor and inadvertent, the Treasury Department and the IRS recognize that a hospital facility’s prompt discovery and correction of such omissions or errors is in the best interests of patients and that requiring hospital facilities to report such omissions or errors and disclose how such omissions or errors were corrected (for example, on the Form 990) would achieve transparency, which is an important objective of section 501(r). Increased transparency, in turn, will permit organizations concerned with community health needs to use this information to promote adoption of practices and procedures that advance the goals of the section 501(r) requirements and encourage promulgation of best practices. To provide an incentive for hospital facilities to take steps not only to avoid errors but to correct and provide disclosure when they occur, the Treasury Department and the IRS will issue a revenue procedure, notice, or other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin which will provide that a hospital facility’s failure to meet one or more of the requirements described in §1.501(r)-3 through §1.501(r)-6 that is neither willful nor egregious will be excused if the hospital facility corrects and provides disclosure in accordance with the rules set forth in the guidance. The Treasury Department and the IRS anticipate that this guidance will provide that correction and disclosure should be reasonable and appropriate for the failure at issue.

For purposes of this provision, willful is to be interpreted consistent with the meaning of that term in the context of civil penalties, which would include a failure due to gross negligence, reckless disregard, or willful neglect. Furthermore, correction and disclosure will not create a presumption that the failure was neither willful nor egregious.

The Treasury Department and the IRS intend to issue the guidance regarding correction and disclosure in proposed form in order to provide an opportunity to comment on the procedures described therein.

Section 501(r)(1) provides that a hospital organization will not be treated as described in section 501(c)(3) unless it meets the requirements of section 501(r). These proposed regulations interpret this language as giving the IRS the authority to revoke a hospital organization’s section 501(c)(3) status if the organization fails to meet one or more requirements of section 501(r). However, the Treasury Department and the IRS agree with commenters that the IRS should consider the relative size, scope, nature, and significance of any failures to meet the section 501(r) requirements, as well as the reasons for such failures and whether the same type of failures have previously occurred, when determining whether revocation of section 501(c)(3) status is warranted. In addition, the Treasury Department and the IRS consider it desirable that these proposed regulations provide incentives for a hospital facility to establish and routinely follow practices and procedures reasonably designed to promote and facilitate overall compliance with the section 501(r) requirements and identify any problems that arise and the reasons for their occurrence. Hospital facilities should also have incentives to correct any section 501(r) failures as promptly after discovery as is reasonable given the nature of the failure and implement safeguards reasonably calculated to prevent similar failures from occurring in the future. Accordingly, these proposed regulations provide that the IRS will consider all of these facts and circumstances in determining whether to continue to recognize the section 501(c)(3) status of a hospital organization that fails to meet one or more requirements of section 501(r). In general, the Treasury Department and the IRS expect that application of these facts and circumstances will ordinarily result in revocation of the section 501(c)(3) status of a hospital organization if the organization’s failures to meet the requirements of section 501(r) are willful or egregious.

A number of commenters recommended that if a hospital organization fails to meet a section 501(r) requirement with respect to a particular hospital facility it operates, only that hospital facility should be treated as not described in section 501(c)(3), and the facility’s failure should not negate the tax exemption of the hospital organization as a whole. A few commenters recommended that if a hospital organization ceases to qualify as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) with respect to a particular hospital facility but continues to qualify as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) overall, then any net income derived from the disqualified facility should be subject to the unrelated business income tax under section 511.

Section 501(r)(2)(B)(ii) provides that a hospital organization operating more than one hospital facility shall not be treated as described in section 501(c)(3) with respect to any such hospital facility for which the requirements of section 501(r)(1) are not separately met (a “noncompliant hospital facility”). Status under section 501(c)(3) is determined at the organizational level, and treating an organization as not described in section 501(c)(3) “with respect to” a particular hospital facility it operates (or a particular branch, division, or activity of the organization) has no generally recognized meaning under the provisions of the Code governing tax-exempt organizations. Notwithstanding this fact, the language in section 501(r)(2)(B)(ii) suggests that a particular noncompliant hospital facility operated by a hospital organization with more than one facility may be treated as not described in section 501(c)(3) without affecting the section 501(c)(3) status of the hospital organization. A noncompliant hospital facility that is treated as not described in section 501(c)(3), but that is owned and operated by a hospital organization that continues to be described in section 501(c)(3), cannot be described in another subsection of 501(c) (such as section 501(c)(4)), since the plain language of section 501(c) makes clear that only organizations (not facilities, branches, divisions, or other components of organizations) can be described in any one subsection of 501(c). Thus, these proposed regulations interpret section 501(r)(2)(B)(ii) to mean that a hospital organization that is not treated as described in section 501(c)(3) “with respect to” a particular noncompliant hospital facility ceases to be exempt from taxation under section 501(a) with respect to that facility, even while the hospital organization as a whole (with respect to its other hospital facilities and activities) continues to be otherwise exempt from taxation under section 501(a) because it is described in section 501(c)(3).

Accordingly, these proposed regulations provide that if a hospital organization operating more than one hospital facility fails to meet one or more of the requirements of section 501(r) separately with respect to a hospital facility during a taxable year but continues to be recognized as described in section 501(c)(3), the income derived from the noncompliant hospital facility during that taxable year will be subject to tax computed as provided in section 11 (or as provided in section 1(e) if the hospital organization is a trust described in section 511(b)(2)). To maintain consistency with the treatment of organizations operating a single hospital facility, this tax will apply only if the hospital organization would not continue to be described in section 501(c)(3) based on the facts and circumstances described in section 2.c of this preamble if the noncompliant hospital facility were the only hospital facility that the organization operated. This tax would not apply in the event of minor and inadvertent omissions or errors described in section 2.a of this preamble or of failures that are excused in accordance with the guidance described in section 2.b of this preamble.

In applying the tax, the income derived from a noncompliant hospital facility during a taxable year will be the gross income derived from that hospital facility during the taxable year, less the deductions allowed by chapter 1 of the Code that are directly connected to the operation of that hospital facility during the taxable year. These proposed regulations provide that this computation will exclude any gross income and deductions already taken into account in computing any UBTI described in section 512 derived from the facility during the taxable year.

To be directly connected with the operation of a noncompliant hospital facility, these proposed regulations provide that an item of deduction must have proximate and primary relationship to the operation of the hospital facility. Expenses, depreciation, and similar items attributable solely to the operation of a hospital facility are proximately and primarily related to such operation, and therefore qualify for deduction to the extent that they meet the requirements of section 162, section 167, or other relevant provisions of the Code. These proposed regulations further provide that where expenses, depreciation, and similar items are attributable to more than one hospital facility operated by the hospital organization (and/or to activities of the hospital organization unrelated to the operation of hospital facilities), such items shall be allocated between the hospital facilities (and/or other activities) on a reasonable basis.

In addition, these proposed regulations provide the gross income and allowed deductions of a noncompliant hospital facility may not be aggregated with the gross income and allowed deductions of the hospital organization’s other noncompliant hospital facilities or its unrelated trade or business activities described in section 513. Thus, a hospital organization operating more than one noncompliant hospital facility that is subject to the facility-level tax must compute each facility’s taxable income separately and may not use net operating losses from one noncompliant hospital facility to offset taxable income derived from another noncompliant hospital facility. Similarly, a hospital organization may not use net operating losses from a noncompliant hospital facility to offset any UBTI derived from the organization’s unrelated trade or business activities.

A number of commenters expressed concern that interest on bonds issued as qualified 501(c)(3) bonds to finance a hospital facility will become taxable if the facility fails one or more requirements of section 501(r). These proposed regulations make clear that if a hospital organization operating a noncompliant hospital facility continues to be recognized as described in section 501(c)(3) and otherwise exempt from tax under section 501(a), the fact that a facility-level tax is imposed as a result of the facility’s failure to comply with section 501(r) will not itself cause the interest on such bonds to be taxable.

Finally, these proposed regulations make clear that the facility-level tax described in this section 2.d of the preamble will be reported on the Form 990-T.

Consistent with section 501(r)(3)(A), these proposed regulations provide that a hospital organization meets the requirements of section 501(r)(3) in any taxable year with respect to a hospital facility it operates only if the hospital facility has conducted a CHNA in such taxable year or in either of the two immediately preceding taxable years and an authorized body of the hospital facility has adopted an implementation strategy to meet the community health needs identified through the CHNA by the end of the taxable year in which the hospital facility conducts the CHNA. In general, these proposed regulations are consistent with the anticipated rules described in Notice 2011-52, with certain modifications intended to be responsive to the more than 80 comments received on Notice 2011-52.

In conducting a CHNA, these proposed regulations provide that a hospital facility must define the community it serves and assess the health needs of that community. In assessing the community’s health needs, the hospital facility must, consistent with section 501(r)(3)(B)(i), take into account input from persons who represent the broad interests of its community, including those with special knowledge of or expertise in public health. The hospital facility must also document the CHNA in a written report (“CHNA report”) that is adopted for the hospital facility by an authorized body of the hospital facility. Finally, consistent with section 501(r)(3)(B)(ii), the hospital facility must make the CHNA report widely available to the public. These proposed regulations provide that a CHNA is considered “conducted” on the date the hospital facility has completed all of these steps. Because a hospital facility must make a CHNA report widely available to the public continuously for a number of years (as discussed in section 3.a.vi of this preamble), these proposed regulations clarify that a hospital facility is considered to have completed the step of making the CHNA report widely available to the public on the date it first makes the CHNA report widely available to the public.

Notice 2011-52 stated the intention of the Treasury Department and the IRS to allow a hospital facility to take into account all of the relevant facts and circumstances in defining the community it serves. Notice 2011-52 noted that, generally, the Treasury Department and the IRS would expect a hospital facility’s community to be defined geographically but that, in some cases, the definition might also take into account target populations served or specialized functions. Notwithstanding this generally flexible approach to defining community, Notice 2011-52 stated that a community could not be defined in a manner that circumvented the requirement to assess the health needs of the hospital facility’s community by excluding, for example, medically underserved populations, low-income persons, minority groups, or those with chronic disease needs. Finally, Notice 2011-52 requested comments on the relative merits of different geographically-based definitions of community and, more specifically, on whether future guidance should define the geographic community of a hospital facility as the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Micropolitan Statistical Area (µSA) in which the facility is located or, if the hospital facility is a rural facility not located in a MSA or µSA, as the county in which the facility is located.

Many commenters supported the facts-and-circumstances approach to defining a hospital facility’s community outlined in Notice 2011-52 and recommended against a definition based on specified geographic boundaries. These commenters noted that each hospital facility is in the best position to determine its community and that requiring the community to be defined as a specific geographic area may not be appropriate or correspond to the actual populations served, especially in the case of specialized and regional hospitals. These commenters also recommended against defining the community served by a hospital facility as the MSA, µSA, or county in which the facility is located, noting that such areas or politically-defined jurisdictions are often unrelated to hospital service areas.

Other commenters recommended a geographic definition of community, but requested one that would be flexible in the method of definition (for example, not restricted to specific political jurisdictions). A few commenters went further and stated that the geographic definition of community should include the political jurisdiction in which the hospital facility is located or where the hospital facility is an essential provider. These commenters recommended against definitions of community based on the demographics or residence of the hospital facility’s specific patient populations, noting that a hospital facility’s current patient population does not necessarily reflect the broader community.

Consistent with Notice 2011-52, these proposed regulations provide a hospital facility with the flexibility to take into account all of the relevant facts and circumstances in defining the community it serves, including the geographic area served by the hospital facility, target populations served (for example, children, women, or the aged), and principal functions (for example, focus on a particular specialty area or targeted disease). These proposed regulations also clarify that a hospital facility may define its community to include populations in addition to its patient populations and geographic areas outside of those in which its patient populations reside. For example, a hospital facility collaborating with other hospital facilities in its MSA in conducting a CHNA may define its community as the entire MSA in which all of the collaborating hospital facilities are located, even if the hospital facility itself only generally serves and draws its patients from a portion of that MSA.

While desiring to give a hospital facility the flexibility it needs to define its community served in a manner appropriate to its specific facts and circumstances, the Treasury Department and the IRS continue to share the interest expressed by some commenters in ensuring that hospital facilities assess and address the needs of medically underserved, low-income, and minority populations in the areas they serve. Thus, similar to the restriction included in Notice 2011-52, these proposed regulations provide that a hospital facility may not define its community in a way that excludes medically underserved, low-income, or minority populations who are part of its patient populations, live in geographic areas in which its patient populations reside (unless they are not part of the hospital facility’s target populations or affected by its principal functions), or otherwise should be included based on the method used by the hospital facility to define its community. These proposed regulations clarify that medically underserved populations include populations experiencing health disparities or at risk of not receiving adequate medical care as a result of being uninsured or underinsured or due to geographic, language, financial, or other barriers. (For reasons discussed in section 3.a.iii.B of this preamble, these proposed regulations do not list those with chronic disease needs as a separate category of persons that must not be excluded.) Finally, if a hospital facility uses a method of defining its community that takes into account patient populations, these proposed regulations require the hospital facility to treat as patients all individuals who receive care from the hospital facility, without regard to whether (or how much) they or their insurers pay for the care received or whether they are eligible for financial assistance.

These proposed regulations provide that in order to “assess” the health needs of the community it serves, a hospital facility must identify significant health needs of the community, prioritize those health needs, and identify potential measures and resources (such as programs, organizations, and facilities in the community) available to address the health needs. For these purposes, health needs include requisites for the improvement or maintenance of health status in both the community at large and in particular parts of the community (such as particular neighborhoods or populations experiencing health disparities). Requisites for the improvement or maintenance of health status in a community may include improving access to care by removing financial and other barriers to care, such as a lack of information regarding sources of insurance designed to benefit vulnerable populations.

Notice 2011-52 stated the intention of the Treasury Department and the IRS to require a hospital facility to prioritize all of the community health needs identified through the CHNA. A few commenters suggested that only the most significant of the likely extensive list of community health needs identified through a CHNA should have to be prioritized. These proposed regulations respond to this comment by clarifying that a CHNA need only identify significant health needs and need only prioritize, and otherwise assess, those significant health needs identified. A hospital facility may determine whether a health need is significant based on all of the facts and circumstances present in the community it serves.

A few commenters asked for additional guidance regarding how a CHNA should prioritize community health needs. These proposed regulations do not require a hospital facility to use any particular methods or criteria in prioritizing health needs. They do, however, list as possible examples of prioritization criteria the burden, scope, severity, or urgency of the health need; the estimated feasibility and effectiveness of possible interventions; the health disparities associated with the need; and/or the importance the community places on addressing the need. This list of possible prioritization criteria is not intended to be exhaustive, and a hospital facility may use any criteria it deems appropriate.

In assessing the health needs of the community it serves, these proposed regulations require a hospital facility to (consistent with section 501(r)(3)(B)(i)) take into account input from persons who represent the broad interests of the community served by the hospital facility, including those with special knowledge of or expertise in public health. Specifically, these proposed regulations require a hospital facility to take into account input from, at a minimum: (1) at least one state, local, tribal, or regional governmental public health department (or equivalent department or agency) with knowledge, information, or expertise relevant to the health needs of the community; (2) members of medically underserved, low-income, and minority populations in the community, or individuals or organizations serving or representing the interests of such populations; and (3) written comments received on the hospital facility’s most recently conducted CHNA and most recently adopted implementation strategy.

Notice 2011-52 stated that the Treasury Department and the IRS intended to require a CHNA to take into account input from, at a minimum: (1) persons with special knowledge of or expertise in public health; (2) federal, tribal, regional, state, or local health or other departments or agencies, with current data or other information relevant to the health needs of the community served by the hospital facility; and (3) leaders, representatives, or members of medically underserved, low-income, and minority populations, and populations with chronic disease needs, in the community served by the hospital facility.

With respect to the requirement described in Notice 2011-52 to take into account input from federal, tribal, regional, state, or local health or other departments, many commenters urged that a hospital facility should be able to choose the level and type of governmental public health department from which it seeks input, noting that not every local jurisdiction has a local public health department. On the other hand, a number of public health organizations suggested that these proposed regulations should require a hospital facility to consult with the state public health department in the state where the hospital facility is licensed and/or the local public health department in the local jurisdiction where the hospital facility is located. These organizations noted that such departments can play a critically important role in coordinating CHNA efforts and provide expertise in CHNA planning and execution, access to existing health data, and knowledge of local conditions, needs, and resources.

These proposed regulations preserve the flexibility in Notice 2011-52 of allowing a hospital facility to choose the jurisdictional level of government (for example, state, local, tribal, or regional) that it feels is most appropriate for its CHNA. These proposed regulations do not require a hospital facility to seek input from a local public health department, in particular, in recognition of some commenters’ observation that not all jurisdictions will have local public health departments available to participate in the CHNA process. However, in recognition of the planning and subject-matter expertise that public health departments can offer to the CHNA process, a hospital facility is required to seek input from a public health department (or equivalent department or agency) in particular, rather than any governmental departments with current data or other information relevant to the health needs of the community (as described in Notice 2011-52). Such input could include input from the state public health official or any local public health official.

In addition, given commenters’ emphasis on the importance of input from public health departments at the state or local level, these proposed regulations require a hospital facility to seek input from a public health department at a state or local, not a federal, level. Because a governmental public health department presumably has special knowledge of or expertise in public health, requiring input from a public health department eliminates the need for a separate requirement to consult with a person with special knowledge of or expertise in public health (as provided in Notice 2011-52).

Commenters generally supported the purpose behind the requirement to take into account input from medically underserved, low-income, and minority populations in the community but asked for clarification on who may be considered “leaders” or “representatives” of such populations. One commenter noted that the term “chronic disease needs” is broad and could potentially require a hospital facility to seek input from a large number of individuals in order to address every chronic disease in its community.

These proposed regulations maintain the requirement to take into account input from medically underserved, low-income, and minority populations in the community served by the hospital facility but respond to comments by clarifying and simplifying the approach taken in Notice 2011-52. To address the numerous comments expressing confusion over the terms “leaders” and “representatives” of such populations, these proposed regulations clarify that a hospital facility may seek input either directly from members of medically underserved, low-income, and minority populations in the community (for example, in the form of meetings, focus groups, surveys, or interviews) or from individuals or organizations serving or representing the interests of those populations. To address the concern with requiring input related to every chronic disease in a community, these proposed regulations do not refer to chronic disease needs in particular but rather define “medically underserved populations” in a manner that focuses on disparities in coverage, access, and other barriers to care for persons with health needs that may include, but are not limited to, chronic diseases.

A few commenters recommended an input requirement not contained in Notice 2011-52: a requirement that a hospital facility take into account public input and comments on a draft version of its CHNA report before the report is finalized. These commenters noted the importance of a public comment process for ensuring that the CHNA accurately reflects the community’s views and priorities and adequately analyzes available data.

These proposed regulations do not adopt the specific recommendations to require hospital facilities to make a draft copy of a CHNA report available for public comment due to the complexity of the additional timeframes and procedures such a process would require. However, the Treasury Department and the IRS recognize the value of providing a mechanism for public feedback on CHNA reports and their related implementation strategies. Therefore, these proposed regulations respond to these comments by requiring a hospital facility to consider written comments received from the public on the hospital facility’s most recently conducted CHNA and most recently adopted implementation strategy. (As discussed in section 4 of this preamble, the public will be able to review a hospital facility’s most recently adopted implementation strategy because it will either be attached to the Form 990 of the hospital organization that operates it or made widely available on a Web site.) Because a new CHNA must be conducted and an implementation strategy adopted at least once every three years, this requirement establishes the same sort of continual feedback on CHNA reports suggested by commenters, albeit over a longer period of time. It is anticipated that this opportunity for feedback on CHNA reports and implementation strategies will result in a meaningful exchange over time and that the longer timeframe will give the public sufficient time to provide comments and hospital facilities sufficient time to consider the public’s comments and take the comments into account when conducting their next CHNA. In addition, as discussed in section 3.a.vi of this preamble, to help facilitate the option of posting a draft CHNA report for public review and comment, these proposed regulations provide that the posting of draft CHNA reports will not trigger the start of a hospital facility’s next three-year CHNA cycle.

In addition, some commenters recommended that a hospital facility should be required to integrate evaluations of financial assistance policies and procedures and the need for uncompensated care into its CHNA. The Treasury Department and the IRS recognize that the need to improve access to care by removing financial barriers can be among the significant health needs assessed in a CHNA. Accordingly, these proposed regulations provide that input from persons representing the broad interests of the community includes, but is not limited to, input on any financial and other barriers to access to care in the community.

Finally, similar to Notice 2011-52, these proposed regulations provide that a hospital facility may take into account input from a broad range of persons located in or serving its community who may have special knowledge of or expertise in public health, including, but not limited to, health care consumers and consumer advocates, nonprofit and community-based organizations, academic experts, local government officials, local school districts, health care providers and community health centers, health insurance and managed care organizations, private businesses, and labor and workforce representatives. As discussed in section 3.a.vi of this preamble, one way for a hospital facility to take into account input from such a broad range of persons is to pursue the option of posting on its Web site a draft CHNA report for public review and comment. The Treasury Department and the IRS believe a CHNA with broad input from the community can increase the likelihood of well-targeted initiatives that address the needs of communities and improve the health of residents.

Similar to the documentation rule described in Notice 2011-52, these proposed regulations provide that a hospital facility must document its CHNA in a CHNA report that is adopted by an authorized body of the hospital facility and includes: (1) a definition of the community served by the hospital facility and a description of how the community was determined; (2) a description of the process and methods used to conduct the CHNA; (3) a description of how the hospital facility took into account input from persons who represent the broad interests of the community it serves; (4) a prioritized description of the significant health needs of the community identified through the CHNA, along with a description of the process and criteria used in identifying certain health needs as significant and prioritizing such significant health needs; and (5) a description of potential measures and resources identified through the CHNA to address the significant health needs.

Like Notice 2011-52, the proposed regulations provide more detail about two of these required elements of the CHNA report: the description of the process and methods used to conduct the CHNA and the description of how the hospital facility took into account input from persons who represent the broad interests of the community. However, in response to comments about the need for greater flexibility, these proposed regulations provide that a hospital facility’s CHNA report “will be considered to” describe each of these elements if it contains certain information instead of prescribing a single method of meeting the requirement.

These proposed regulations provide that a hospital facility’s CHNA report will be considered to describe the process and methods used to conduct the CHNA if the CHNA report: (1) describes the data and other information used in the assessment, as well as the methods of collecting and analyzing this data and information, and (2) identifies any parties with whom the hospital facility collaborated, or with whom it contracted for assistance, in conducting the CHNA.

In describing how the hospital facility took into account input from persons who represent the broad interests of the community it serves, Notice 2011-52 stated that a hospital facility would have to describe when and how the organization consulted with such persons. A number of commenters sought clarification that a general summary of “when and how” would be sufficient. Specifically, some of these commenters noted that a detailed account of each instance of feedback could be quite burdensome and may create the impression that less formal interactions with community members are insufficient or unworthy of consideration or hinder the free flow of information.

In response to these comments, these proposed regulations clarify that the CHNA report may summarize, in general terms, how and over what time period input was provided (for example, whether through meetings, focus groups, interviews, surveys, or written comments and between what dates) and need not provide a detailed description of each instance of feedback. These proposed regulations also clarify that the CHNA report may contain a general summary of the input received. Thus, for example, a hospital facility may describe a series of town hall meetings by noting that four meetings were held over a three-month period and generally summarizing the input received, without necessarily having to provide the specific dates of each meeting, a list of attendees, or minutes of the discussion.

Notice 2011-52 stated that a hospital facility taking into account input from an organization would be required to identify in the CHNA report not only the organization but also the name and title of at least one individual in the organization with whom the hospital facility consulted. Commenters, however, were generally opposed to inclusion in the publicly available CHNA report of the names and roles of private individuals who gave input into the CHNA process, noting that the information may not add much value to the overall CHNA but could raise privacy concerns and deter individuals from providing input. In response to these comments, these proposed regulations do not specifically require the CHNA report to contain the names or titles of any individuals contacted within an organization. In addition, the proposed regulations specify that a CHNA report does not need to name or otherwise individually identify any individuals participating in community forums, focus groups, survey samples, or similar groups.

However, the Treasury Department and the IRS continue to believe that a CHNA report should identify the organizations that provided input into the CHNA and summarize the nature and extent of that input. In addition, a CHNA report should describe the medically underserved, low-income, or minority populations being represented by the organizations or individuals providing input. Accordingly, these proposed regulations provide that a hospital facility’s CHNA report will be considered to describe how the hospital facility took into account input if the CHNA report: (1) summarizes, in general terms, the input provided and how and over what time period such input was provided; (2) provides the names of organizations providing input and summarizes the nature and extent of the organization’s input; and (3) describes the medically underserved, low-income, or minority populations being represented by organizations or individuals providing input.

The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments regarding whether these proposed rules provide for sufficient disclosure regarding the community input into a CHNA report, or whether the CHNA report should be required to provide any other information regarding input provided, in order to ensure transparency in the CHNA process.

With respect to the requirement in Notice 2011-52 to describe the existing health care facilities and other resources within the community available to meet the health needs identified through the CHNA, many commenters asked that the description of these resources be limited to known or available facilities and resources. These commenters argued that a community-wide inventory of health care resources is not the responsibility of any one hospital facility, but rather a task more appropriate to public health departments. Accordingly, these proposed regulations limit the description of resources available to address health needs to those known or identified in the course of conducting the CHNA.

Additional commenters remarked that both the prioritization of health needs and a description of resources available to meet the health needs identified through the CHNA are more appropriate in an implementation strategy than in a CHNA report. On the other hand, other commenters noted the importance of community input in the overall CHNA process and sought an opportunity to provide input on potential interventions and programs that may be included in a hospital facility’s implementation strategy. In fact, such commenters asked that the implementation strategy, in addition to the CHNA, be subject to public input and made widely available to the public.

The Treasury Department and the IRS recognize that conducting a CHNA and developing an implementation strategy are part of one fluid process, with no definite point at which the CHNA ends and the implementation strategy begins. Prioritizing health needs and identifying potential measures and resources to address health needs, for example, could reasonably be interpreted as part of “assessing” those health needs or, alternatively, as the first step in devising a strategy to meet those needs. Accordingly, these proposed regulations respond to commenters’ requests for enhanced transparency and an opportunity for community input by requiring items that could reasonably be included as part of either the CHNA or the implementation strategy to be described in the CHNA report. Thus, these proposed regulations require the CHNA report to include a prioritized description of the significant health needs of the community identified through the CHNA, along with a description of the process and criteria used in prioritizing these health needs. These proposed regulations also require the CHNA report to include a description of the potential measures and resources identified through the CHNA to address the significant health needs.

Notice 2011-52 stated that the Treasury Department and the IRS intend to allow a hospital organization to conduct a CHNA in collaboration with other organizations, including related organizations, other hospital organizations, for-profit and government hospitals, and public health and other departments of state and local governments. However, even in cases where collaboration between hospitals occurs, Notice 2011-52 stated that the Treasury Department and the IRS intended to require each hospital facility to document its CHNA in a separate written report. Many commenters recommended that when several hospital facilities within the same defined community work collaboratively on a CHNA, they should be able to issue a joint CHNA report or separate CHNA reports that are substantively identical. These commenters argued that joint reporting would encourage collaboration, reduce redundancy and expense, and provide a more coherent picture of the community’s health needs. Some of these commenters suggested that the joint CHNA report could be required to contain different sections for each particular hospital facility. On the other hand, other commenters recommended retaining the requirement for separate CHNA reports, noting that facility-level reporting ensures that information for each hospital facility is clearly presented and easily accessible.

In balancing these concerns, these proposed regulations provide, generally, that every hospital facility must document its CHNA in a separate CHNA report. However, these proposed regulations provide that if a hospital facility is collaborating with other facilities and organizations in conducting its CHNA or is basing its CHNA, in part, on a CHNA for all or part of its community conducted by another organization, portions of the hospital facility’s CHNA report may be substantively identical to the CHNA report of a collaborating hospital facility or the other organization conducting a CHNA, if appropriate under the facts and circumstances. For example, if a hospital facility conducts a survey of the health needs of residents of homeless shelters located in the community in collaboration with other hospital facilities, the description of that survey in the hospital facility’s CHNA report may be identical to the description contained in the CHNA reports for the other collaborating hospital facilities. Similarly, if the state or local public health department with jurisdiction over the community served by the hospital facility conducts an inventory of community health improvement resources available in that community, the hospital facility may include that inventory in its CHNA report.

These proposed regulations also provide an exception to the general requirement of separate CHNA reports: namely, if a hospital facility collaborates with other hospital facilities in conducting its CHNA, all of the collaborating hospital facilities may produce a joint CHNA report as long as all of the facilities define their community to be the same and conduct a joint CHNA process. In addition, the joint CHNA report must clearly identify each hospital facility to which it applies and an authorized body of each collaborating hospital facility must adopt the joint CHNA report as its own.

Thus, for example, if a hospital facility collaborates with nine other hospital facilities that are all located in and serving a particular MSA, all ten hospital facilities define their community as constituting the entire MSA, and all ten hospital facilities conduct a joint CHNA process, the ten hospital facilities may prepare a joint CHNA report that identifies all of the collaborating hospital facilities by name. Under these proposed regulations, such a joint CHNA report would satisfy the requirement to document the CHNA in a written CHNA report for any one of the collaborating hospital facilities as long as the joint CHNA report is adopted by an authorized body of the hospital facility.

Consistent with Notice 2011-52, these proposed regulations provide that in order to make its CHNA report widely available to the public, a hospital facility must post the CHNA report on the hospital facility’s Web site or, if the hospital facility does not have its own Web site separate from the hospital organization that operates it, on the hospital organization’s Web site. Alternatively, the hospital facility may post the CHNA report on a Web site established and maintained by another entity as long as either the hospital facility or hospital organization’s Web site (if the facility or organization has a Web site) provides a link to the web page on which the CHNA report is posted, along with clear instructions for accessing the report on that Web site. In addition, the hospital facility must ensure that individuals with access to the Internet can access, download, view, and print a hard copy of the CHNA report without requiring special computer hardware or software (other than software that is readily available to members of the public without payment of any fee) and without payment of a fee to the hospital facility, hospital organization, or other entity maintaining the Web site. Finally, the hospital facility must provide individuals who ask how to access a copy of the CHNA report online with the direct Web site address, or URL, of the web page on which the document is posted.

Commenters generally supported the requirement outlined in Notice 2011-52 to make the CHNA report widely available on a Web site. Many of these commenters believed that this Web posting requirement alone was sufficient to make the CHNA report widely available to the public. Others, however, urged the Treasury Department and the IRS to expand the requirements for making a CHNA widely available to the public to require the hospital facility to provide paper copies of the CHNA report for free to any individual requesting it. Some commenters requested a requirement that the hospital facility identify strategies to inform various sectors of the community that the CHNA report is widely available on a Web site.

A few commenters also recommended expanding the requirements associated with making CHNA reports widely available on a Web site. Some commenters recommended requiring that the CHNA reports be conspicuously posted on the applicable Web site, for example by requiring a highly visible link on the Web site’s homepage. Another commenter recommended requiring past, as well as current, CHNA reports to be posted, to demonstrate improvement of health care objectives over the long term. Yet another commenter recommended requiring that individuals do not need to provide personally identifiable information or create an account to access the CHNA report.

Because of the focus on increased transparency of hospital facilities in section 501(r), the Treasury Department and the IRS have adopted most of the comments seeking to enhance transparency of a hospital facility’s CHNA by expanding the requirements to make the CHNA report widely available to the public. Specifically, these proposed regulations make four changes to the interim rule described in Notice 2011-52 for making the CHNA report widely available to the public. First, these proposed regulations require a complete version of the CHNA report to be “conspicuously” posted on a Web site, to ensure that the CHNA report can be easily located on the Web site. Second, instead of requiring the CHNA report to be posted on the Web site until the next CHNA report is posted, these proposed regulations require the CHNA report to remain on the Web site until two subsequent CHNA reports have been posted, so information on trends will be available to the public. Third, these proposed regulations add that an individual must not be required to create an account or otherwise be required to provide personally identifiable information in order to access the CHNA report on a Web site. Fourth, these proposed regulations add a requirement that a hospital facility must make a paper copy of its CHNA report available for public inspection without charge at the hospital facility at least until the date the hospital facility has made available for public inspection, without charge, a paper copy of its two subsequent CHNAs.

Because the requirement to make a document “widely available on a Web site” applies not only to a hospital facility’s CHNA reports but also, under the 2012 proposed regulations, to its financial assistance policy and related documents, the term “widely available on a Web site” is defined in the definitions section of these proposed regulations and will apply to both rules.

Finally, to facilitate the sharing of draft versions of the CHNA report for comment as requested by some commenters, these proposed regulations provide that a hospital facility will not be considered to have made the CHNA report widely available to the public for purposes of determining the date on which the hospital facility has conducted the CHNA if it makes widely available on a Web site (and/or for public inspection) a version of the CHNA report that is expressly marked as a draft on which the public may comment. Thus, a hospital facility may post a draft CHNA report for public review and comment without starting its next three-year CHNA cycle.

Notice 2011-52 noted the intention of the Treasury Department and the IRS to define an “implementation strategy” for a hospital facility as a written plan that addresses each of the health needs identified through a CHNA for the facility. Notice 2011-52 further provided that an implementation strategy would “address” a health need identified through a CHNA if the written plan either: (1) describes how the hospital facility plans to meet the health need, or (2) identifies the health need as one the hospital facility does not intend to meet and explains why the hospital facility does not intend to meet the health need.

A number of commenters asked that the implementation strategy be required to address only significant or priority health needs identified through the CHNA. Other commenters asked if the implementation strategy could address health needs identified from a source other than the hospital facility’s CHNA.

As indicated in section 3.a.ii of this preamble, these proposed regulations limit the health needs that a hospital facility must identify through its CHNA to significant health needs and the health needs covered in the implementation strategy are limited to those significant health needs identified through the CHNA. In addition, these proposed regulations do not require a hospital facility to develop a strategy or plan to address each identified significant health need. Rather, consistent with section 6033(b)(15)(A) of the Code, these proposed regulations follow the approach set forth in Notice 2011-52 and clarify that a hospital facility’s implementation strategy must, with respect to each significant health need identified through the CHNA, either: (1) describe how the hospital facility plans to address the health need; or (2) identify the health need as one the hospital facility does not intend to address and explain why the hospital facility does not intend to address the health need. Accordingly, an implementation strategy may describe how the hospital facility plans to address only a few of the significant health needs identified through a CHNA, as long as it explains why it does not intend to address the other identified significant health needs for which no plan is provided.

Although an implementation strategy must address the significant health needs identified through a hospital facility’s CHNA, these proposed regulations do not limit an implementation strategy to addressing only those health needs, and it may describe activities to address health needs that the hospital facility identifies in other ways.

Commenters recommended that the implementation strategy be required to describe its intended impact on health outcomes. Some of these commenters recommended that the descriptions of intended impacts include short- and long-term measurable goals and objectives, as well as methods to evaluate the plan’s effectiveness. One commenter stated that an implementation strategy should assign an economic value to each strategy or activity, and an aggregate total benefit. Others recommended requiring the implementation strategy to include a mechanism to receive ongoing community feedback.

In describing how a hospital facility plans to address a significant health need identified through the CHNA, these proposed regulations adopt some of the commenters’ recommendations by requiring the implementation strategy to describe, in addition to the actions the hospital facility intends to take to address the health need, the anticipated impact of these actions and the plan to evaluate such impact. For example, a hospital facility’s CHNA may identify as significant health needs financial or other barriers to care in the community, such as high rates of financial need or large numbers of uninsured individuals and families. Its implementation strategy could describe a program to decrease the impact of these barriers, such as by expanding its financial assistance program or helping uninsured individuals and families learn about and enroll in sources of insurance such as Medicare, Medicaid, Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and the new Health Insurance Marketplaces (also known as the Exchanges); state how it anticipates its program will reduce these barriers to care; and identify the data sources it will use to track the program’s impact on the barriers.

These proposed regulations also require the implementation strategy to identify the programs and resources the hospital facility plans to commit to address the health need. Finally, the implementation strategy must describe any planned collaboration between the hospital facility and other facilities or organizations in addressing the health need.

While these proposed regulations do not require the implementation strategy itself to include any particular mechanism for community input, they do provide that a hospital facility must establish an ongoing feedback mechanism by requiring a hospital facility, in conducting a CHNA, to take into account written comments received on its most recently adopted implementation strategy, as described in section 3.a.iii.C of this preamble.

Several commenters sought clarification regarding the level of detail required in the implementation strategy’s explanation of why the hospital facility does not intend to address a significant health need. Some of these commenters stated that an explanation of the prioritization strategy together with comments noting that another facility or organization is addressing the health need should be sufficient.

These proposed regulations clarify that a brief explanation of why a hospital facility does not intend to address the significant health need is sufficient. Some possible examples of reasons a hospital facility might offer for not addressing a health need, include, but are not limited to, resource constraints, relative lack of expertise or competency to effectively address the need, a relatively low priority assigned to the need, a lack of identified effective interventions to address the need, and/or the fact that the need is being addressed by other facilities or organizations in the community. This list of possible reasons is not intended to be exhaustive, and a hospital facility may provide whatever reasons reflect its particular facts and circumstances.

Notice 2011-52 noted that the Treasury Department and the IRS intended to allow hospital facilities to collaborate with other facilities and organizations in developing an implementation strategy but to still require each hospital facility to separately document its implementation strategy. Some commenters requested that hospital facilities conducting a joint CHNA should be permitted to adopt a joint implementation strategy while other commenters recommended retaining the requirement for separate implementation strategies, with each side advancing arguments similar to those advanced for and against joint CHNA reports.

In balancing these concerns, these proposed regulations state that a hospital facility may develop an implementation strategy in collaboration with other facilities and organizations. In addition, these proposed regulations provide that a hospital facility that collaborates with other facilities or organizations in developing its implementation strategy generally must document its implementation strategy in a separate written plan that is tailored to the hospital facility and takes into account its specific programs and resources.

However, these proposed regulations also provide an exception to the general requirement of separate implementation strategies: namely, a hospital facility collaborating with other hospital facilities may adopt a joint implementation strategy as long as it documents its CHNA in a joint CHNA report (as described in section 3.a.v of this preamble) and the joint implementation strategy meets three requirements. First, the joint implementation strategy must be clearly identified as applying to the hospital facility. Second, the joint implementation strategy must clearly identify the hospital facility’s particular role and responsibilities in taking the actions described in the implementation strategy and the programs and resources the hospital facility plans to commit in taking those actions. Third, the joint implementation strategy must include a summary or other tool that helps the reader easily locate those portions of the joint implementation strategy that relate to the hospital facility.

In order to satisfy the CHNA requirements with respect to any taxable year, section 501(r)(3)(A)(ii) requires a hospital facility to adopt an implementation strategy to meet the health needs identified through the CHNA described in section 501(r)(3)(A)(i). Consistent with this statutory language, Notice 2011-52 stated the intention of the Treasury Department and the IRS to require a hospital facility to adopt an implementation strategy to meet the health needs identified through a CHNA by the end of the same taxable year in which it conducts that CHNA. A number of commenters sought additional time to complete the implementation strategy, in part to accommodate collaborating hospital facilities with different taxable years. Most of these commenters recommended that the implementation strategy should be adopted within 12 months after completion of the CHNA or by the end of the next taxable year, rather than by the end of the same taxable year in which the CHNA is completed.

Because a hospital facility only has to conduct a CHNA once every three years and may begin the CHNA process at any time during the three-year period, a hospital facility should have ample time to complete the CHNA earlier in the third taxable year and adopt an implementation strategy by the end of that same taxable year. The flexibility afforded by a three-year cycle should also allow hospital facilities with different tax years sufficient time to collaborate. Thus, consistent with Notice 2011-52, these proposed regulations provide that an authorized body of the hospital facility must adopt the implementation strategy by the end of the same taxable year in which the hospital facility finishes conducting the CHNA (typically, by making the CHNA report widely available to the public). These proposed regulations also clarify that if a hospital facility begins working on a CHNA in one taxable year but completes the final required step for the CHNA (and hence is considered to have conducted it) in the subsequent taxable year, it is not required to adopt the implementation strategy until the taxable year in which the CHNA process is considered conducted, not the year it began. The Treasury Department and the IRS seek comments on whether this rule will materially inhibit the ability of hospital facilities with different taxable years to collaborate with each other or otherwise burden hospital facilities unnecessarily.

Notwithstanding the general rule that the implementation strategy must be adopted in the same taxable year the CHNA is considered conducted, these proposed regulations provide transition relief for the adoption of a hospital facility’s implementation strategy for its first CHNA conducted after the effective date of section 501(r)(3), in recognition of the fact that certain hospital facilities may not have a full three years in which to conduct their first CHNA. This transition relief is described in section 3.d of this preamble.

Notice 2011-52 requested comments regarding when a hospital facility that is newly acquired or placed into service must conduct a CHNA. Comments received on this issue ranged from requiring such a hospital facility to conduct a CHNA within the first taxable year of acquisition or licensing to allowing the facility three taxable years following the date of acquisition or licensing. In addition, at least two commenters asked for clarification on when a for-profit hospital that converts to section 501(c)(3) status must conduct a CHNA. Additional commenters asked if a short taxable year resulting from, for example, a change in ownership, is considered a “taxable year” for purposes of the three-year CHNA cycle.

These proposed regulations provide that a hospital facility that is newly acquired or placed into service by a hospital organization, or that becomes newly subject to section 501(r) because the hospital organization that operates it is newly recognized as described in section 501(c)(3), must conduct a CHNA and adopt an implementation strategy to meet the community health needs identified through that CHNA by the last day of the second taxable year beginning after the date, respectively, the hospital facility is acquired or placed into service, or newly subject to section 501(r).

A short taxable year of less than twelve months is considered a taxable year for purposes of section 501(r). Thus, the taxable year in which a hospital facility is acquired or placed into service, or becomes subject to section 501(r), is a taxable year for purposes of the CHNA requirements, regardless of whether that taxable year is less than twelve months. As a result, a deadline of the last day of the second taxable year beginning after the date of acquisition, licensure, or section 501(c)(3) recognition provides these new hospital facilities with three taxable years (even if less than three full calendar years) to meet the section 501(r)(3) requirements.

A number of commenters requested various forms of transition relief, noting the complexity of the new CHNA requirements. In particular, a few commenters asked if a CHNA conducted before the effective date of the CHNA requirements could satisfy the CHNA requirements for a taxable year beginning after the effective date (that is, for a taxable year beginning after March 23, 2012). In addition, several commenters specifically requested transition relief with respect to the first implementation strategy adopted after the effective date of the CHNA requirements. The suggestions for transition relief for the adoption of the first implementation strategy ranged from 30 to 60 days after the end of the taxable year in which the CHNA was conducted to the end of the taxable year following the taxable year in which the CHNA was conducted. In response to these comments, these proposed regulations provide transition relief that is tailored to the taxable year after March 23, 2010, in which a hospital facility conducts its first CHNA.

These proposed regulations provide that a hospital facility that conducted a CHNA described in section 501(r)(3) in either of its first two taxable years beginning after March 23, 2010, does not need to meet the requirements of section 501(r)(3) again until the third taxable year following the taxable year in which the hospital facility conducted the CHNA. To qualify for this transition relief, the hospital facility must adopt an implementation strategy to meet the community health needs identified through the CHNA conducted in its first taxable year beginning after March 23, 2010 or 2011 on or before the 15th day of the fifth calendar month following the close of its first taxable year beginning after March 23, 2012. Thus, for example, if a hospital facility reporting on a calendar-year basis conducts a CHNA in 2012 and adopts an implementation strategy for that CHNA on or before May 15, 2014, it does not need to meet the section 501(r)(3) requirements again until 2015.

If a hospital facility conducts a CHNA described in section 501(r)(3) in its first taxable year beginning after March 23, 2012, these proposed regulations provide that the hospital facility will be deemed to satisfy the requirement to adopt an implementation strategy in the same taxable year the CHNA is conducted if an authorized body of the hospital facility adopts an implementation strategy to meet the community health needs identified through that CHNA on or before the 15th day of the fifth calendar month following the close of its first taxable year beginning after March 23, 2012.

Notice 2011-52 stated the intention of the Treasury Department and the IRS to require a hospital organization to attach to its annual information return (Form 990) the most recently adopted implementation strategy for each of the hospital facilities it operates. A few commenters stated that, rather than require the entire implementation strategy to be attached to the Form 990, the Treasury Department and the IRS should permit a narrative summary description of the contents of its implementation strategy to be provided on the Form 990. One of these commenters noted that the implementation strategy is only required to be updated every three years, so in many instances a narrative may provide more relevant and timely information. A number of other commenters recommended requiring the implementation strategy to be made widely available to the public, rather than merely attached to the Form 990, in order to encourage greater transparency and provide an opportunity for public input and comment.

These proposed regulations allow a hospital organization either to attach to its Form 990 a copy of the most recently adopted implementation strategy for each hospital facility it operates or to provide on the Form 990 the URL(s) of the web page(s) on which it has made each implementation strategy widely available on a Web site. An implementation strategy must describe, with respect to each significant health need identified through the CHNA, how the hospital facility plans to address the health need or why the hospital facility does not intend to address the health need. Similarly, section 6033(b)(15)(A) requires a hospital organization to furnish annually information setting forth a “description of how the organization is addressing the needs identified in each” CHNA and “a description of any such needs that are not being addressed together with the reasons why such needs are not being addressed.” Thus, the requirement in these proposed regulations to attach the implementation strategy to the Form 990, or provide on the Form 990 the URL where the implementation strategy is made widely available on a Web site, partially implements section 6033(b)(15)(A).

However, the requirement in section 6033(b)(15)(A) also encompasses an annual, up-to-date description of the actions actually taken by a hospital facility during the taxable year to address the significant health needs identified through the most recently conducted CHNA (which, presumably, will typically be steps taken during a taxable year to execute the hospital facility’s most recently adopted implementation strategy). Accordingly, these proposed regulations require a hospital organization to provide annually on the Form 990 a description of the actions taken during the taxable year to address the significant health needs identified through its most recent CHNA for each hospital facility it operates or, if no actions were taken with respect to one or more of these health needs, the reason or reasons why no actions were taken.

These proposed regulations also reiterate the requirement of section 6033(b)(15)(B) that a hospital organization attach to its Form 990 a copy of its audited financial statements for the taxable year — or in the case of an organization the financial statements of which are included in consolidated financial statements with other organizations, such consolidated financial statements. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments regarding whether hospital organizations whose financial statements are included in consolidated financial statements should be able to redact financial information about any taxable organizations that are members of the consolidated group.

Finally, consistent with section 6033(b)(10), these proposed regulations require a hospital organization to disclose the amount of the excise tax imposed on the organization under section 4959 during the taxable year for failures to meet the requirements of section 501(r)(3).

A few commenters requested clarification regarding whether government hospitals will continue to be excepted from these and other Form 990 reporting requirements under Rev. Proc. 95-48, 1995-2 C.B. 418. In Rev. Proc. 95-48, the IRS exercised its discretionary authority under section 6033(a)(3)(B) to relieve certain governmental units and affiliates of governmental units from the requirement to file a Form 990. The Affordable Care Act did not change the requirements regarding which organizations are required to file a Form 990. Accordingly, a government hospital (other than one that is described in section 509(a)(3)) that has been excused from filing a Form 990 under Rev. Proc. 95-48 or a successor revenue procedure is not required to file a Form 990. Because government hospitals described in Rev. Proc. 95-48 (other than those described in section 509(a)(3)) are relieved from the annual filing requirements under section 6033, they are also relieved from any new reporting requirements imposed on hospital organizations by these proposed regulations under section 6033, including under sections 6033(b)(10)(D) and (b)(15) and the proposed requirement to attach one or more implementation strategies to a Form 990.

Section 4959 imposes a $50,000 excise tax on a hospital organization that fails to meet the CHNA requirements of section 501(r)(3) with respect to any taxable year.

Notice 2011-52 indicated the intent of the Treasury Department and the IRS to impose the $50,000 tax with respect to a failure by a hospital facility to satisfy section 501(r)(3) in any three-year period, making it possible for the excise tax to apply in sequential years. Notice 2011-52 provided an example of a hospital organization that reports on a calendar-year basis and operates only one hospital facility, which is subject to the $50,000 excise tax in 2013 because the hospital facility failed to conduct a CHNA in 2011, 2012, and 2013. If the hospital facility again fails to conduct a CHNA by the last day of 2014, Notice 2011-52 noted the hospital organization will again be subject to the $50,000 excise tax in 2014 for the hospital facility’s failure to conduct a CHNA in 2012, 2013, and 2014. These proposed regulations include this example of the application of the section 4959 excise tax and confirm that the excise tax may be imposed for each taxable year that a hospital facility fails to meet the section 501(r)(3) requirements. These proposed regulations also make clear that the excise tax may be imposed in addition to any tax imposed on a noncompliant hospital facility as described in section 2.d of this preamble or that results from revocation of a hospital organization’s section 501(c)(3) status.

In addition, Notice 2011-52 stated the intention of the Treasury Department and the IRS to apply the section 4959 excise tax separately with respect to each hospital facility’s failure to meet the CHNA requirements. Thus, if a hospital organization that operates two hospital facilities fails to meet the requirements of section 501(r)(3) with respect to both facilities in any taxable year, the hospital organization will be subject to a total excise tax of $100,000 ($50,000 for each hospital facility) for that taxable year.

At least one commenter argued that applying the $50,000 excise tax on a facility-by-facility basis is inconsistent with the statutory language in section 4959 that “there is imposed on the organization a tax equal to $50,000.” On the other hand, two commenters explicitly supported applying the section 4959 excise tax at the hospital facility level. One of these commenters expressed concern that if the $50,000 excise tax were imposed on a hospital organization without regard to the number of hospital facilities it operates that have failed the section 501(r)(3) requirements, a hospital organization operating multiple facilities may choose to pay the tax rather than conduct a CHNA and adopt an implementation strategy for every facility it operates.

The Treasury Department and the IRS note that section 501(r)(2)(B)(i) requires a hospital organization operating more than one hospital facility to meet the CHNA requirements “separately with respect to each such facility” and section 501(r)(2)(B)(ii) suggests that one hospital organization can fail to meet the CHNA requirements separately with respect to each hospital facility. Thus, a hospital organization with multiple hospital facilities can “fail[] to meet the requirements of section 501(r)(3)” within the meaning of section 4959 separately with respect to each hospital facility. Accordingly, these proposed regulations adopt the approach in Notice 2011-52 of applying the excise tax on a facility-by-facility basis.

One commenter requested clarification that the excise tax will be imposed on any hospital organization that fails to satisfy any requirement under section 501(r)(3), including the requirement to adopt an implementation strategy, and is not limited to a failure related to conducting the CHNA. These proposed regulations, in adopting the approach taken in Notice 2011-52, clarify that the excise tax is imposed on a failure to meet any of the requirements under section 501(r)(3), including the requirement to adopt an implementation strategy described in section 501(r)(3)(A)(ii).

The 2012 proposed regulations under section 501(r)(4) through (r)(6) were proposed to apply for taxable years beginning on or after the date those rules are published in the Federal Register as final or temporary regulations. By contrast, these proposed regulations provide that both these proposed regulations and the 2012 proposed regulations will generally be effective on the date these rules are published in the Federal Register as final or temporary regulations. Providing for an immediate effective date gives immediate effect to the transition relief described in §1.501(r)-3(e) and will also allow the Treasury Department and the IRS to consider transition relief for the requirements under §1.501(r)-4 through §1.501(r)-6 of the 2012 proposed regulations based on the estimated amount of time to come into compliance with those rules rather than a particular hospital organization’s taxable year. The proposed regulations under sections 6033(b)(10) and (b)(15)(A) are proposed to be effective for returns filed on or after the date these rules are published in the Federal Register as final or temporary regulations.

A hospital facility may rely on §1.501(r)-3 of these proposed regulations for any CHNA conducted or implementation strategy adopted on or before the date that is six months after the date these proposed regulations are published as final or temporary regulations in the Federal Register. As provided in Notice 2011-52, hospital organizations may continue to rely on the interim rules described in Notice 2011-52 for any CHNA conducted or implementation strategy adopted on or before October 5, 2013, which is the date that is six months after these proposed regulations are published. After October 5, 2013, Notice 2011-52 is obsolete. The Treasury Department and the IRS invite comments on whether, and what type of, additional transitional relief may be necessary.

Hospital organizations should note that the statutory effective date of section 501(r)(3) is a hospital organization’s first taxable year beginning after March 23, 2012. The effective date for the other requirements under section 501(r) is a hospital organization’s first taxable year beginning after March 23, 2010.

IRS notices, revenue rulings, and revenue procedures cited in this preamble are made available by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.

It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It also has been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to this proposed regulation. It is hereby certified that the collection of information in these regulations will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The collection of information is in §1.501(r)-3 and §1.6033-2(a)(2)(ii)(l) of the regulations. This certification is based on the following:

Consistent with the requirements imposed by statute, §1.501(r)-3 of the regulations requires hospital facilities to conduct a CHNA and adopt an implementation strategy. However, these requirements need only be satisfied once over a period of three taxable years. Moreover, some hospital facilities already conduct similar community needs assessments under state law, and the Treasury Department and the IRS expect that these facilities will be able to draw upon pre-existing processes and resources to some extent.

Consistent with the requirements imposed by statute, §1.6033-2(a)(2)(ii)(l) of the regulations requires affected organizations to report annually on a Form 990 actions taken during the year to address community health needs and to attach audited financial statements to the Form 990. To assist the IRS and the public, the regulations also require affected organizations to attach to the Form 990 a copy of the most recently adopted implementation strategy or provide the URL of a web page where it is available to the public. For affected organizations, the burden of providing either a copy of the implementation strategy or the address of a Web site where it can be found will be minimal. Consequently, the regulations do not add to the impact on small entities imposed by the statutory scheme.

For these reasons, the collection of information in this regulation that is subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act will not impose a significant economic burden upon the affected organizations. Accordingly, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) is not required. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, this regulation has been submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small entities.

Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations, consideration will be given to any comments that are submitted timely to the IRS as prescribed in this preamble under “Addresses.” The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on all aspects of the proposed rules. All comments will be available at www.regulations.gov or upon request.

A public hearing will be scheduled if requested in writing by any person that timely submits written comments. If a public hearing is scheduled, notice of the date, time, and place for the public hearing will be published in the Federal Register.

Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in part as follows:

Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *

Par. 2. Section 1.501(r)-0 as proposed to be amended at 77 FR 38160 (June 26, 2012) is proposed to be further amended as follows:

1. Adding a new entry to §1.501(r)-1, paragraph (c).

2. Adding new entries to §1.501(r)-2 and §1.501(r)-3.

3. Revising the entry to §1.501(r)-7.

The revision and additions to read as follows:

Par. 9. The authority citation for part 53 continues to read in part as follows:

Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *

Par. 10. Section 53.4959-1 is added to read as follows: