Highlights of This Issue INCOME TAX ADMINISTRATIVE Preface The IRS Mission Introduction Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous Notice 201431 Notice 201432 Rev. Proc. 201430 Rev. Proc. 201431 Part IV. Items of General Interest Announcement 201420 Announcement 201421 Definition of Terms and Abbreviations Definition of Terms Abbreviations Numerical Finding List Numerical Finding List Effect of Current Actions on Previously Published Items Finding List of Current Actions on Previously Published Items INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETIN CUMULATIVE BULLETINS INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETINS ON CD-ROM We Welcome Comments About the Internal Revenue Bulletin Internal Revenue Bulletin: 2014-20 May 12, 2014 Highlights of This Issue These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be relied upon as authoritative interpretations. INCOME TAX Announcement 2014–20 Announcement 2014–20 The Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) announces recent disciplinary sanctions involving attorneys, certified public accountants, enrolled agents, enrolled actuaries, enrolled retirement plan agents, and appraisers. These individuals are subject to the regulations governing practice before the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), which are set out in Title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 10, and which are published in pamphlet form as Treasury Department Circular No. 230. The regulations prescribe the duties and restrictions relating to such practice and prescribe the disciplinary sanctions for violating the regulations. Announcement 2014–21 Announcement 2014–21 This announcement contains corrections to the final and temporary regulations (TD 9658) that were published in the Federal Register on March 6, 2014 (79 FR 12726). The instruction in the temporary regulations to amend § 1.6045–1T is incorrect. Instead, § 1.6045–1T is added. Rev. Proc. 2014–30 Rev. Proc. 2014–30 This revenue procedure provides the 2015 inflation adjusted amounts for Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) under section 223 of the Internal Revenue Code. Notice 2014–31 Notice 2014–31 This notice extends the guidance provided in Notice 2012–45 regarding the treatment of income from certain government bonds held by certain active banks for purposes of determining whether a foreign corporation is a passive foreign investment company (PFIC) to taxable years of foreign corporations beginning in 2014, 2015, and 2016. Rev. Proc. 2014–31 Rev. Proc. 2014–31 This procedure provides issuers of qualified mortgage bonds (QMBs) and qualified mortgage credit certificates (MCCs) with average area purchase price safe harbors for statistical areas in the United States and with a nationwide average purchase price for residences in the United States for purposes of the QMB rules under section 143 of the Code and the MCC rules under section 25. Rev. Proc. 2013–28 is obsolete except as provided in section 6 of this revenue procedure. Notice 2014–32 Notice 2014–32 This notice announces modifications to the regulations under section 367(b) of the Internal Revenue Code relating to the treatment of property used to acquire parent stock or securities in certain triangular reorganizations involving foreign corporations. ADMINISTRATIVE Rev. Proc. 2014–31 Rev. Proc. 2014–31 This procedure provides issuers of qualified mortgage bonds (QMBs) and qualified mortgage credit certificates (MCCs) with average area purchase price safe harbors for statistical areas in the United States and with a nationwide average purchase price for residences in the United States for purposes of the QMB rules under section 143 of the Code and the MCC rules under section 25. Rev. Proc. 2013–28 is obsolete except as provided in section 6 of this revenue procedure. Preface The IRS Mission Provide America’s taxpayers top-quality service by helping them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and enforce the law with integrity and fairness to all. Introduction The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service and for publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax Conventions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of general interest. It is published weekly. It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all substantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke, modify, or amend any of those previously published in the Bulletin. All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indicated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal management are not published; however, statements of internal practices and procedures that affect the rights and duties of taxpayers are published. Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service on the application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in the revenue ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers or technical advice to Service field offices, identifying details and information of a confidential nature are deleted to prevent unwarranted invasions of privacy and to comply with statutory requirements. Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations, court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered, and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless the facts and circumstances are substantially the same. The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows: Part I.—1986 Code. This part includes rulings and decisions based on provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation. This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A, Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B, Legislation and Related Committee Reports. Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous. To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued by the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Assistant Secretary (Enforcement). Part IV.—Items of General Interest. This part includes notices of proposed rulemakings, disbarment and suspension lists, and announcements. The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index for the matters published during the preceding months. These monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period. Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous Notice 2014–31 Extension of Notice 2012–45 Treatment of Income from Certain Government Bonds for Purposes of the Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules SECTION 1. PURPOSE This notice extends the application of Notice 2012–45, 2012–29 I.R.B. 59 (July 1, 2012), which provides guidance regarding the treatment of certain government bonds for purposes of determining whether a foreign corporation is a passive foreign investment company (PFIC) under section 1297 of the Code, to taxable years of foreign corporations beginning in 2014, 2015, and 2016. SECTION 2. BACKGROUND Recent economic conditions have resulted in a shift in the assets held by some non-U.S. financial institutions. As a result of these conditions, certain non-U.S. financial institutions continue to hold government bonds at higher than historical levels. These increased levels raise an issue concerning the treatment of these financial institutions, and specifically the treatment of government bonds, under the PFIC rules. SECTION 3. NOTICE 2012–45 The Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service published Notice 2012–45, which provides that for certain taxable years and solely for purposes of section 1297, income from “Qualifying Government Bonds” held by an “Active Bank” qualifies for the active banking exception, as those terms are defined in the notice. Notice 2012–45 applies only to taxable years of foreign corporations beginning in 2011, 2012, and 2013. SECTION 4. EXTENSION OF NOTICE 2012–45 Notice 2012–45 is extended to apply to taxable years of foreign corporations beginning in 2014, 2015, and 2016 in addition to taxable years of foreign corporations beginning in 2011, 2012, and 2013. SECTION 5. DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal author of this notice is Melinda E. Harvey of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International). For further information regarding this notice contact Melinda E. Harvey at (202) 317-6934 (not a toll-free number). Notice 2014–32 Treatment of Property Used To Acquire Parent Stock or Securities in Certain Triangular Reorganizations Involving Foreign Corporations SECTION 1. OVERVIEW This notice announces that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Department of the Treasury (Treasury Department) will issue regulations under section 367 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) relating to the treatment of property used to acquire parent stock or securities in certain triangular reorganizations involving one or more foreign corporations. SECTION 2. BACKGROUND .01 Issuance of Regulations On May 27, 2008, the IRS and the Treasury Department published temporary and proposed regulations (T.D. 9400, 2008–1 C.B. 1139 [73 FR 30301]) (2008 regulations) under section 367 that applied to certain triangular reorganizations in which a subsidiary (S) acquires stock of its parent corporation (P) in exchange for property (the P acquisition), and S exchanges the P stock so acquired for stock or property of a target corporation (T), but only if P or S (or both) is a foreign corporation. On May 19, 2011, the IRS and the Treasury Department finalized the proposed 2008 regulations (T.D. 9526, 2011–24 I.R.B. 869 [76 FR 28890]), with certain modifications (final regulations). .02 Deemed Distribution and Contribution Rules In the case of a triangular reorganization subject to § 1.367(b)–10, the final regulations require that adjustments be made that are consistent with the adjustments that would have been made if S had in fact distributed property to P under section 301 (deemed distribution). § 1.367(b)–10(b)(1). For this purpose, the amount of the deemed distribution generally is the amount of property that was transferred by S to acquire the P stock and securities in the P acquisition. In addition, the final regulations require that adjustments be made that are consistent with the adjustments that would have been made if P had in fact contributed that same property to S (deemed contribution). § 1.367(b)–10(b)(2). The deemed contribution has the effect of increasing P’s basis in its S stock by the amount of the deemed distribution. § 1.367(b)–10(c)(2). For purposes of making the required adjustments, the deemed distribution and deemed contribution are treated as separate transactions that occur before the P acquisition or, if P does not control S at the time of the P acquisition, immediately after P acquires control of S, but before the triangular reorganization. § 1.367(b)–10(b)(3). Furthermore, the final regulations provide that P’s adjustment to the basis in its S stock under § 1.358–6 is determined consistent with treating S as having acquired the P stock or securities in exchange for property from P or a person other than P, as the case may be. § 1.367(b)–10(b)(4). .03 Triangular Reorganizations Exempt from Final Regulations Under § 1.367(b)–10(a)(2), the final regulations do not apply to a triangular reorganization if: (i) P and S are foreign corporations and neither P nor S is a controlled foreign corporation (within the meaning of § 1.367(b)–2(a)) immediately before or immediately after the triangular reorganization; (ii) S is a domestic corporation, P’s stock in S is not a United States real property interest (within the meaning of section 897(c)), and P would not be subject to U.S. tax on a dividend from S under either section 881 (for example, by reason of an applicable treaty) or section 882 (no-U.S.-tax exception); or (iii) In an exchange under section 354 or 356, one or more U.S. persons exchange stock or securities of T and the amount of gain in the T stock or securities recognized by such U.S. persons under section 367(a)(1) is equal to or greater than the sum of the amount of the deemed distribution that would be treated by P as a dividend under section 301(c)(1) and the amount of such deemed distribution that would be treated by P as gain from the sale or exchange of property under section 301(c)(3) (together, section 367(b) income) if § 1.367(b)–10 would otherwise apply to the triangular reorganization (section 367(a) priority rule). As the corollary to the section 367(a) priority rule, the final regulations under section 367(a) also provide a priority rule in § 1.367(a)–3(a)(2)(iv) (section 367(b) priority rule). The section 367(b) priority rule turns off the application of section 367(a)(1) to an exchange under section 354 or 356 that occurs in connection with a triangular reorganization described in § 1.367(b)–10 if the amount of gain that would otherwise be recognized under section 367(a)(1) (without regard to any exceptions thereto) is less than the amount of the section 367(b) income recognized under § 1.367(b)–10. .04 Anti-Abuse Rule The final regulations provide that appropriate adjustments shall be made if, in connection with a triangular reorganization, a transaction is engaged in with a view to avoid the purpose of § 1.367(b)–10 (anti-abuse rule). § 1.367(b)–10(d). One example is given where the earnings and profits of S will be deemed to include the earnings and profits of a corporation related to P or S for purposes of determining the consequences of the adjustments provided in the final regulations, if S is created, organized, or funded to avoid the application of this section with respect to the earnings and profits of that related corporation. SECTION 3. TRANSACTIONS AT ISSUE The IRS and the Treasury Department are aware that taxpayers are engaging in transactions designed to avoid U.S. tax by exploiting the deemed contribution provided under the final regulations. The IRS and the Treasury Department believe that the deemed contribution is inconsistent with the purpose of § 1.367(b)–10, regardless of whether S acquires P stock or securities from P or from a person other than P. The IRS and the Treasury Department also are aware that the priority rules may facilitate certain transactions designed to avoid recognizing gain under § 1.367(a)–3(c). For example, FP, a foreign corporation, intends to acquire all the stock of UST, a domestic corporation owned by U.S. persons, in exchange for FP stock in a reorganization described in section 368(a)(1)(B). FP forms USS, a domestic corporation. USS generates a small amount of earnings and profits. USS acquires FP stock from FP in exchange for a note and uses the FP stock to acquire all the stock of UST. The shareholders of UST receive 75 percent of the outstanding FP stock. The stock in USS is not a United States real property interest (within the meaning of section 897(c)), and FP would not be subject to U.S. tax under section 882 on a disposition of the stock of USS. The transaction is structured to result in a small amount of dividend income that would be subject to U.S. withholding tax on a distribution and in a significant amount of section 367(b) income in the form of section 301(c)(3) gain. The taxpayer takes the position that the transaction avoids the application of the no-U.S.-tax exception because of the small amount of dividend income. In addition, the taxpayer takes the position that the section 367(b) priority rule applies because the section 367(b) income recognized by FP by reason of the application of § 1.367(b)–10 exceeds the amount of gain that would be recognized by shareholders of UST under section 367(a)(1) with respect to the UST stock. This position is taken even though the section 301(c)(3) gain that FP recognizes by reason of the application of § 1.367(b)–10 (and therefore takes into account in determining section 367(b) income) is not subject to U.S. tax. Finally, the taxpayer takes the position that the anti-abuse rule does not apply with respect to the earnings and profits of UST (see further discussion of this position below). Based on the policy underlying the priority rules, the IRS and the Treasury Department believe that section 367(b) income should include only dividend income and gain that are subject to U.S. tax or dividend income and gain that give rise to an income inclusion under section 951(a)(1)(A) that is subject to U.S. tax. The IRS and the Treasury Department are also concerned that some taxpayers may be taking the position that the no-U.S.-tax exception is inapplicable when S (the stock of which is not a United States real property interest) has no current or accumulated earnings and profits based on the fact that if S instead did have current or accumulated earnings and profits, the resulting dividend would be subject to U.S. tax. The IRS and the Treasury Department disagree with this interpretation of the no-U.S.-tax exception. Finally, the IRS and the Treasury Department are concerned that some taxpayers may be interpreting the anti-abuse rule too narrowly, including with respect to what constitutes a funding for purposes of invoking the anti-abuse rule. In addition, the IRS and the Treasury Department understand that taxpayers may be taking the position that the anti-abuse rule does not apply with respect to the earnings and profits of T, including in cases where T is unrelated to P and S before the triangular reorganization or where T is acquired pursuant to a triangular asset reorganization. The IRS and the Treasury Department disagree with these interpretations. The IRS and the Treasury Department believe that these transactions raise significant policy concerns and will revise the final regulations in the manner described in Section 4 of this notice. SECTION 4. REGULATIONS TO BE ISSUED .01 Deemed Distribution and Contribution Rules The rules in § 1.367(b)–10(b)(2) and –10(c)(2) (regarding deemed contributions) will be removed. Conforming changes will be made to other parts of the final regulations. For example, the rule in § 1.367(b)–10(b)(3) will be modified so that it refers only to a deemed distribution occurring as a separate transaction. In addition, the rule in § 1.367(b)–10(b)(4) will be modified to provide that P’s adjustment to the basis in its S stock under § 1.358–6 will be determined as if P provided the P stock or securities pursuant to the plan of reorganization, notwithstanding that S in fact acquired the P stock or securities in exchange for property in the P acquisition. .02 Triangular Reorganizations Exempt from the Final Regulations The section 367(a) priority rule under § 1.367(b)–10 will be modified by adjusting the amount of income or gain that is considered section 367(b) income for this purpose. Regulations will provide that section 367(b) income includes a section 301(c)(1) dividend or section 301(c)(3) gain that would arise if § 1.367(b)–10 applied to the triangular reorganization only to the extent such dividend income or gain would be subject to U.S. tax or would give rise to an income inclusion under section 951(a)(1)(A) that would be subject to U.S. tax. A conforming change will be made to the section 367(b) priority rule under § 1.367(a)–3(a)(2)(iv). In addition, the no-U.S.-tax exception will be modified to provide that the exception will not be available if P is a controlled foreign corporation. Furthermore, where P is not a controlled foreign corporation, S is a domestic corporation, and P’s stock in S is not a United States real property interest, the regulations will clarify that the no-U.S.-tax exception will apply if the deemed distribution that would result from application of § 1.367(b)–10 to the triangular reorganization would not be treated as a dividend under section 301(c)(1) that would be subject to U.S. tax (for example, by reason of an applicable treaty or by reason of an absence of earnings and profits). .03 Anti-Abuse Rule The anti-abuse rule in § 1.367(b)–10(d) will be clarified to provide that S’s acquisition of P stock or securities in exchange for a note may invoke the anti-abuse rule. In addition, § 1.367(b)–10(d) will be clarified to provide that the earnings and profits of a corporation (or a successor corporation) may be taken into account for purposes of determining the consequences of the adjustments provided in the final regulations, as modified by the rules announced in this notice, regardless of whether such corporation is related to P or S before the triangular reorganization. Thus, the earnings and profits of T (or a successor to T) or a subsidiary of S or T may be taken into account for purposes of determining the consequences of the adjustments provided in the final regulations, as modified by the rules announced in this notice. Section 1.367(b)–10(d) also will be clarified to provide that a funding of S may occur after the triangular reorganization and that a funding of S includes capital contributions, loans, and distributions. .04 Example The following example illustrates certain clarifications and modifications to the final regulations announced in section 4 of this notice: (i) Facts. FP is a foreign corporation that wholly owns USS, a domestic corporation with no assets and no earnings and profits. FP transfers $100x of newly issued FP stock to USS in exchange for $10x of USS stock and a $90x note issued by USS. FP would be subject to U.S. tax under section 881 on a distribution from USS if, contrary to the facts here, USS had earnings and profits for purposes of applying section 301(c)(1) to the distribution. USS acquires all the stock of UST, an unrelated domestic corporation that is wholly owned by a foreign person, in exchange for the $100x of FP stock in a triangular reorganization described in section 368(a)(1)(B). At the time of the acquisition, UST has $100x of earnings and profits. USS’s purchase of the FP stock for its note in connection with the triangular reorganization is engaged in with a view to avoid the purpose of § 1.367(b)–10 because the parties seek to transfer property to FP without incurring U.S. tax. (ii) Analysis. The triangular reorganization is described in § 1.367(b)–10(a) of the final regulations. Pursuant to § 1.367(b)–10(b)(1) of the final regulations, as modified by the rules announced in this notice, adjustments must be made that are consistent with the adjustments that would have been made if USS had in fact distributed the $90x note to FP in a distribution to which section 301 would apply. Because USS’s purchase of the FP stock for its note is engaged in with a view to avoid the purposes of § 1.367(b)–10, the anti-abuse rule applies and therefore appropriate adjustments are made. In particular, for purposes of determining the consequences of the adjustments provided in the final regulations, as modified by the rules announced in this notice, the earnings and profits of USS are deemed to include the earnings and profits of UST. The $90x deemed distribution is treated as separate from, and occurring immediately before, USS’s acquisition of the FP stock used in the triangular reorganization. Pursuant to this notice, § 1.367(b)–10(b)(2) and –10(c)(2) of the final regulations (regarding a deemed contribution) are removed. Therefore, no adjustments are made by FP to its USS stock except as provided in § 1.358–6. Pursuant to this notice, FP’s adjustment to the basis in its USS stock under § 1.358–6 is determined as if FP provided the FP stock pursuant to the plan of reorganization. SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE Except as otherwise provided in this section 5, the regulations described in section 4 of this notice will apply to a triangular reorganization that is completed on or after April 25, 2014. The regulations described in this notice will not apply if (i) T was not related to P or S (within the meaning of section 267(b)) immediately before the triangular reorganization; (ii) the triangular reorganization was entered into either pursuant to a written agreement that was (subject to customary conditions) binding before April 25, 2014 and all times afterward, or pursuant to a tender offer announced before April 25, 2014 that is subject to section 14(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78n(d)(1)) and Regulation 14(D) (17 CFR 240.14d–1 through 240.14d–101) or that is subject to comparable foreign laws; and (iii) to the extent the P acquisition that occurs pursuant to the plan of reorganization is not completed before April 25, 2014, the P acquisition was included as part of the plan before April 25, 2014. No inference is intended regarding the treatment of transactions described in section 3 of this notice under current law, and the IRS may challenge such transactions under applicable Code provisions or judicial doctrines. SECTION 6. DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal author of this notice is Shane McCarrick of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International). However, other personnel from the IRS and the Treasury Department participated in its development. For further information regarding this notice, contact Mr. McCarrick at (202) 317-6937 (not a toll-free number). Rev. Proc. 2014–30 SECTION 1. PURPOSE This revenue procedure provides the 2015 inflation adjusted amounts for Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) as determined under § 223 of the Internal Revenue Code. SECTION 2. 2015 INFLATION ADJUSTED ITEMS Annual contribution limitation. For calendar year 2015, the annual limitation on deductions under § 223(b)(2)(A) for an individual with self-only coverage under a high deductible health plan is $3,350. For calendar year 2015, the annual limitation on deductions under § 223(b)(2)(B) for an individual with family coverage under a high deductible health plan is $6,650. High deductible health plan. For calendar year 2015, a “high deductible health plan” is defined under § 223(c)(2)(A) as a health plan with an annual deductible that is not less than $1,300 for self-only coverage or $2,600 for family coverage, and the annual out-of-pocket expenses (deductibles, co-payments, and other amounts, but not premiums) do not exceed $6,450 for self-only coverage or $12,900 for family coverage. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE This revenue procedure is effective for calendar year 2015. SECTION 4. DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal author of this revenue procedure is Bill Ruane of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax & Accounting). For further information regarding § 223 and HSAs, contact Karen Levin at (202) 317-5500 (not a toll free number). For further information regarding the calculation of the inflation adjustments in this revenue procedure, contact Mr. Ruane at (202) 317-4718 (not a toll free number). Rev. Proc. 2014–31 SECTION 1. PURPOSE This revenue procedure provides issuers of qualified mortgage bonds, as defined in section 143(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, and issuers of mortgage credit certificates, as defined in section 25(c), with (1) the nationwide average purchase price for residences located in the United States, and (2) average area purchase price safe harbors for residences located in statistical areas in each state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and Guam. SECTION 2. BACKGROUND .01 Section 103(a) provides that, except as provided in section 103(b), gross income does not include interest on any state or local bond. Section 103(b)(1) provides that section 103(a) shall not apply to any private activity bond that is not a “qualified bond” within the meaning of section 141. Section 141(e) provides, in part, that the term “qualified bond” means any private activity bond if such bond (1) is a qualified mortgage bond under section 143, (2) meets the volume cap requirements under section 146, and (3) meets the applicable requirements under section 147. .02 Section 143(a)(1) provides that the term “qualified mortgage bond” means a bond that is issued as part of a qualified mortgage issue. Section 143(a)(2)(A) provides that the term “qualified mortgage issue” means an issue of one or more bonds by a state or political subdivision thereof, but only if: (i) all proceeds of the issue (exclusive of issuance costs and a reasonably required reserve) are to be used to finance owner-occupied residences; (ii) the issue meets the requirements of subsections (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), and (m)(7) of section 143; (iii) the issue does not meet the private business tests of paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 141(b); and (iv) with respect to amounts received more than 10 years after the date of issuance, repayments of $250,000 or more of principal on mortgage financing provided by the issue are used by the close of the first semiannual period beginning after the date the prepayment (or complete repayment) is received to redeem bonds that are part of the issue. Average Area Purchase Price .03 Section 143(e)(1) provides that an issue of bonds meets the purchase price requirements of section 143(e) if the acquisition cost of each residence financed by the issue does not exceed 90 percent of the average area purchase price applicable to such residence. Section 143(e)(5) provides that, in the case of a targeted area residence (as defined in section 143(j)), section 143(e)(1) shall be applied by substituting 110 percent for 90 percent. .04 Section 143(e)(2) provides that the term “average area purchase price” means, with respect to any residence, the average purchase price of single-family residences (in the statistical area in which the residence is located) that were purchased during the most recent 12-month period for which sufficient statistical information is available. Under sections 143(e)(3) and (4), respectively, separate determinations are to be made for new and existing residences, and for two-, three-, and four-family residences. .05 Section 143(e)(2) provides that the determination of the average area purchase price for a statistical area shall be made as of the date on which the commitment to provide the financing is made or, if earlier, the date of the purchase of the residence. .06 Section 143(k)(2)(A) provides that the term “statistical area” means (i) a metropolitan statistical area (MSA), and (ii) any county (or the portion thereof) that is not within an MSA. Section 143(k)(2)(C) further provides that if sufficient recent statistical information with respect to a county (or portion thereof) is unavailable, the Secretary may substitute another area for which there is sufficient recent statistical information for such county (or portion thereof). In the case of any portion of a State which is not within a county, section 143(k)(2)(D) provides that the Secretary may designate as a county any area that is the equivalent of a county. Section 6a.103A–1(b)(4)(i) of the Temporary Income Tax Regulations (issued under section 103A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, the predecessor of section 143) provides that the term “State” includes a possession of the United States and the District of Columbia. .07 Section 6a.103A–2(f)(5)(i) provides that an issuer may rely upon the average area purchase price safe harbors published by the Department of the Treasury for the statistical area in which a residence is located. Section 6a.103A–2(f)(5)(i) further provides that an issuer may use an average area purchase price limitation different from the published safe harbor if the issuer has more accurate and comprehensive data for the statistical area. Qualified Mortgage Credit Certificate Program .08 Section 25(c) permits a state or political subdivision to establish a qualified mortgage credit certificate program. In general, a qualified mortgage credit certificate program is a program under which the issuing authority elects not to issue an amount of private activity bonds that it may otherwise issue during the calendar year under section 146, and in their place, issues mortgage credit certificates to taxpayers in connection with the acquisition of their principal residences. Section 25(a)(1) provides, in general, that the holder of a mortgage credit certificate may claim a federal income tax credit equal to the product of the credit rate specified in the certificate and the interest paid or accrued during the tax year on the remaining principal of the indebtedness incurred to acquire the residence. Section 25(c)(2)(A)(iii)(III) generally provides that residences acquired in connection with the issuance of mortgage credit certificates must meet the purchase price requirements of section 143(e). Income Limitations for Qualified Mortgage Bonds and Mortgage Credit Certificates .09 Section 143(f) imposes limitations on the income of mortgagors for whom financing may be provided by qualified mortgage bonds. In addition, section 25(c)(2)(A)(iii)(IV) provides that holders of mortgage credit certificates must meet the income requirement of section 143(f). Generally, under sections 143(f)(1) and 25(c)(2)(A)(iii)(IV), the income requirement is met only if all owner-financing under a qualified mortgage bond and all mortgage credit certificates issued under a qualified mortgage credit certificate program are provided to mortgagors whose family income is 115 percent or less of the applicable median family income. Section 143(f)(5), however, generally provides for an upward adjustment to the percentage limitation in high housing cost areas. High housing cost areas are defined in section 143(f)(5)(C) as any statistical area for which the housing cost/income ratio is greater than 1.2. .10 Under section 143(f)(5)(D), the housing cost/income ratio with respect to any statistical area is determined by dividing (a) the applicable housing price ratio for such area by (b) the ratio that the area median gross income for such area bears to the median gross income for the United States. The applicable housing price ratio is the new housing price ratio (new housing average area purchase price divided by the new housing average purchase price for the United States) or the existing housing price ratio (existing housing average area purchase price divided by the existing housing average purchase price for the United States), whichever results in the housing cost/income ratio being closer to 1. Average Area and Nationwide Purchase Price Limitations .11 Average area purchase price safe harbors for each state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and Guam were last published in Rev. Proc. 2013–28, 2013–27 I.R.B. 28. .12 The nationwide average purchase price limitation was last published in section 4.02 of Rev. Proc. 2013–28. Guidance with respect to the United States and area median gross income figures that are to be used in computing the housing cost/income ratio described in section 143(f)(5) was last published in Rev. Proc. 2014–23, 2014–12 I.R.B. 684. .13 This revenue procedure uses FHA loan limits for a given statistical area to calculate the average area purchase price safe harbor for that area. FHA sets limits on the dollar value of loans it will insure based on median home prices and conforming loan limits established by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. In particular, FHA sets an area’s loan limit at 95 percent of the median home sales price for the area, subject to certain floors and caps measured against conforming loan limits. .14 To calculate the average area purchase price safe harbors in this revenue procedure, the FHA loan limits are adjusted to take into account the differences between average and median purchase prices. Because FHA loan limits do not differentiate between new and existing residences, this revenue procedure contains a single average area purchase price safe harbor for both new and existing residences in a statistical area. The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service have determined that FHA loan limits provide a reasonable basis for determining average area purchase price safe harbors. If the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service become aware of other sources of average purchase price data, including data that differentiate between new and existing residences, consideration will be given as to whether such data provide a more accurate method for calculating average area purchase price safe harbors. .15 The average area purchase price safe harbors listed in section 4.01 of this revenue procedure are based on FHA loan limits released December 6, 2013. FHA loan limits are available for statistical areas in each state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and Guam. See section 3.03 of this revenue procedure with respect to FHA loan limits revised after December 6, 2013. .16 OMB Bulletin No. 03–04, dated and effective June 6, 2003, revised the definitions of the nation’s metropolitan areas and recognized 49 new metropolitan statistical areas. The OMB bulletin no longer includes primary metropolitan statistical areas. SECTION 3. APPLICATION Average Area Purchase Price Safe Harbors .01 Average area purchase price safe harbors for statistical areas in each state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and Guam are set forth in section 4.01 of this revenue procedure. Average area purchase price safe harbors are provided for single-family and two to four-family residences. For each type of residence, section 4.01 of this revenue procedure contains a single safe harbor that may be used for both new and existing residences. Issuers of qualified mortgage bonds and issuers of mortgage credit certificates may rely on these safe harbors to satisfy the requirements of sections 143(e) and (f). Section 4.01 of this revenue procedure provides safe harbors for MSAs and for certain counties and county equivalents. If no purchase price safe harbor is available for a statistical area, the safe harbor for “ALL OTHER AREAS” may be used for that statistical area. .02 If a residence is in an MSA, the safe harbor applicable to it is the limitation of that MSA. If an MSA falls in more than one state, the MSA is listed in section 4.01 of this revenue procedure under each state. .03 If the FHA revises the FHA loan limit for any statistical area after December 6, 2013, an issuer of qualified mortgage bonds or mortgage credit certificates may use the revised FHA loan limit for that statistical area to compute (as provided in the next sentence) a revised average area purchase price safe harbor for the statistical area provided that the issuer maintains records evidencing the revised FHA loan limit. The revised average area purchase price safe harbor for that statistical area is computed by dividing the revised FHA loan limit by .92. .04 If, pursuant to section 6a.103A–2(f)(5)(i), an issuer uses more accurate and comprehensive data to determine the average area purchase price for a statistical area, the issuer must make separate average area purchase price determinations for new and existing residences. Moreover, when computing the average area purchase price for a statistical area that is an MSA, as defined in OMB Bulletin No. 03–04, the issuer must make the computation for the entire applicable MSA. When computing the average area purchase price for a statistical area that is not an MSA, the issuer must make the computation for the entire statistical area and may not combine statistical areas. Thus, for example, the issuer may not combine two or more counties. .05 If an issuer receives a ruling permitting it to rely on an average area purchase price limitation that is higher than the applicable safe harbor in this revenue procedure, the issuer may rely on that higher limitation for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of section 143(e) and (f) for bonds sold, and mortgage credit certificates issued, not more than 30 months following the termination date of the 12-month period used by the issuer to compute the limitation. Nationwide Average Purchase Price .06 Section 4.02 of this revenue procedure sets forth a single nationwide average purchase price for purposes of computing the housing cost/income ratio under section 143(f)(5). .07 Issuers must use the nationwide average purchase price set forth in section 4.02 of this revenue procedure when computing the housing cost/income ratio under section 143(f)(5) regardless of whether they are relying on the average area purchase price safe harbors contained in this revenue procedure or using more accurate and comprehensive data to determine average area purchase prices for new and existing residences for a statistical area that are different from the published safe harbors in this revenue procedure. .08 If, pursuant to section 6.02 of this revenue procedure, an issuer relies on the average area purchase price safe harbors contained in Rev. Proc. 2013–28, the issuer must use the nationwide average purchase price set forth in section 4.02 of Rev. Proc. 2013–28 in computing the housing cost/income ratio under section 143(f)(5). Likewise, if, pursuant to section 6.05 of this revenue procedure, an issuer relies on the nationwide average purchase price published in Rev. Proc. 2013–28, the issuer may not rely on the average area purchase price safe harbors published in this revenue procedure. SECTION 4. AVERAGE AREA AND NATIONWIDE AVERAGE PURCHASE PRICES .01 Average area purchase prices for single-family and two to four-family residences in MSAs, and for certain counties and county equivalents are set forth below. The safe harbor for “ALL OTHER AREAS” (found at the end of the table below) may be used for a statistical area that is not listed below. 2014 Average Area Purchase Prices for Mortgage Revenue Bonds County Name State One-Unit Limit Two-Unit Limit Three-Unit Limit Four-Unit Limit ALEUTIANS WEST CENSUS AK $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 ANCHORAGE MUNICIPALITY AK $386,250 $494,457 $597,663 $742,772 BRISTOL BAY BOROUGH AK $318,750 $408,043 $493,207 $612,989 DENALI BOROUGH AK $323,750 $414,457 $500,978 $622,609 FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR AK $298,750 $382,446 $462,283 $574,511 HAINES BOROUGH AK $308,750 $395,217 $477,772 $593,750 JUNEAU CITY AND BOROUGH AK $393,750 $504,076 $609,293 $757,228 KETCHIKAN GATEWAY BOROUGH AK $350,000 $448,043 $541,576 $673,098 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH AK $415,000 $531,250 $642,174 $798,098 MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH AK $386,250 $494,457 $597,663 $742,772 NOME CENSUS AREA AK $298,750 $382,446 $462,283 $574,511 NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH AK $361,250 $462,446 $559,022 $694,728 PETERSBURG CENSUS AREA AK $361,250 $462,446 $559,022 $694,728 SITKA CITY AND BOROUGH AK $436,250 $558,478 $675,054 $838,967 VALDEZ-CORDOVA CENSUS AK $318,750 $408,043 $493,207 $612,989 WRANGELL CITY AND BOROUGH AK $361,250 $462,446 $559,022 $694,728 YAKUTAT CITY AND BOROUGH AK $457,500 $585,652 $707,935 $879,837 RUSSELL AL $315,000 $403,261 $487,446 $605,761 COCONINO AZ $393,750 $504,076 $609,293 $757,228 ALAMEDA CA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 ALPINE CA $503,750 $644,891 $779,511 $968,750 AMADOR CA $361,250 $462,446 $559,022 $694,728 BUTTE CA $318,750 $408,043 $493,207 $612,989 CALAVERAS CA $406,250 $520,054 $628,641 $781,250 CONTRA COSTA CA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 EL DORADO CA $516,250 $660,870 $798,859 $992,772 FRESNO CA $306,250 $392,065 $473,913 $588,913 HUMBOLDT CA $356,250 $456,033 $551,250 $685,109 INYO CA $401,250 $513,641 $620,924 $771,630 LOS ANGELES CA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 MARIN CA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 MARIPOSA CA $350,000 $448,043 $541,576 $673,098 MENDOCINO CA $406,250 $520,054 $628,641 $781,250 MONO CA $575,000 $736,087 $889,783 $1,105,761 MONTEREY CA $525,000 $672,065 $812,391 $1,009,620 NAPA CA $643,750 $824,130 $996,141 $1,237,989 NEVADA CA $518,750 $664,076 $802,717 $997,609 ORANGE CA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 PLACER CA $516,250 $660,870 $798,859 $992,772 PLUMAS CA $366,250 $468,859 $566,739 $704,348 RIVERSIDE CA $386,250 $494,457 $597,663 $742,772 SACRAMENTO CA $516,250 $660,870 $798,859 $992,772 SAN BENITO CA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 SAN BERNARDINO CA $386,250 $494,457 $597,663 $742,772 SAN DIEGO CA $593,750 $760,109 $918,804 $1,141,848 SAN FRANCISCO CA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 SAN JOAQUIN CA $331,250 $424,022 $512,554 $637,011 SAN LUIS OBISPO CA $610,000 $780,924 $943,913 $1,173,098 SAN MATEO CA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 SANTA BARBARA CA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 SANTA CLARA CA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 SANTA CRUZ CA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 SHASTA CA $297,500 $380,815 $460,326 $572,120 SIERRA CA $331,250 $424,022 $512,554 $637,011 SOLANO CA $435,000 $556,848 $673,152 $836,522 SONOMA CA $566,250 $724,891 $876,250 $1,088,967 STANISLAUS CA $300,000 $384,022 $464,239 $576,902 TUOLUMNE CA $360,000 $460,870 $557,065 $692,283 VENTURA CA $650,000 $832,120 $1,005,815 $1,250,000 YOLO CA $516,250 $660,870 $798,859 $992,772 ADAMS CO $425,000 $544,076 $657,663 $817,283 ARAPAHOE CO $425,000 $544,076 $657,663 $817,283 ARCHULETA CO $310,000 $396,848 $479,674 $596,141 BOULDER CO $443,750 $568,043 $686,685 $853,370 BROOMFIELD CO $425,000 $544,076 $657,663 $817,283 CHAFFEE CO $298,750 $382,446 $462,283 $574,511 CLEAR CREEK CO $425,000 $544,076 $657,663 $817,283 DENVER CO $425,000 $544,076 $657,663 $817,283 DOUGLAS CO $425,000 $544,076 $657,663 $817,283 EAGLE CO $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 ELBERT CO $425,000 $544,076 $657,663 $817,283 GARFIELD CO $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 GILPIN CO $425,000 $544,076 $657,663 $817,283 GRAND CO $362,500 $464,076 $560,924 $697,120 GUNNISON CO $388,750 $497,663 $601,576 $747,609 HINSDALE CO $465,000 $595,272 $719,565 $894,239 JEFFERSON CO $425,000 $544,076 $657,663 $817,283 LA PLATA CO $412,500 $528,043 $638,315 $793,261 LARIMER CO $300,000 $384,022 $464,239 $576,902 MESA CO $307,500 $393,641 $475,815 $591,359 OURAY CO $462,500 $592,065 $715,707 $889,402 PARK CO $425,000 $544,076 $657,663 $817,283 PITKIN CO $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 ROUTT CO $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 SAN MIGUEL CO $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 SUMMIT CO $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 FAIRFIELD CT $653,750 $836,902 $1,011,630 $1,257,228 HARTFORD CT $383,750 $491,250 $593,804 $737,989 LITCHFIELD CT $388,750 $497,663 $601,576 $747,609 MIDDLESEX CT $383,750 $491,250 $593,804 $737,989 NEW HAVEN CT $332,500 $425,652 $514,511 $639,402 NEW LONDON CT $305,000 $390,435 $471,957 $586,522 TOLLAND CT $383,750 $491,250 $593,804 $737,989 WINDHAM CT $310,000 $396,848 $479,674 $596,141 COLUMBIA DC $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 NEW CASTLE DE $412,500 $528,043 $638,315 $793,261 SUSSEX DE $343,750 $440,054 $531,902 $661,033 BAKER FL $331,250 $424,022 $512,554 $637,011 BROWARD FL $375,000 $480,054 $580,272 $721,141 CLAY FL $331,250 $424,022 $512,554 $637,011 COLLIER FL $487,500 $624,076 $754,348 $937,500 DUVAL FL $331,250 $424,022 $512,554 $637,011 LAKE FL $298,750 $382,446 $462,283 $574,511 MANATEE FL $310,000 $396,848 $479,674 $596,141 MARTIN FL $343,750 $440,054 $531,902 $661,033 MIAMI-DADE FL $375,000 $480,054 $580,272 $721,141 MONROE FL $575,000 $736,087 $889,783 $1,105,761 NASSAU FL $331,250 $424,022 $512,554 $637,011 OKALOOSA FL $353,750 $452,826 $547,391 $680,272 ORANGE FL $298,750 $382,446 $462,283 $574,511 OSCEOLA FL $298,750 $382,446 $462,283 $574,511 PALM BEACH FL $375,000 $480,054 $580,272 $721,141 SARASOTA FL $310,000 $396,848 $479,674 $596,141 SEMINOLE FL $298,750 $382,446 $462,283 $574,511 ST. JOHNS FL $331,250 $424,022 $512,554 $637,011 ST. LUCIE FL $343,750 $440,054 $531,902 $661,033 WALTON FL $353,750 $452,826 $547,391 $680,272 BARROW GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 BARTOW GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 BUTTS GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 CARROLL GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 CHATTAHOOCHEE GA $315,000 $403,261 $487,446 $605,761 CHEROKEE GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 CLARKE GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 CLAYTON GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 COBB GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 COWETA GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 DAWSON GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 DEKALB GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 DOUGLAS GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 FAYETTE GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 FORSYTH GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 FULTON GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 GREENE GA $560,000 $716,902 $866,576 $1,076,957 GWINNETT GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 HARALSON GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 HARRIS GA $315,000 $403,261 $487,446 $605,761 HEARD GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 HENRY GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 JASPER GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 LAMAR GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 MADISON GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 MARION GA $315,000 $403,261 $487,446 $605,761 MERIWETHER GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 MORGAN GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 MUSCOGEE GA $315,000 $403,261 $487,446 $605,761 NEWTON GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 OCONEE GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 OGLETHORPE GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 PAULDING GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 PICKENS GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 PIKE GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 ROCKDALE GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 SPALDING GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 WALTON GA $348,750 $446,467 $539,674 $670,652 HAWAII HI $400,000 $512,065 $618,967 $769,239 HONOLULU HI $783,750 $1,003,315 $1,212,826 $1,507,228 KALAWAO HI $715,000 $915,326 $1,106,413 $1,375,000 KAUAI HI $775,000 $992,120 $1,199,293 $1,490,380 MAUI HI $715,000 $915,326 $1,106,413 $1,375,000 BLAINE ID $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 CAMAS ID $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 LINCOLN ID $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 TETON ID $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 VALLEY ID $296,250 $379,239 $458,424 $569,728 BOONE IL $368,750 $472,065 $570,598 $709,130 COOK IL $397,500 $508,859 $615,109 $764,402 DEKALB IL $397,500 $508,859 $615,109 $764,402 DUPAGE IL $397,500 $508,859 $615,109 $764,402 GRUNDY IL $397,500 $508,859 $615,109 $764,402 KANE IL $397,500 $508,859 $615,109 $764,402 KENDALL IL $397,500 $508,859 $615,109 $764,402 LAKE IL $397,500 $508,859 $615,109 $764,402 MCHENRY IL $397,500 $508,859 $615,109 $764,402 WILL IL $397,500 $508,859 $615,109 $764,402 WINNEBAGO IL $368,750 $472,065 $570,598 $709,130 JASPER IN $397,500 $508,859 $615,109 $764,402 LAKE IN $397,500 $508,859 $615,109 $764,402 NEWTON IN $397,500 $508,859 $615,109 $764,402 PORTER IN $397,500 $508,859 $615,109 $764,402 JOHNSON KS $302,500 $387,228 $468,098 $581,739 LEAVENWORTH KS $302,500 $387,228 $468,098 $581,739 LINN KS $302,500 $387,228 $468,098 $581,739 MIAMI KS $302,500 $387,228 $468,098 $581,739 WYANDOTTE KS $302,500 $387,228 $468,098 $581,739 BARNSTABLE MA $441,250 $564,891 $682,826 $848,533 BRISTOL MA $463,750 $593,696 $717,609 $891,848 DUKES MA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 ESSEX MA $511,250 $654,457 $791,141 $983,152 HAMPDEN MA $298,750 $382,446 $462,283 $574,511 HAMPSHIRE MA $298,750 $382,446 $462,283 $574,511 MIDDLESEX MA $511,250 $654,457 $791,141 $983,152 NANTUCKET MA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 NORFOLK MA $511,250 $654,457 $791,141 $983,152 PLYMOUTH MA $511,250 $654,457 $791,141 $983,152 SUFFOLK MA $511,250 $654,457 $791,141 $983,152 WORCESTER MA $310,000 $396,848 $479,674 $596,141 ANNE ARUNDEL MD $537,500 $688,098 $831,739 $1,033,641 BALTIMORE MD $537,500 $688,098 $831,739 $1,033,641 BALTIMORE CITY MD $537,500 $688,098 $831,739 $1,033,641 CALVERT MD $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 CARROLL MD $537,500 $688,098 $831,739 $1,033,641 CECIL MD $412,500 $528,043 $638,315 $793,261 CHARLES MD $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 FREDERICK MD $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 HARFORD MD $537,500 $688,098 $831,739 $1,033,641 HOWARD MD $537,500 $688,098 $831,739 $1,033,641 KENT MD $316,250 $404,837 $489,348 $608,152 MONTGOMERY MD $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 PRINCE GEORGE’S MD $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 QUEEN ANNE’S MD $537,500 $688,098 $831,739 $1,033,641 SOMERSET MD $343,750 $440,054 $531,902 $661,033 ST. MARY’S MD $377,500 $483,261 $584,130 $725,978 TALBOT MD $416,250 $532,880 $644,130 $800,489 WICOMICO MD $343,750 $440,054 $531,902 $661,033 WORCESTER MD $343,750 $440,054 $531,902 $661,033 CUMBERLAND ME $308,750 $395,217 $477,772 $593,750 HANCOCK ME $295,000 $377,663 $456,467 $567,283 KNOX ME $303,750 $388,859 $470,000 $584,130 SAGADAHOC ME $308,750 $395,217 $477,772 $593,750 YORK ME $308,750 $395,217 $477,772 $593,750 ANOKA MN $346,250 $443,261 $535,815 $665,870 CARVER MN $346,250 $443,261 $535,815 $665,870 CHISAGO MN $346,250 $443,261 $535,815 $665,870 COOK MN $307,500 $393,641 $475,815 $591,359 DAKOTA MN $346,250 $443,261 $535,815 $665,870 HENNEPIN MN $346,250 $443,261 $535,815 $665,870 ISANTI MN $346,250 $443,261 $535,815 $665,870 LE SUEUR MN $346,250 $443,261 $535,815 $665,870 MILLE LACS MN $346,250 $443,261 $535,815 $665,870 RAMSEY MN $346,250 $443,261 $535,815 $665,870 SCOTT MN $346,250 $443,261 $535,815 $665,870 SHERBURNE MN $346,250 $443,261 $535,815 $665,870 SIBLEY MN $346,250 $443,261 $535,815 $665,870 WASHINGTON MN $346,250 $443,261 $535,815 $665,870 WRIGHT MN $346,250 $443,261 $535,815 $665,870 BATES MO $302,500 $387,228 $468,098 $581,739 CALDWELL MO $302,500 $387,228 $468,098 $581,739 CASS MO $302,500 $387,228 $468,098 $581,739 CLAY MO $302,500 $387,228 $468,098 $581,739 CLINTON MO $302,500 $387,228 $468,098 $581,739 JACKSON MO $302,500 $387,228 $468,098 $581,739 LAFAYETTE MO $302,500 $387,228 $468,098 $581,739 PLATTE MO $302,500 $387,228 $468,098 $581,739 RAY MO $302,500 $387,228 $468,098 $581,739 COPIAH MS $300,000 $384,022 $464,239 $576,902 HINDS MS $300,000 $384,022 $464,239 $576,902 MADISON MS $300,000 $384,022 $464,239 $576,902 RANKIN MS $300,000 $384,022 $464,239 $576,902 SIMPSON MS $300,000 $384,022 $464,239 $576,902 YAZOO MS $300,000 $384,022 $464,239 $576,902 FLATHEAD MT $327,500 $419,239 $506,793 $629,783 GALLATIN MT $376,250 $481,630 $582,228 $723,533 JEFFERSON MT $311,250 $398,424 $481,630 $598,533 LEWIS AND CLARK MT $311,250 $398,424 $481,630 $598,533 MADISON MT $353,750 $452,826 $547,391 $680,272 MISSOULA MT $307,500 $393,641 $475,815 $591,359 SWEET GRASS MT $315,000 $403,261 $487,446 $605,761 CAMDEN NC $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 CHATHAM NC $363,750 $465,652 $562,880 $699,511 CURRITUCK NC $498,750 $638,478 $771,793 $959,130 DARE NC $425,000 $544,076 $657,663 $817,283 DURHAM NC $363,750 $465,652 $562,880 $699,511 FRANKLIN NC $305,000 $390,435 $471,957 $586,522 GATES NC $498,750 $638,478 $771,793 $959,130 HYDE NC $525,000 $672,065 $812,391 $1,009,620 JOHNSTON NC $305,000 $390,435 $471,957 $586,522 ORANGE NC $363,750 $465,652 $562,880 $699,511 PASQUOTANK NC $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 PERQUIMANS NC $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 PERSON NC $363,750 $465,652 $562,880 $699,511 TYRRELL NC $425,000 $544,076 $657,663 $817,283 WAKE NC $305,000 $390,435 $471,957 $586,522 WATAUGA NC $298,750 $382,446 $462,283 $574,511 BILLINGS ND $331,250 $424,022 $512,554 $637,011 STARK ND $297,500 $380,815 $460,326 $572,120 WILLIAMS ND $300,000 $384,022 $464,239 $576,902 HILLSBOROUGH NH $321,250 $411,250 $497,120 $617,772 ROCKINGHAM NH $511,250 $654,457 $791,141 $983,152 STRAFFORD NH $511,250 $654,457 $791,141 $983,152 ATLANTIC NJ $343,750 $440,054 $531,902 $661,033 BERGEN NJ $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 BURLINGTON NJ $412,500 $528,043 $638,315 $793,261 CAMDEN NJ $412,500 $528,043 $638,315 $793,261 CAPE MAY NJ $450,000 $576,087 $696,359 $865,380 ESSEX NJ $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 GLOUCESTER NJ $412,500 $528,043 $638,315 $793,261 HUDSON NJ $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 HUNTERDON NJ $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 MERCER NJ $375,000 $480,054 $580,272 $721,141 MIDDLESEX NJ $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 MONMOUTH NJ $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 MORRIS NJ $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 OCEAN NJ $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 PASSAIC NJ $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 SALEM NJ $412,500 $528,043 $638,315 $793,261 SOMERSET NJ $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 SUSSEX NJ $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 UNION NJ $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 WARREN NJ $405,000 $518,478 $626,685 $778,859 LOS ALAMOS NM $413,750 $529,674 $640,217 $795,652 SANTA FE NM $400,000 $512,065 $618,967 $769,239 TAOS NM $311,250 $398,424 $481,630 $598,533 CARSON CITY NV $311,250 $398,424 $481,630 $598,533 CLARK NV $312,500 $400,054 $483,587 $600,978 DOUGLAS NV $381,250 $488,043 $589,946 $733,152 STOREY NV $353,750 $452,826 $547,391 $680,272 WASHOE NV $353,750 $452,826 $547,391 $680,272 ALBANY NY $317,500 $406,467 $491,304 $610,543 BRONX NY $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 DUTCHESS NY $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 KINGS NY $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 NASSAU NY $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 NEW YORK NY $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 ORANGE NY $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 PUTNAM NY $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 QUEENS NY $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 RENSSELAER NY $317,500 $406,467 $491,304 $610,543 RICHMOND NY $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 ROCKLAND NY $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 SARATOGA NY $317,500 $406,467 $491,304 $610,543 SCHENECTADY NY $317,500 $406,467 $491,304 $610,543 SCHOHARIE NY $317,500 $406,467 $491,304 $610,543 SUFFOLK NY $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 WESTCHESTER NY $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 DELAWARE OH $337,500 $432,065 $522,228 $649,022 FAIRFIELD OH $337,500 $432,065 $522,228 $649,022 FRANKLIN OH $337,500 $432,065 $522,228 $649,022 HOCKING OH $337,500 $432,065 $522,228 $649,022 LICKING OH $337,500 $432,065 $522,228 $649,022 MADISON OH $337,500 $432,065 $522,228 $649,022 MORROW OH $337,500 $432,065 $522,228 $649,022 PERRY OH $337,500 $432,065 $522,228 $649,022 PICKAWAY OH $337,500 $432,065 $522,228 $649,022 UNION OH $337,500 $432,065 $522,228 $649,022 BENTON OR $325,000 $416,033 $502,880 $625,000 CLACKAMAS OR $393,750 $504,076 $609,293 $757,228 CLATSOP OR $306,250 $392,065 $473,913 $588,913 COLUMBIA OR $393,750 $504,076 $609,293 $757,228 CURRY OR $356,250 $456,033 $551,250 $685,109 DESCHUTES OR $332,500 $425,652 $514,511 $639,402 HOOD RIVER OR $403,750 $516,848 $624,783 $776,467 JACKSON OR $303,750 $388,859 $470,000 $584,130 LINCOLN OR $300,000 $384,022 $464,239 $576,902 MULTNOMAH OR $393,750 $504,076 $609,293 $757,228 TILLAMOOK OR $312,500 $400,054 $483,587 $600,978 WASHINGTON OR $393,750 $504,076 $609,293 $757,228 YAMHILL OR $393,750 $504,076 $609,293 $757,228 BUCKS PA $412,500 $528,043 $638,315 $793,261 CARBON PA $405,000 $518,478 $626,685 $778,859 CHESTER PA $412,500 $528,043 $638,315 $793,261 DELAWARE PA $412,500 $528,043 $638,315 $793,261 LEHIGH PA $405,000 $518,478 $626,685 $778,859 MONTGOMERY PA $412,500 $528,043 $638,315 $793,261 NORTHAMPTON PA $405,000 $518,478 $626,685 $778,859 PHILADELPHIA PA $412,500 $528,043 $638,315 $793,261 PIKE PA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 BRISTOL RI $463,750 $593,696 $717,609 $891,848 KENT RI $463,750 $593,696 $717,609 $891,848 NEWPORT RI $463,750 $593,696 $717,609 $891,848 PROVIDENCE RI $463,750 $593,696 $717,609 $891,848 WASHINGTON RI $463,750 $593,696 $717,609 $891,848 BEAUFORT SC $381,250 $488,043 $589,946 $733,152 BERKELEY SC $335,000 $428,859 $518,370 $644,239 CHARLESTON SC $335,000 $428,859 $518,370 $644,239 DORCHESTER SC $335,000 $428,859 $518,370 $644,239 GEORGETOWN SC $356,250 $456,033 $551,250 $685,109 JASPER SC $381,250 $488,043 $589,946 $733,152 CANNON TN $427,500 $547,283 $661,522 $822,120 CHEATHAM TN $427,500 $547,283 $661,522 $822,120 DAVIDSON TN $427,500 $547,283 $661,522 $822,120 DICKSON TN $427,500 $547,283 $661,522 $822,120 HICKMAN TN $427,500 $547,283 $661,522 $822,120 MACON TN $427,500 $547,283 $661,522 $822,120 MAURY TN $427,500 $547,283 $661,522 $822,120 ROBERTSON TN $427,500 $547,283 $661,522 $822,120 RUTHERFORD TN $427,500 $547,283 $661,522 $822,120 SMITH TN $427,500 $547,283 $661,522 $822,120 SUMNER TN $427,500 $547,283 $661,522 $822,120 TROUSDALE TN $427,500 $547,283 $661,522 $822,120 WILLIAMSON TN $427,500 $547,283 $661,522 $822,120 WILSON TN $427,500 $547,283 $661,522 $822,120 ATASCOSA TX $343,750 $440,054 $531,902 $661,033 AUSTIN TX $321,250 $411,250 $497,120 $617,772 BANDERA TX $343,750 $440,054 $531,902 $661,033 BASTROP TX $332,500 $425,652 $514,511 $639,402 BEXAR TX $343,750 $440,054 $531,902 $661,033 BRAZORIA TX $321,250 $411,250 $497,120 $617,772 CALDWELL TX $332,500 $425,652 $514,511 $639,402 CHAMBERS TX $321,250 $411,250 $497,120 $617,772 COLLIN TX $312,500 $400,054 $483,587 $600,978 COMAL TX $343,750 $440,054 $531,902 $661,033 DALLAS TX $312,500 $400,054 $483,587 $600,978 DENTON TX $312,500 $400,054 $483,587 $600,978 ELLIS TX $312,500 $400,054 $483,587 $600,978 FORT BEND TX $321,250 $411,250 $497,120 $617,772 GALVESTON TX $321,250 $411,250 $497,120 $617,772 GUADALUPE TX $343,750 $440,054 $531,902 $661,033 HARRIS TX $321,250 $411,250 $497,120 $617,772 HAYS TX $332,500 $425,652 $514,511 $639,402 HOOD TX $312,500 $400,054 $483,587 $600,978 HUNT TX $312,500 $400,054 $483,587 $600,978 JOHNSON TX $312,500 $400,054 $483,587 $600,978 KAUFMAN TX $312,500 $400,054 $483,587 $600,978 KENDALL TX $343,750 $440,054 $531,902 $661,033 LIBERTY TX $321,250 $411,250 $497,120 $617,772 MEDINA TX $343,750 $440,054 $531,902 $661,033 MONTGOMERY TX $321,250 $411,250 $497,120 $617,772 PARKER TX $312,500 $400,054 $483,587 $600,978 ROCKWALL TX $312,500 $400,054 $483,587 $600,978 SOMERVELL TX $312,500 $400,054 $483,587 $600,978 TARRANT TX $312,500 $400,054 $483,587 $600,978 TRAVIS TX $332,500 $425,652 $514,511 $639,402 WALLER TX $321,250 $411,250 $497,120 $617,772 WILLIAMSON TX $332,500 $425,652 $514,511 $639,402 WILSON TX $343,750 $440,054 $531,902 $661,033 WISE TX $312,500 $400,054 $483,587 $600,978 BOX ELDER UT $423,750 $542,446 $655,707 $814,891 DAGGETT UT $328,750 $420,870 $508,696 $632,228 DAVIS UT $423,750 $542,446 $655,707 $814,891 MORGAN UT $423,750 $542,446 $655,707 $814,891 RICH UT $322,500 $412,826 $499,022 $620,163 SALT LAKE UT $326,250 $417,663 $504,837 $627,391 SUMMIT UT $652,500 $835,326 $1,009,728 $1,254,837 TOOELE UT $326,250 $417,663 $504,837 $627,391 WASATCH UT $360,000 $460,870 $557,065 $692,283 WASHINGTON UT $302,500 $387,228 $468,098 $581,739 WEBER UT $423,750 $542,446 $655,707 $814,891 ALBEMARLE VA $475,000 $608,098 $735,000 $913,478 ALEXANDRIA CITY VA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 AMELIA VA $582,500 $745,707 $901,359 $1,120,217 AMHERST VA $317,500 $406,467 $491,304 $610,543 APPOMATTOX VA $317,500 $406,467 $491,304 $610,543 ARLINGTON VA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 BEDFORD VA $317,500 $406,467 $491,304 $610,543 BEDFORD CITY VA $317,500 $406,467 $491,304 $610,543 BUCKINGHAM VA $475,000 $608,098 $735,000 $913,478 CAMPBELL VA $317,500 $406,467 $491,304 $610,543 CAROLINE VA $582,500 $745,707 $901,359 $1,120,217 CHARLES CITY VA $582,500 $745,707 $901,359 $1,120,217 CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY VA $475,000 $608,098 $735,000 $913,478 CHESAPEAKE CITY VA $498,750 $638,478 $771,793 $959,130 CHESTERFIELD VA $582,500 $745,707 $901,359 $1,120,217 CLARKE VA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 COLONIAL HEIGHTS CITY VA $582,500 $745,707 $901,359 $1,120,217 CULPEPER VA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 DINWIDDIE VA $582,500 $745,707 $901,359 $1,120,217 FAIRFAX VA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 FAIRFAX CITY VA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 FALLS CHURCH CITY VA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 FAUQUIER VA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 FLOYD VA $317,500 $406,467 $491,304 $610,543 FLUVANNA VA $475,000 $608,098 $735,000 $913,478 FREDERICK VA $295,000 $377,663 $456,467 $567,283 FREDERICKSBURG CITY VA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 GILES VA $317,500 $406,467 $491,304 $610,543 GLOUCESTER VA $498,750 $638,478 $771,793 $959,130 GOOCHLAND VA $582,500 $745,707 $901,359 $1,120,217 GREENE VA $475,000 $608,098 $735,000 $913,478 HAMPTON CITY VA $498,750 $638,478 $771,793 $959,130 HANOVER VA $582,500 $745,707 $901,359 $1,120,217 HARRISONBURG CITY VA $301,250 $385,652 $466,141 $579,293 HENRICO VA $582,500 $745,707 $901,359 $1,120,217 HOPEWELL CITY VA $582,500 $745,707 $901,359 $1,120,217 ISLE OF WIGHT VA $498,750 $638,478 $771,793 $959,130 JAMES CITY VA $498,750 $638,478 $771,793 $959,130 KING GEORGE VA $381,250 $488,043 $589,946 $733,152 KING WILLIAM VA $582,500 $745,707 $901,359 $1,120,217 LANCASTER VA $481,250 $616,087 $744,674 $925,489 LOUDOUN VA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 LYNCHBURG CITY VA $317,500 $406,467 $491,304 $610,543 MANASSAS CITY VA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 MANASSAS PARK CITY VA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 MATHEWS VA $498,750 $638,478 $771,793 $959,130 MONTGOMERY VA $317,500 $406,467 $491,304 $610,543 NELSON VA $475,000 $608,098 $735,000 $913,478 NEW KENT VA $582,500 $745,707 $901,359 $1,120,217 NEWPORT NEWS CITY VA $498,750 $638,478 $771,793 $959,130 NORFOLK CITY VA $498,750 $638,478 $771,793 $959,130 NORTHUMBERLAND VA $346,250 $443,261 $535,815 $665,870 PETERSBURG CITY VA $582,500 $745,707 $901,359 $1,120,217 POQUOSON CITY VA $498,750 $638,478 $771,793 $959,130 PORTSMOUTH CITY VA $498,750 $638,478 $771,793 $959,130 POWHATAN VA $582,500 $745,707 $901,359 $1,120,217 PRINCE GEORGE VA $582,500 $745,707 $901,359 $1,120,217 PRINCE WILLIAM VA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 PULASKI VA $317,500 $406,467 $491,304 $610,543 RADFORD CITY VA $317,500 $406,467 $491,304 $610,543 RAPPAHANNOCK VA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 RICHMOND CITY VA $582,500 $745,707 $901,359 $1,120,217 ROCKINGHAM VA $301,250 $385,652 $466,141 $579,293 SPOTSYLVANIA VA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 STAFFORD VA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 SUFFOLK CITY VA $498,750 $638,478 $771,793 $959,130 SUSSEX VA $582,500 $745,707 $901,359 $1,120,217 VIRGINIA BEACH CITY VA $498,750 $638,478 $771,793 $959,130 WARREN VA $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 WILLIAMSBURG CITY VA $498,750 $638,478 $771,793 $959,130 WINCHESTER CITY VA $295,000 $377,663 $456,467 $567,283 YORK VA $498,750 $638,478 $771,793 $959,130 BENNINGTON VT $301,250 $385,652 $466,141 $579,293 CHITTENDEN VT $372,500 $476,848 $576,413 $716,359 FRANKLIN VT $372,500 $476,848 $576,413 $716,359 GRAND ISLE VT $372,500 $476,848 $576,413 $716,359 LAMOILLE VT $300,000 $384,022 $464,239 $576,902 CHELAN WA $372,500 $476,848 $576,413 $716,359 CLALLAM WA $417,500 $534,457 $646,033 $802,880 CLARK WA $393,750 $504,076 $609,293 $757,228 DOUGLAS WA $372,500 $476,848 $576,413 $716,359 ISLAND WA $350,000 $448,043 $541,576 $673,098 JEFFERSON WA $350,000 $448,043 $541,576 $673,098 KING WA $550,000 $704,076 $851,087 $1,057,717 KITSAP WA $333,750 $427,228 $516,467 $641,848 PIERCE WA $550,000 $704,076 $851,087 $1,057,717 SAN JUAN WA $525,000 $672,065 $812,391 $1,009,620 SKAGIT WA $342,500 $438,424 $530,000 $658,641 SKAMANIA WA $393,750 $504,076 $609,293 $757,228 SNOHOMISH WA $550,000 $704,076 $851,087 $1,057,717 THURSTON WA $318,750 $408,043 $493,207 $612,989 WHATCOM WA $331,250 $424,022 $512,554 $637,011 KENOSHA WI $397,500 $508,859 $615,109 $764,402 MILWAUKEE WI $313,750 $401,630 $485,489 $603,370 OZAUKEE WI $313,750 $401,630 $485,489 $603,370 PIERCE WI $346,250 $443,261 $535,815 $665,870 ST. CROIX WI $346,250 $443,261 $535,815 $665,870 WASHINGTON WI $313,750 $401,630 $485,489 $603,370 WAUKESHA WI $313,750 $401,630 $485,489 $603,370 HAMPSHIRE WV $295,000 $377,663 $456,467 $567,283 JEFFERSON WV $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 SUBLETTE WY $312,500 $400,054 $483,587 $600,978 SWEETWATER WY $318,750 $408,043 $493,207 $612,989 TETON WY $679,891 $870,408 $1,052,120 $1,307,527 GUAM GU $612,500 $784,130 $947,826 $1,177,880 NORTHERN ISLANDS MP $570,000 $729,674 $882,011 $1,096,141 ROTA MP $446,250 $571,250 $690,543 $858,152 SAIPAN MP $575,000 $736,087 $889,783 $1,105,761 TINIAN MP $578,750 $740,924 $895,598 $1,112,989 AGUAS BUENAS PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 AIBONITO PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 BARCELONETA PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 BARRANQUITAS PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 BAYAMON PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 CAGUAS PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 CANOVANAS PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 CAROLINA PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 CATANO PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 CAYEY PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 CEIBA PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 CIALES PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 CIDRA PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 COMERIO PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 COROZAL PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 CULEBRA PR $307,500 $393,641 $475,815 $591,359 DORADO PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 FAJARDO PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 FLORIDA PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 GUAYNABO PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 GURABO PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 HUMACAO PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 JUNCOS PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 LAS PIEDRAS PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 LOIZA PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 LUQUILLO PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 MANATI PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 MAUNABO PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 MOROVIS PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 NAGUABO PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 NARANJITO PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 OROCOVIS PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 RIO GRANDE PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 SAN JUAN PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 SAN LORENZO PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 TOA ALTA PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 TOA BAJA PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 TRUJILLO ALTO PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 VEGA ALTA PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 VEGA BAJA PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 YABUCOA PR $418,750 $536,087 $647,989 $805,272 ST. CROIX ISLAND VI $356,250 $456,033 $551,250 $685,109 ST. JOHN ISLAND VI $677,500 $867,337 $1,048,370 $1,302,880 ST. THOMAS ISLAND VI $485,000 $620,870 $750,489 $932,717 ALL OTHER AREAS (floor): $294,620 $377,174 $455,897 $566,576 .02 The nationwide average purchase price (for use in the housing cost/income ratio for new and existing residences) is $245,500. SECTION 5. EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS Rev. Proc. 2013–28 is obsolete except as provided in section 6 of this revenue procedure. SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATES .01 Issuers may rely on this revenue procedure to determine average area purchase price safe harbors for commitments to provide financing or issue mortgage credit certificates that are made, or (if the purchase precedes the commitment) for residences that are purchased, in the period that begins on April 25, 2014, and ends on the date as of which the safe harbors contained in section 4.01 of this revenue procedure are rendered obsolete by a new revenue procedure. .02 Notwithstanding section 5 of this revenue procedure, issuers may continue to rely on the average area purchase price safe harbors contained in Rev. Proc. 2013–28, with respect to bonds sold, or for mortgage credit certificates issued with respect to bond authority exchanged, before May 25, 2014, if the commitments to provide financing or issue mortgage credit certificates are made on or before June 24, 2014. .03 Except as provided in section 6.04, issuers must use the nationwide average purchase price limitation contained in this revenue procedure for commitments to provide financing or issue mortgage credit certificates that are made, or (if the purchase precedes the commitment) for residences that are purchased, in the period that begins on April 25, 2014, and ends on the date when the nationwide average purchase price limitation is rendered obsolete by a new revenue procedure. .04 Notwithstanding sections 5 and 6.03 of this revenue procedure, issuers may continue to rely on the nationwide average purchase price set forth in Rev. Proc. 2013–28 with respect to bonds sold, or for mortgage credit certificates issued with respect to bond authority exchanged, before May 25, 2014, if the commitments to provide financing or issue mortgage credit certificates are made on or before June 24, 2014. SECTION 7. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT The collection of information contained in this revenue procedure has been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507) under control number 1545-1877. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. This revenue procedure contains a collection of information requirement in section 3.03. The purpose of the collection of information is to verify the applicable FHA loan limit that issuers of qualified mortgage bonds and qualified mortgage certificates have used to calculate the average area purchase price for a given metropolitan statistical area for purposes of section 143(e) and 25(c). The collection of information is required to obtain the benefit of using revisions to FHA loan limits to determine average area purchase prices. The likely respondents are state and local governments. The estimated total annual reporting and/or recordkeeping burden is: 15 hours. The estimated annual burden per respondent and/or recordkeeper: 15 minutes. The estimated number of respondents and/or recordkeepers: 60. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. SECTION 8. DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal authors of this revenue procedure are David White and James Polfer of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions & Products). For further information regarding this revenue procedure contact David E. White on (202) 317-4562 (not a toll free number). Part IV. Items of General Interest Announcement 2014–20 Announcement of Disciplinary Sanctions from the Office of Professional Responsibility The Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) announces recent disciplinary sanctions involving attorneys, certified public accountants, enrolled agents, enrolled actuaries, enrolled retirement plan agents, and appraisers. These individuals are subject to the regulations governing practice before the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), which are set out in Title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 10, and which are published in pamphlet form as Treasury Department Circular No. 230. The regulations prescribe the duties and restrictions relating to such practice and prescribe the disciplinary sanctions for violating the regulations. The disciplinary sanctions to be imposed for violation of the regulations are: Disbarred from practice before the IRS—An individual who is disbarred is not eligible to practice before the IRS as defined at 31 C.F.R. § 10.2(a)(4). Suspended from practice before the IRS—An individual who is suspended is not eligible to practice before the IRS as defined at 31 C.F.R. § 10.2(a)(4) during the term of the suspension. Censured in practice before the IRS—Censure is a public reprimand. Unlike disbarment or suspension, censure does not affect an individual’s eligibility to practice before the IRS, but OPR may subject the individual’s future practice rights to conditions designed to promote high standards of conduct. Monetary penalty—A monetary penalty may be imposed on an individual who engages in conduct subject to sanction or on an employer, firm, or entity if the individual was acting on its behalf and if it knew, or reasonably should have known, of the individual’s conduct. Disqualification of appraiser—An appraiser who is disqualified is barred from presenting evidence or testimony in any administrative proceeding before the Department of the Treasury or the IRS. Under the regulations, attorneys, certified public accountants, enrolled agents, enrolled actuaries, and enrolled retirement plan agents may not assist, or accept assistance from, individuals who are suspended or disbarred with respect to matters constituting practice (i.e., representation) before the IRS, and they may not aid or abet suspended or disbarred individuals to practice before the IRS. Disciplinary sanctions are described in these terms: Disbarred by decision, Suspended by decision, Censured by decision, Monetary penalty imposed, and Disqualified after hearing—An administrative law judge (ALJ) either 1) granted the government’s summary judgment motion or 2) conducted an evidentiary hearing upon OPR’s complaint alleging violation of the regulations; and 3) issued a decision imposing one of these sanctions. After 30 days from the issuance of the decision, in the absence of an appeal, the ALJ’s decision became the final agency decision. Disbarred by default decision, Suspended by default decision, Censured by default decision, Monetary penalty imposed by default decision, and Disqualified by default decision—An ALJ, after finding that no answer to OPR’s complaint had been filed, granted OPR’s motion for a default judgment and issued a decision imposing one of these sanctions. Disbarment by decision on appeal, Suspended by decision on appeal, Censured by decision on appeal, Monetary penalty imposed by decision on appeal, and Disqualified by decision on appeal—The decision of the ALJ was appealed to the agency appeal authority, acting as the delegate of the Secretary of the Treasury, and the appeal authority issued a decision imposing one of these sanctions. Disbarred by consent, Suspended by consent, Censured by consent, Monetary penalty imposed by consent, and Disqualified by consent—In lieu of a disciplinary proceeding being instituted or continued, an individual offered a consent to one of these sanctions and OPR accepted the offer. Typically, an offer of consent will provide for: suspension for an indefinite term; conditions that the individual must observe during the suspension; and the individual’s opportunity, after a stated number of months, to file with OPR a petition for reinstatement affirming compliance with the terms of the consent and affirming current eligibility to practice (i.e., an active professional license or active enrollment status). Suspended indefinitely by decision in expedited proceeding, Suspended indefinitely by default decision in expedited proceeding, Suspended by consent in expedited proceeding—OPR instituted an expedited proceeding for suspension (based on certain limited grounds, including loss of a professional license for cause, and criminal convictions). OPR has authority to disclose the grounds for disciplinary sanctions in these situations: (1) an ALJ or the Secretary’s delegate on appeal has issued a decision on or after September 26, 2007, which was the effective date of amendments to the regulations that permit making such decisions publicly available; (2) the individual has settled a disciplinary case by signing OPR’s “consent to sanction” form, which requires consenting individuals to admit to one or more violations of the regulations and to consent to the disclosure of the individual’s own return information related to the admitted violations (for example, failure to file Federal income tax returns); or (3) OPR has issued a decision in an expedited proceeding for indefinite suspension. Announcements of disciplinary sanctions appear in the Internal Revenue Bulletin at the earliest practicable date. The sanctions announced below are alphabetized first by the names of states and second by the last names of individuals. Unless otherwise indicated, section numbers (e.g., § 10.51) refer to the regulations. City & State Name Professional Designation Disciplinary Sanction Effective Date(s) California Sierra Madre Libman, Arnold CPA Reinstated to practice before the IRS, effective December 16, 2013 Florida Riverview Middleton, Tyree Unenrolled Return Preparer Suspended by consent (stipulated order in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida) Indefinite from December 10, 2013 Kentucky Lexington Milslagle, Mark J. CPA Suspended by default decision in expedited proceeding under 31 C.F.R. § 10.82 (convicted in Kentucky state court (KRS 516.030), forgery, 2nd degree) Indefinite from March 24, 2014 New Jersey Plainfield Armbrister, John Enrolled Agent Suspended by default decision in expedited proceeding under 31 C.F.R. § 10.82 (conviction under 26 U.S.C. § 7202, willful failure to collect/pay over tax) Indefinite from November 4, 2013 New York New York Cummins, Virgil M. Enrolled Agent Suspended by decision (failure to file Federal income tax returns for tax years 2009–2010, and failure to timely file a Federal income tax return for tax year 2011, (31 C.F.R. § 10.51(a)(6)), Indefinite from January 30, 2014 Highland Pezzo, John J. CPA Disbarred by decision of IRS Appellate Authority (failure to file Federal income tax return (Form 1040) for tax years 2008–2010; failure to file an S Corporation Federal income tax return (Form 1120S) for tax years 2007–2011; failure file Federal employment tax return (Form 940) for tax years 2008–2011; failure to file employer’s quarterly Federal tax return (Form 941) on behalf of his firm for ten quarters in tax years 2008–2011; failure to respond to requests from IRS (31 C.F.R. § 10.20(b)); and failure to use Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN) on returns and claims for refund during 2012 (31 C.F.R § 10.51(a)(17) Indefinite from January 17, 2014 Rye Brook Shapiro, Richard Attorney Reinstated to practice before the IRS, effective February 22, 2014 New Hartford Turynowicz, Steven CPA Suspended by decision in expedited proceeding under 31 C.F.R. § 10.82 (conviction under 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2), preparation and presentation of a false income tax return) Indefinite from December 16, 2013 Maryland Timonium Jacob, Felix CPA Suspended by default decision in expedited proceeding under 31 C.F.R. § 10.82 (conviction under 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2), aiding and assisting the preparation of a false income tax return, and 26 U.S.C. § 7203, failure to file individual tax return) Indefinite from January 6, 2014 Pennsylvania Huntingdon Valley Glick, Dennis CPA Suspended by default decision in expedited proceeding under 31 C.F.R. § 10.82 (conviction under 26 U.S.C. § 7212(a), corruptly endeavoring to obstruct and impede the due administration of the internal revenue laws, and 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2), aiding and abetting the preparation and filing of false tax returns) Indefinite from February 22, 2014 Virginia Warrenton Dibble, David Enrolled Agent Suspended by consent (willfully failing to make, or failing to file timely US individual income tax return, for tax years 2007–2010, and 2012; willfully evading or attempting to evade payments of Federal income taxes for tax years 2006–2012; willfully failing to file, or failing to file timely employer’s quarterly Federal employment tax returns for all quarters for tax years 2006, 2nd–4th quarters of tax year 2007, the 1st, 2nd and 4th quarters of 2008, and 1st–3rd quarters of tax year 2009; willfully failing to file, or failing to file timely, US income tax return for an S Corporation for tax years 2006–2009; willfully evading quarterly Federal employment and tax payments for 4th quarter of 2005, all quarters of 2006–2007, 1st, 2nd and 4th quarters of 2008, and 1st–3rd quarters of 2009; willfully evading payments of Federal unemployment taxes for tax years 2007–2009; and willfully evading assessment of Federal individual income taxes for tax years 2007–2010 (31 C.F.R. § 10.51(a)(6)); Practice rights indefinitely suspended for 48 months from February 6, 2014 (reinstatement with conditions); PTIN revocation indefinite from 04/24/14 Warrenton (continued) Dibble, David Enrolled Agent knowingly providing false and misleading information to the Department of the Treasury in connection with a pending matter, that is, OPR’s investigation of reports concerning his misconduct (31 C.F.R. § 10.51(a)(4)); and willfully preparing all or substantially all of, or signing the tax returns or claims for refund of others when his PTIN was not current for tax years 2011–2012 (31 C.F.R. § 10.51(a)(17)) Announcement 2014–21 Withholding of Tax on Certain U.S. Source Income Paid to Foreign Persons, Information Reporting and Backup Withholding on Payments Made to Certain U.S. Persons, and Portfolio Interest Treatment; Correction AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Correcting amendments. SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to final and temporary regulations (TD 9658), which were published in the Federal Register on Thursday, March 6, 2014 (79 FR 12726). The regulations relate to the withholding of tax on certain U.S. source income paid to foreign persons, information reporting and backup withholding with respect to payments made to certain U.S. persons, portfolio interest paid to nonresident alien individuals and foreign corporations, and the associated requirements governing collection, refunds, and credits of withheld amounts under these rules. DATES: This correction is effective on April 22, 2014 and is applicable on March 6, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy J. Lee, (202) 317-6942 (not a toll-free number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background This document contains amendments to the Income Tax Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under section 6045 of the Code. The temporary regulation that is the subject of these corrections is § 1.6045–1T, promulgated under section 6045 of the Internal Revenue Code. This regulation affects persons that are brokers making certain returns of information with respect to their customers. Need for Correction As published, the temporary regulation contains errors in the instructions that need to be corrected. First, the instructions indicate that § 1.6045–1T is amended. However, the temporary regulation is added, not amended. Second, the instructions do not add paragraphs (m) through (o), which should be included in the temporary regulation by cross-reference to the final regulation. The correcting amendments add the temporary regulation, including paragraphs (m) through (o). * * * * * Correction of Publication Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is corrected by making the following correcting amendments: PART 1—INCOME TAXES Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in part as follows: Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * * Par. 2. Section 1.6045–1T is added to read as follows: § 1.6045–1T Returns of information of brokers and barter exchanges (temporary). (a) through (c)(3)(i) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see § 1.6045–1(a) through (c)(3)(i)(C)(2)(iv). (ii) Excepted sales. No return of information is required with respect to a sale effected by a broker for a customer if the sale is an excepted sale. For this purpose, a sale is an excepted sale if it is— (A) So designated by the Internal Revenue Service in a revenue ruling or revenue procedure (see § 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter); or (B) A sale with respect to which a return is not required by applying the rules of § 1.6049–4(c)(4) (by substituting the term a sale subject to reporting under section 6045 for the term an interest payment). (iii) through (xiii) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see § 1.6045–1(c)(3)(iii) through (xiii). (xiv) Certain redemptions. No return of information is required under this section for payments made by a stock transfer agent (as described in § 1.6045–1(b)(iv)) with respect to a redemption of stock of a corporation described in section 1297(a) with respect to a shareholder in the corporation if— (A) The stock transfer agent obtains from the corporation a written certification signed by an officer of the corporation, that states that the corporation is described in section 1297(a) for each calendar year during which the stock transfer agent relies on the provisions of paragraph (c)(3)(xiv) of this section, and the stock transfer agent has no reason to know that the written certification is unreliable or incorrect; (B) The stock transfer agent identifies, prior to payment, the corporation as a participating FFI (including a reporting Model 2 FFI) (as defined in § 1.6049–4(f)(10) or (f)(14), respectively), or reporting Model 1 FFI (as defined in § 1.6049–4(f)(13)), in accordance with the requirements of § 1.1471–3(d)(4) (substituting the terms stock transfer agent and corporation for the terms withholding agent and payee); (C) The stock transfer agent obtains, before each year the payment would otherwise be reported, a written certification representing that the corporation shall report the payment as part of its account holder reporting obligations under chapter 4 of the Code or an applicable IGA (as defined in § 1.6049–4(f)(7)) and provided the stock transfer agent does not know that the corporation is not reporting the payment as required. A stock transfer agent that knows that the corporation is not reporting the payment as required under chapter 4 of the Code or an applicable IGA must report all payments reportable under this section that it makes during the year in which it obtains such knowledge; and (D) The stock transfer agent is not also acting in its capacity as a custodian, nominee, or other agent of the payee with respect to the payment. (xv) Effective/applicability date. Paragraphs (c)(3)(ii) and (xiv) of this section apply to sales effected on or after July 1, 2014. (For sales effected before July 1, 2014, see paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section as in effect and contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2013.) (c)(4) through (g)(1) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see § 1.6045–1(c)(4) through (g)(1). (i) With respect to a sale effected at an office of a broker either inside or outside the United States, the broker may treat the customer as an exempt foreign person if the broker can, prior to the payment, reliably associate the payment with documentation upon which it can rely in order to treat the customer as a foreign beneficial owner in accordance with § 1.1441–1(e)(1)(ii), as made to a foreign payee in accordance with § 1.6049–5(d)(1), or presumed to be made to a foreign payee under § 1.6049–5(d)(2) or (3). For purposes of this paragraph (g)(1)(i), the provisions in § 1.6049–5(c) regarding rules applicable to documentation of foreign status shall apply with respect to a sale when the broker completes the acts necessary to effect the sale at an office outside the United States, as described in paragraph (g)(3)(iii)(A) of this section, and no office of the same broker within the United States negotiated the sale with the customer or received instructions with respect to the sale from the customer. The provisions in § 1.6049–5(c) regarding the definitions of U.S. payor, U.S. middleman, non-U.S. payor, and non-U.S. middleman shall also apply for purposes of this paragraph (g)(1)(i). The provisions of § 1.1441–1 shall apply by substituting the terms broker and customer for the terms withholding agent and payee and without regard for the fact that the provisions apply to amounts subject to withholding under chapter 3 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). The provisions of § 1.6049–5(d) shall apply by substituting the terms broker and customer for the terms payor and payee. For purposes of this paragraph (g)(1)(i), a broker that is required to obtain, or chooses to obtain, a beneficial owner withholding certificate described in § 1.1441–1(e)(2)(i) from an individual may rely on the withholding certificate only to the extent the certificate includes a certification that the beneficial owner has not been, and at the time the certificate is furnished, reasonably expects not to be present in the United States for a period aggregating 183 days or more during each calendar year to which the certificate pertains. The certification is not required if a broker receives documentary evidence under § 1.6049–5(c)(1) or (4). (ii) through (3)(iii) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see § 1.6045–1(g)(1)(ii) through (g)(3)(iii). (iv) Special rules where the customer is a foreign intermediary or certain U.S. branches. A foreign intermediary, as defined in § 1.1441–1(c)(13), is an exempt foreign person, except when the broker has actual knowledge (within the meaning of § 1.6049–5(c)(3)) that the person for whom the intermediary acts is a U.S. person that is not exempt from reporting under paragraph (c)(3) of this section or the broker is required to presume under § 1.6049–5(d)(3) that the payee is a U.S. person that is not an exempt recipient. If a foreign intermediary, as described in § 1.1441–1(c)(13), or a U.S. branch that is not treated as a U.S. person receives a payment from a payor or middleman, which payment the payor or middleman can reliably associate with a valid withholding certificate described in § 1.1441–1(e)(3)(ii) or (iii) or § 1.1441–1(e)(3)(v), respectively, furnished by such intermediary or branch, then the intermediary or branch is not required to report such payment when it, in turn, pays the amount, unless, and to the extent, the intermediary or branch knows that the payment is required to be reported under this section and was not so reported. For example, if a U.S. branch described in § 1.1441–1(b)(2)(iv) fails to provide information regarding U.S. persons that are not exempt from reporting under paragraph (c)(3) of this section to the person from whom the U.S. branch receives the payment, the U.S. branch must report the payment on an information return. See, however, paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section for when reporting under section 6045 is coordinated with reporting under chapter 4 of the Code or an applicable IGA (as defined in § 1.6049–4(f)(7)). The exception of this paragraph (g)(3)(iv) for amounts paid by a foreign intermediary shall not apply to a qualified intermediary that assumes reporting responsibility under chapter 61 of the Code except as provided under the agreement described in § 1.1441–1(e)(5)(iii). (4) Examples. The application of the provisions of this paragraph (g) may be illustrated by the following examples: Example 1. FC is a foreign corporation that is not a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman described in § 1.6049–5(c)(5) that regularly issues and retires its own debt obligations. A is an individual whose residence address is inside the United States, who holds a bond issued by FC that is in registered form (within the meaning of section 163(f) and the regulations under that section). The bond is retired by FP, a foreign corporation that is a broker within the meaning of paragraph (a)(1) of this section and the designated paying agent of FC. FP mails the proceeds to A at A’s U.S. address. The sale would be considered to be effected at an office outside the United States under paragraph (g)(3)(iii)(A) of this section except that the proceeds of the sale are mailed to a U.S. address. For that reason, the sale is considered to be effected at an office of the broker inside the United States under paragraph (g)(3)(iii)(B) of this section. Therefore, FC is a broker under paragraph (a)(1) of this section with respect to this transaction because, although it is not a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman, as described in § 1.6049–5(c)(5), it is deemed to effect the sale in the United States. FP is a broker for the same reasons. However, under the multiple broker exception under paragraph (c)(3)(iii) of this section, FP, rather than FC, is required to report the payment because FP is responsible for paying the holder the proceeds from the retired obligations. Under paragraph (g)(1)(i) of this section, FP may not treat A as an exempt foreign person and must make an information return under section 6045 with respect to the retirement of the FC bond, unless FP obtains the certificate or documentation described in paragraph (g)(1)(i) of this section. Example 2. The facts are the same as in Example 1 except that FP mails the proceeds to A at an address outside the United States. Under paragraph (g)(3)(iii)(A) of this section, the sale is considered to be effected at an office of the broker outside the United States. Therefore, under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, neither FC nor FP is a broker with respect to the retirement of the FC bond. Accordingly, neither is required to make an information return under section 6045. Example 3. The facts are the same as in Example 2 except that FP is also the agent of A. The result is the same as in Example 2. Neither FP nor FC are brokers under paragraph (a)(1) of this section with respect to the sale since the sale is effected outside the United States and neither of them are U.S. payors (within the meaning of § 1.6049–5(c)(5)). Example 4. The facts are the same as in Example 1 except that the registered bond held by A was issued by DC, a domestic corporation that regularly issues and retires its own debt obligations. Also, FP mails the proceeds to A at an address outside the United States. Interest on the bond is not described in paragraph (g)(1)(ii) of this section. The sale is considered to be effected at an office outside the United States under paragraph (g)(3)(iii)(A) of this section. DC is a broker under paragraph (a)(1)(i)(B) of this section. DC is not required to report the payment under the multiple broker exception under paragraph (c)(3)(iii) of this section. FP is not required to make an information return under section 6045 because FP is not a U.S. payor described in § 1.6049–5(c)(5) and the sale is effected outside the United States. Accordingly, FP is not a broker under paragraph (a)(1) of this section. Example 5. The facts are the same as in Example 4 except that FP is also the agent of A. DC is a broker under paragraph (a)(1) of this section. DC is not required to report under the multiple broker exception under paragraph (c)(3)(iii) of this section. FP is not required to make an information return under section 6045 because FP is not a U.S. payor described in § 1.6049–5(c)(5) and the sale is effected outside the United States and therefore FP is not a broker under paragraph (a)(1) of this section. Example 6. The facts are the same as in Example 4 except that the bond is retired by DP, a broker within the meaning of paragraph (a)(1) of this section and the designated paying agent of DC. DP is a U.S. payor under § 1.6049–5(c)(5). DC is not required to report under the multiple broker exception under paragraph (c)(3)(iii) of this section. DP is required to make an information return under section 6045 because it is the person responsible for paying the proceeds from the retired obligations unless DP obtains the certificate or documentary evidence described in paragraph (g)(1)(i) of this section. Example 7. Customer A owns U.S. corporate bonds issued in registered form after July 18, 1984, and carrying a stated rate of interest. The bonds are held through an account with foreign bank, X, and are held in street name. X is a wholly-owned subsidiary of a U.S. company and is not a qualified intermediary within the meaning of § 1.1441–1(e)(5)(ii). X has no documentation regarding A. A instructs X to sell the bonds. In order to effect the sale, X acts through its agent in the United States, Y. Y sells the bonds and remits the sales proceeds to X. X credits A’s account in the foreign country. X does not provide documentation to Y and has no actual knowledge that A is a foreign person but it does appear that A is an entity (rather than an individual). (i) Y’s obligations to withhold and report. Y treats X as the customer, and not A, because Y cannot treat X as an intermediary because it has received no documentation from X. Y is not required to report the sales proceeds under the multiple broker exception under paragraph (c)(3)(iii) of this section, because X is an exempt recipient. Further, Y is not required to report the amount of accrued interest paid to X on Form 1042-S under § 1.1461–1(c)(2)(ii) because accrued interest is not an amount subject to reporting under chapter 3 unless the withholding agent knows that the obligation is being sold with a primary purpose of avoiding tax. (ii) X’s obligations to withhold and report. Although X has effected, within the meaning of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the sale of a security at an office outside the United States under paragraph (g)(3)(iii) of this section, X is treated as a broker, under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, because as a wholly-owned subsidiary of a U.S. corporation, X is a controlled foreign corporation and therefore is a U.S. payor. See § 1.6049–5(c)(5). Under the presumptions described in § 1.6049–5(d)(2) (as applied to amounts not subject to withholding under chapter 3), X must apply the presumption rules of § 1.1441–1(b)(3)(i) through (iii), with respect to the sales proceeds, to treat A as a partnership that is a U.S. non-exempt recipient because the presumption of foreign status for offshore obligations under § 1.1441–1(b)(3)(iii)(D) does not apply. See paragraph (g)(1)(i) of this section. Therefore, unless X is an FFI (as defined in § 1.1471–1(b)(47)) that is excepted from reporting the sales proceeds under paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section, the payment of proceeds to A by X is reportable on a Form 1099 under paragraph (c)(2) of this section. X has no obligation to backup withhold on the payment based on the exemption under § 31.3406(g)–1(e) of this chapter, unless X has actual knowledge that A is a U.S. person that is not an exempt recipient. X is also required to separately report the accrued interest (see paragraph (d)(3) of this section) on Form 1099 under section 6049 because A is also presumed to be a U.S. person who is not an exempt recipient with respect to the payment because accrued interest is not an amount subject to withholding under chapter 3 and, therefore, the presumption of foreign status for offshore obligations under § 1.1441–1(b)(3)(iii)(D) does not apply. See § 1.6049–5(d)(2)(i). Example 8. The facts are the same as in Example 7, except that X is a foreign corporation that is not a U.S. payor under § 1.6049–5(c). (i) Y’s obligations to withhold and report. Y is not required to report the sales proceeds under the multiple broker exception under paragraph (c)(3)(iii) of this section, because X is the person responsible for paying the proceeds from the sale to A. (ii) X’s obligations to withhold and report. Although A is presumed to be a U.S. payee under the presumptions of § 1.6049–5(d)(2), X is not considered to be a broker under paragraph (a)(1) of this section because it is a not a U.S. payor under § 1.6049–5(c)(5). Therefore X is not required to report the sale under paragraph (c)(2) of this section. (5) Effective/applicability date—(i) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see § 1.6045–1(g)(5)(i). (ii) The provisions of paragraphs (g)(1)(i), (g)(3)(iv), and (g)(4) of this section apply to payments made on or after July 1, 2014. (h) through (p) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see § 1.6045–1(h) through (p). (q) Expiration date. The applicability of this section expires on February 28, 2017. Martin V. Franks, Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration). Note (Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on April 21, 2014, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal Register for April 22, 2014, 79 F.R. 22378) Definition of Terms and Abbreviations Definition of Terms Revenue rulings and revenue procedures (hereinafter referred to as “rulings”) that have an effect on previous rulings use the following defined terms to describe the effect: Amplified describes a situation where no change is being made in a prior published position, but the prior position is being extended to apply to a variation of the fact situation set forth therein. Thus, if an earlier ruling held that a principle applied to A, and the new ruling holds that the same principle also applies to B, the earlier ruling is amplified. (Compare with modified, below). Clarified is used in those instances where the language in a prior ruling is being made clear because the language has caused, or may cause, some confusion. It is not used where a position in a prior ruling is being changed. Distinguished describes a situation where a ruling mentions a previously published ruling and points out an essential difference between them. Modified is used where the substance of a previously published position is being changed. Thus, if a prior ruling held that a principle applied to A but not to B, and the new ruling holds that it applies to both A and B, the prior ruling is modified because it corrects a published position. (Compare with amplified and clarified, above). Obsoleted describes a previously published ruling that is not considered determinative with respect to future transactions. This term is most commonly used in a ruling that lists previously published rulings that are obsoleted because of changes in laws or regulations. A ruling may also be obsoleted because the substance has been included in regulations subsequently adopted. Revoked describes situations where the position in the previously published ruling is not correct and the correct position is being stated in a new ruling. Superseded describes a situation where the new ruling does nothing more than restate the substance and situation of a previously published ruling (or rulings). Thus, the term is used to republish under the 1986 Code and regulations the same position published under the 1939 Code and regulations. The term is also used when it is desired to republish in a single ruling a series of situations, names, etc., that were previously published over a period of time in separate rulings. If the new ruling does more than restate the substance of a prior ruling, a combination of terms is used. For example, modified and superseded describes a situation where the substance of a previously published ruling is being changed in part and is continued without change in part and it is desired to restate the valid portion of the previously published ruling in a new ruling that is self contained. In this case, the previously published ruling is first modified and then, as modified, is superseded. Supplemented is used in situations in which a list, such as a list of the names of countries, is published in a ruling and that list is expanded by adding further names in subsequent rulings. After the original ruling has been supplemented several times, a new ruling may be published that includes the list in the original ruling and the additions, and supersedes all prior rulings in the series. Suspended is used in rare situations to show that the previous published rulings will not be applied pending some future action such as the issuance of new or amended regulations, the outcome of cases in litigation, or the outcome of a Service study. Abbreviations The following abbreviations in current use and formerly used will appear in material published in the Bulletin. A—Individual. Acq.—Acquiescence. B—Individual. BE—Beneficiary. BK—Bank. B.T.A.—Board of Tax Appeals. C—Individual. C.B.—Cumulative Bulletin. CFR—Code of Federal Regulations. CI—City. COOP—Cooperative. Ct.D.—Court Decision. CY—County. D—Decedent. DC—Dummy Corporation. DE—Donee. Del. Order—Delegation Order. DISC—Domestic International Sales Corporation. DR—Donor. E—Estate. EE—Employee. E.O.—Executive Order. ER—Employer. ERISA—Employee Retirement Income Security Act. EX—Executor. F—Fiduciary. FC—Foreign Country. FICA—Federal Insurance Contributions Act. FISC—Foreign International Sales Company. FPH—Foreign Personal Holding Company. F.R.—Federal Register. FUTA—Federal Unemployment Tax Act. FX—Foreign corporation. G.C.M.—Chief Counsel’s Memorandum. GE—Grantee. GP—General Partner. GR—Grantor. IC—Insurance Company. I.R.B.—Internal Revenue Bulletin. LE—Lessee. LP—Limited Partner. LR—Lessor. M—Minor. Nonacq.—Nonacquiescence. O—Organization. P—Parent Corporation. PHC—Personal Holding Company. PO—Possession of the U.S. PR—Partner. PRS—Partnership. PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption. Pub. L.—Public Law. REIT—Real Estate Investment Trust. Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure. Rev. Rul.—Revenue Ruling. S—Subsidiary. S.P.R.—Statement of Procedural Rules. Stat.—Statutes at Large. T—Target Corporation. T.C.—Tax Court. T.D.—Treasury Decision. TFE—Transferee. TFR—Transferor. T.I.R.—Technical Information Release. TP—Taxpayer. TR—Trust. TT—Trustee. U.S.C.—United States Code. X—Corporation. Y—Corporation. Z—Corporation. Numerical Finding List Numerical Finding List A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenue procedures, Treasury decisions, etc., published in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2013–27 through 2013–52 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2013–52, dated December 23, 2013. Bulletins 2014–1 through 2014–20 Announcements Article Issue Link Page 2014-1 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 393 2014-2 2014-04 I.R.B. 2014-04 448 2014-4 2014-07 I.R.B. 2014-07 523 2014-05 2014-06 I.R.B. 2014-06 507 2014-06 2014-06 I.R.B. 2014-06 508 2014-07 2014-06 I.R.B. 2014-06 508 2014-08 2014-06 I.R.B. 2014-06 508 2014-09 2014-06 I.R.B. 2014-06 508 2014-10 2014-06 I.R.B. 2014-06 508 2014-11 2014-06 I.R.B. 2014-06 508 2014-12 2014-06 I.R.B. 2014-06 509 2014-13 2014-10 I.R.B. 2014-10 620 2014-14 2014-16 I.R.B. 2014-16 948 2014-15 2014-16 I.R.B. 2014-16 973 2014-16 2014-17 I.R.B. 2014-17 983 2014-17 2014-18 I.R.B. 2014-18 1007 2014-18 2014-17 I.R.B. 2014-17 983 2014-19 2014-17 I.R.B. 2014-17 984 2014-20 2014-20 I.R.B. 2014-20 1027 2014-21 2014-20 I.R.B. 2014-20 1030 Notices Article Issue Link Page 2014-1 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 270 2014-2 2014-03 I.R.B. 2014-03 407 2014-3 2014-03 I.R.B. 2014-03 408 2014-4 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 274 2014-5 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 276 2014-6 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 279 2014-7 2014-04 I.R.B. 2014-04 445 2014-8 2014-05 I.R.B. 2014-05 452 2014-9 2014-05 I.R.B. 2014-05 455 2014-10 2014-09 I.R.B. 2014-09 605 2014-11 2014-13 I.R.B. 2014-13 880 2014-12 2014-09 I.R.B. 2014-09 606 2014-13 2014-10 I.R.B. 2014-10 616 2014-14 2014-13 I.R.B. 2014-13 881 2014-15 2014-12 I.R.B. 2014-12 661 2014-16 2014-14 I.R.B. 2014-14 920 2014-17 2014-13 I.R.B. 2014-13 881 2014-18 2014-15 I.R.B. 2014-15 926 2014-19 2014-17 I.R.B. 2014-17 979 2014-20 2014-16 I.R.B. 2014-16 937 2014-21 2014-16 I.R.B. 2014-16 938 2014-22 2014-16 I.R.B. 2014-16 940 2014-23 2014-16 I.R.B. 2014-16 942 2014-24 2014-16 I.R.B. 2014-16 942 2014-25 2014-17 I.R.B. 2014-17 981 2014-27 2014-18 I.R.B. 2014-18 987 2014-28 2014-18 I.R.B. 2014-18 990 2014-29 2014-18 I.R.B. 2014-18 991 2014-31 2014-20 I.R.B. 2014-20 1006 2014-32 2014-20 I.R.B. 2014-20 1006 Proposed Regulations Article Issue Link Page REG-154890-03 2014-06 I.R.B. 2014-06 504 REG-159420-04 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 374 REG-144468-05 2014-06 I.R.B. 2014-06 474 REG-163195-05 2014-15 I.R.B. 2014-15 930 REG-119305-11 2014-08 I.R.B. 2014-08 524 REG-140974-11 2014-03 I.R.B. 2014-03 438 REG-121534-12 2014-06 I.R.B. 2014-06 473 REG-122706-12 2014-11 I.R.B. 2014-11 647 REG-134361-12 2014-13 I.R.B. 2014-13 895 REG-136984-12 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 378 REG-113350-13 2014-03 I.R.B. 2014-03 440 REG-130967-13 2014-13 I.R.B. 2014-13 884 REG-141036-13 2014-07 I.R.B. 2014-07 516 REG-143172-13 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 383 REG-108641-14 2014-15 I.R.B. 2014-15 928 Revenue Procedures Article Issue Link Page 2014-1 2014-01 I.R.B. 2014-01 1 2014-2 2014-01 I.R.B. 2014-01 90 2014-3 2014-01 I.R.B. 2014-01 111 2014-4 2014-01 I.R.B. 2014-01 125 2014-5 2014-01 I.R.B. 2014-01 169 2014-6 2014-01 I.R.B. 2014-01 198 2014-7 2014-01 I.R.B. 2014-01 238 2014-8 2014-01 I.R.B. 2014-01 242 2014-9 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 281 2014-10 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 293 2014-11 2014-03 I.R.B. 2014-03 411 2014-12 2014-03 I.R.B. 2014-03 415 2014-13 2014-03 I.R.B. 2014-03 419 2014-14 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 295 2014-15 2014-05 I.R.B. 2014-05 456 2014-16 2014-09 I.R.B. 2014-09 606 2014-17 2014-12 I.R.B. 2014-12 661 2014-18 2014-07 I.R.B. 2014-07 513 2014-19 2014-10 I.R.B. 2014-10 619 2014-20 2014-09 I.R.B. 2014-09 614 2014-21 2014-11 I.R.B. 2014-11 641 2014-22 2014-11 I.R.B. 2014-11 646 2014-23 2014-12 I.R.B. 2014-12 685 2014-24 2014-13 I.R.B. 2014-13 879 2014-25 2014-15 I.R.B. 2014-15 927 2014-28 2014-16 I.R.B. 2014-16 944 2014-30 2014-20 I.R.B. 2014-20 1009 2014-31 2014-20 I.R.B. 2014-20 1009 Revenue Rulings Article Issue Link Page 2014-1 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 263 2014-2 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 255 2014-3 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 259 2014-4 2014-05 I.R.B. 2014-05 449 2014-6 2014-07 I.R.B. 2014-07 510 2014-8 2014-11 I.R.B. 2014-11 624 2014-9 2014-17 I.R.B. 2014-17 975 2014-10 2014-14 I.R.B. 2014-14 906 2014-11 2014-14 I.R.B. 2014-14 906 2014-12 2014-15 I.R.B. 2014-15 923 2014-13 2014-19 I.R.B. 2014-19 1003 Treasury Decisions Article Issue Link Page 9649 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 265 9650 2014-03 I.R.B. 2014-03 394 9651 2014-04 I.R.B. 2014-04 441 9652 2014-12 I.R.B. 2014-12 655 9653 2014-06 I.R.B. 2014-06 460 9654 2014-06 I.R.B. 2014-06 461 9655 2014-09 I.R.B. 2014-09 541 9656 2014-11 I.R.B. 2014-11 626 9657 2014-13 I.R.B. 2014-13 687 9658 2014-13 I.R.B. 2014-13 748 9659 2014-12 I.R.B. 2014-12 653 9660 2014-13 I.R.B. 2014-13 842 9661 2014-13 I.R.B. 2014-13 855 9662 2014-16 I.R.B. 2014-16 933 Effect of Current Actions on Previously Published Items Finding List of Current Actions on Previously Published Items A cumulative list of current actions on previously published items in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2013–27 through 2013–52 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2013–52, dated December 23, 2013. Bulletins 2014–1 through 2014–20 Announcements Old Article Action New Article Issue Link Page 2007-44 Modified by Ann. 2014-4 2014-07 I.R.B. 2014-07 523 2011-49 Modified by Ann. 2014-4 2014-07 I.R.B. 2014-07 523 Notices Old Article Action New Article Issue Link Page 2003-37 Obsoleted by REG-163195-05 2014-15 I.R.B. 2014-15 930 2006-87, 2006-2 C.B. 766 Superseded by Notice 2014-29 2014-18 I.R.B. 2014-18 991 2006-109 Modified by Notice 2014-4 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 274 2007-25, 2007-1 C.B. 760 Superseded by Notice 2014-29 2014-18 I.R.B. 2014-18 991 2007-59 Obsoleted by REG-163195-05 2014-15 I.R.B. 2014-15 930 2007-77, 2007-2 C.B. 735 Superseded by Notice 2014-29 2014-18 I.R.B. 2014-18 991 2008-107, 2008-2 C.B. 1266 Superseded by Notice 2014-29 2014-18 I.R.B. 2014-18 991 2009-78 Superseded by T.D. 9654 2014-06 I.R.B. 2014-06 461 2010-27, 2010-1 C.B. 531 Superseded by Notice 2014-29 2014-18 I.R.B. 2014-18 991 2013-1 Superseded by Notice 2014-22 2014-16 I.R.B. 2014-16 940 2013-1 Modified by Notice 2014-22 2014-16 I.R.B. 2014-16 940 2013-13 Obsoleted by REG-163195-05 2014-15 I.R.B. 2014-15 930 2013-17 Amplified by Notice 2014-1 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 270 Revenue Procedures Old Article Action New Article Issue Link Page 2003-49 Modified and superseded by Rev. Proc. 2014-14 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 295 2004-42 Obsoleted by REG-163195-05 2014-15 I.R.B. 2014-15 930 2004-43 Obsoleted by REG-163195-05 2014-15 I.R.B. 2014-15 930 2011-4 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2014-17 2014-12 I.R.B. 2014-12 661 2011-14 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2014-16 2014-09 I.R.B. 2014-09 606 2011-14 Clarified by Rev. Proc. 2014-16 2014-09 I.R.B. 2014-09 606 2011-14 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2014-17 2014-12 I.R.B. 2014-12 661 2011-44 Modified and Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2014-11 2014-03 I.R.B. 2014-03 411 2011-49 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2014-6 2014-01 I.R.B. 2014-01 198 2012-14 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2014-17 2014-12 I.R.B. 2014-12 661 2012-19 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2014-16 2014-09 I.R.B. 2014-09 606 2012-19 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2014-16 2014-09 I.R.B. 2014-09 606 2012-20 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2014-17 2014-12 I.R.B. 2014-12 661 2012-20 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2014-17 2014-12 I.R.B. 2014-12 661 2013-1 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2014-1 2014-01 I.R.B. 2014-01 1 2013-2 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2014-2 2014-01 I.R.B. 2014-01 90 2013-3 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2014-3 2014-01 I.R.B. 2014-01 111 2013-4 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2014-4 2014-01 I.R.B. 2014-01 125 2013-5 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2014-5 2014-01 I.R.B. 2014-01 169 2013-6 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2014-6 2014-01 I.R.B. 2014-01 198 2013-7 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2014-7 2014-01 I.R.B. 2014-01 238 2013-8 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2014-8 2014-01 I.R.B. 2014-01 242 2013-9 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2014-9 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 281 2013-10 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2014-10 2014-02 I.R.B. 2014-02 293 2013-22 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2014-28 2014-16 I.R.B. 2014-16 944 2013-24 Obsoleted by Rev. Proc. 2014-23 2014-12 I.R.B. 2014-12 685 2013-27 Obsoleted by Rev. Proc. 2014-23 2014-12 I.R.B. 2014-12 685 2013-28 Obsoleted by Rev. Proc. 2014-31 2014-20 I.R.B. 2014-20 1009 2013-32 Superseded in part by Rev. Proc. 2014-1, and 2014-01 I.R.B. 2014-01 1 Rev. Proc. 2014-3 2014-01 I.R.B. 2014-01 111 2014-1 Amplified by Rev. Proc. 2014-18 2014-07 I.R.B. 2014-07 513 2014-1 I.R.B. 111 Amplified by Rev. Proc. 2014-24 2014-13 I.R.B. 2014-13 879 2014-3 Amplified by Rev. Proc. 2014-18 2014-07 I.R.B. 2014-07 513 2014-3 I.R.B 111 Amplified by Rev. Proc. 2014-24 2014-13 I.R.B. 2014-13 879 2014-4 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2014-19 2014-10 I.R.B. 2014-10 619 Proposed Regulations Old Article Action New Article Issue Link Page 209054-87 A portion withdrawn by REG-113350-13 2014-03 I.R.B. 2014-03 440 Revenue Rulings Old Article Action New Article Issue Link Page 2005-48 (2005-2 CB 259) Obsoleted by T.D. 9659 2014-12 I.R.B. 2014-12 653 2013-17 Amplified by Notice 2014-19 2014-17 I.R.B. 2014-17 979 2013-17 Amplified by Notice 2014-25 2014-17 I.R.B. 2014-17 981 Treasury Decision Old Article Action New Article Issue Link Page 9644 Correction by Ann. 2014-18 2014-17 I.R.B. 2014-17 983 9644 Correction by Ann. 2014-19 2014-17 I.R.B. 2014-17 984 INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETIN The Introduction at the beginning of this issue describes the purpose and content of this publication. The weekly Internal Revenue Bulletins are available at www.irs.gov/irb/. CUMULATIVE BULLETINS The contents of the weekly Bulletins were consolidated semiannually into permanent, indexed, Cumulative Bulletins through the 2008–2 edition. INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETINS ON CD-ROM Internal Revenue Bulletins are available annually as part of Publication 1796 (Tax Products CD-ROM). The CD-ROM can be purchased from National Technical Information Service (NTIS) on the Internet at www.irs.gov/cdorders (discount for online orders) or by calling 1-877-233-6767. The first release is available in mid-December and the final release is available in late January. We Welcome Comments About the Internal Revenue Bulletin If you have comments concerning the format or production of the Internal Revenue Bulletin or suggestions for improving it, we would be pleased to hear from you. You can email us your suggestions or comments through the IRS Internet Home Page (www.irs.gov) or write to the IRS Bulletin Unit, SE:W:CAR:MP:P:SPA, Washington, DC 20224.