This IRM provides assistance to employees who may identify and report emerging issues. It also serves to promote effective communication and coordination, consistent treatment, and efficient processing of reported issues.

IRM 1.1.16.3.5.5, Exam Quality and Technical Support, states that the mission of Exam Quality and Technical Support is to implement strategies to prevent offshore tax noncompliance, address emerging issues, provide technical guidance, lead implementation of new legislation affecting SB/SE Examination and support Field, Campus, and Specialty Exam quality. To accomplish the mission, the Director, Exam Quality and Technical Support is authorized to develop and deliver mission-oriented strategies, identify and address emerging issues, and other potential areas of noncompliance.

The Technical Legislation Implementation group oversees implementation of new legislation, including the associated compliance plans, maintains the knowledge management portal to provide additional technical support and guidance to Exam employees, and manages the emerging issues identification and assessment process. To accomplish the mission, the Program Manager of the Technical Legislation Implementation group leads in identifying and analyzing emerging issues with support from the Technical Support Group (EQ&TS) and the Lead Development Center in the Office of Promoter Investigations, and submits recommendations on transactions deemed to be of priority concern for the SB/SE Operating Division. The Program Manager of the Technical Legislation Implementation group reports to the Director, Exam Quality and Technical Support.

The Director, Headquarters Examination, is the executive responsible for providing policy and guidance for field employees and ensuring consistent application of policy, procedures, and tax law to effect tax administration while protecting taxpayer’s rights. See IRM 1.1.16.3.5, Headquarters Examination, for additional information.

The Director, Exam Quality and Technical Support, reports to the Director, Headquarters Examination, and is responsible for delivery of policy and guidance that impacts the field examination processes.

The Program Manager of the Technical Legislation Implementation Group reports to the Director, Exam Quality and Technical Support and is responsible for the SB/SE Emerging Issue program.

All examiners and their managers who may identify and report emerging issues are responsible for familiarizing themselves with the information contained in this IRM.

Program Reports: A quarterly Executive Governance Panel briefing report and a monthly Emerging Issue Process Team submission tracking report are produced and distributed to the respective Panel and Process Team members. Ad hoc reports are produced as requested by the Emerging Issues Process Team or Executive Governance Panel. The information for the reports is obtained from the issue submission data in a database where the information is also stored. The primary purpose of the data is to track the status of and make decisions related to submitted issues. The data is also used to identify and monitor trends.

Program Effectiveness: The Emerging Issue Process is new and how to measure effectiveness is still being evaluated. Effectiveness will potentially be measured by the number of submissions to the process, trend analysis, and monitoring the results of compliance strategies and risk mitigations.

The Emerging Issue Process uses SharePoint sites to track emerging issue submissions. Access to these sites are restricted by permission level on the site and limited to select members of the Emerging Issue Process team.

The following table lists acronyms used throughout this IRM and their definitions:

The following table lists abbreviations used throughout this IRM and their associated phrases:

For additional information see:

For TE/GE Emerging Issues: The Compliance Planning and Classification (CP&C) function within TE/GE receives all emerging issues. The issues go through a vetting process. If the emerging issue warrants further analysis it is developed by the Issue ID function. Additional information can be found on the TE/GE CP&C Website.

Emerging issue submissions are numbered and tracked. The Emerging Issue SPA:

The Emerging Issue SPA confers with the submitter, LDC, ECS/FCS, and other stakeholders to obtain additional information on issues as needed to perfect the submission, provide coordination, and to eliminate any duplication of effort.

Upon completion of the preliminary evaluation, the Emerging Issue SPA advances the emerging issue to Phase 2: Risking Assessment and Approval.

The Emerging Issue SPA presents the issue to the Team. The Team gathers issue information and research as needed for additional issue assessment and a compliance risk determination. The Team also collaborates with SB/SE stakeholders, such as the submitter; Subject Matter Expert (SME); Issue Champion; Counsel; the LDC; and ECS, and other BODs/FODs if also affected by the issue.

The Team assesses the issue’s compliance risk as high, medium, or low risk level utilizing data analysis and risk assessment tools. The Team also identifies potential compliance activities.

The purpose of using risk assessment tools is to determine an emerging issue’s strategic importance and compliance impact in a consistent manner. These tools should be used with other relevant information and factors to allocate compliance resources to target emerging risk areas. By utilizing these tools, each issue will be designated as being a high priority issue or a medium/low priority issue defined as follows:

If the assessment identifies an issue as medium or low risk, the Team advances the issue to Phase 3A to consider recommendation of risk mitigations for medium and low risk issues.

If the assessment identifies an issue as high risk, the Team recommends the development of a compliance strategy to the Panel. The Team prepares a summary briefing to request approval of the high risk prioritization and development of a compliance strategy (Executive Decision Point One in the Emerging Issue Process). If approved, the Team advances the issue to Phase 3B.

If the Panel does not approve the high risk prioritization and development of a compliance strategy, the Team advances the issue to Phase 3A to consider recommendation of risk mitigations for medium and low risk issues.

This phase is divided into 3A: Submission Development - Medium and Low Risk Issues, and 3B: Submission Development - High Risk Issues, due to the differences in the process for each issue category.

For both 3A and 3B, the Team collaborates with stakeholders including, but not limited to, affected field personnel; Counsel; and issue specialists, as needed throughout the duration of the process to consider risk mitigations as appropriate. Affected ad hoc Team members will be included as indicated in the Charter for cross-BOD/FOD collaboration.

The Team’s data and preliminary recommendation on a compliance strategy are shared with affected stakeholders, which may include examiners, managers, and Counsel from all affected BODs/FODs to get input.

The Team develops a compliance strategy and exit strategy recommendation, determines resources needed, and recommends roles and responsibilities for implementation and exit.

The Team prepares and delivers a briefing on recommendations to the Panel, which may include the following compliance strategies:

If the Panel approves the compliance strategy and implementation (Executive Decision Point Two), the Team advances the high risk issue to Phase 5.

If the Panel does not approve the compliance strategy and implementation, the Team will address any feedback from the Panel and consider gathering additional information to support the strategy or an alterative strategy for the issue. Alternatively, the issue may be downgraded to medium or low risk and routed to Phase 3A.

The Team implements the approved compliance strategy for high risk issues or the risk mitigations on medium and low risk issues.

The Team monitors the compliance strategy or risk mitigations’ results and modifies the process as needed with input from stakeholders.

The Team evaluates the overall compliance strategy or risk mitigations implementation to determine if the emerged issue is ready for closure/exit.

For medium and low risk issues, the Team determines and implements an exit strategy. Once the exit strategy is complete, the Emerging Issue SPA closes the issue on the tracking database.

For high risk issues, the Team prepares an executive briefing to the Panel to recommend an exit strategy along with a recommendation for continued compliance support.

If the Panel approves the implementation of the exit strategy (Executive Decision Point Three), the Emerging Issue SPA closes the issue on the tracking database.

If the Panel does not approve the implementation of the exit strategy, the Team revises the exit strategy or continues monitoring the compliance strategy results. The Team continues to reevaluate the overall compliance strategy implementation to determine when the emerging issue is ready for closure/exit.