This IRM provides general technical and procedural guidance on relief from joint and several liability and relief from application of community property laws, also known as innocent spouse relief.

Married taxpayers may elect to file joint returns with their spouse per IRC 6013. This means that both taxpayers who file joint returns with each other:

Taxpayers filing joint returns may be relieved of income tax liability, plus related penalties and interest, under certain conditions as set forth in IRC 6015, the relief provisions enacted in RRA 98.

Married taxpayers filing separate returns in community property states may also be relieved of income tax liability under certain circumstances per IRC 66. See IRM 25.15.5, Relief from Community Property Laws for more information.

The information in this section is based upon the following authorities:

The Director, Examination - Field and Campus Policy, who is under the Director, Headquarters Examination, is responsible for the delivery of policy and guidance that impacts the field and campus examination process. See IRM 1.1.16.5.5.1, Examination Field and Campus Policy, for additional information.

Campus Exam and Field Support, which is under the Director, Examination - Field and Campus Policy, is the group responsible for providing the Servicewide policy guidance on compliance processes that relate to campus examination operations and support Field Exam and Specialty Programs in SB/SE and Large Business & International (LB&I). See IRM 1.1.16.5.5.1.5, Campus Exam and Field Support, for additional information.

The Director of Examination, Field and Campus Policy is the executive responsible for the Innocent Spouse Program (ISP) by providing policy, procedural guidance and oversight to innocent spouse processing IRMs.

Requests for innocent spouse relief are considered by Area Office examiners during open field examinations, and by Cincinnati Centralized Innocent Spouse Operation (CCISO) otherwise. Field Examination General Processes, under the Director, Examination - Field and Campus Policy is the group responsible for providing policy and procedural guidance on standard examination processes to field employees. CCISO falls under the responsibility of the Director, Examination - Campus, with the Director, Examination - Field and Campus Policy providing oversight to the campus innocent spouse processing IRMs.

Employees with taxpayer contact may have to address an innocent spouse relief issue raised by the taxpayer. Any employee or business unit that receives a Form 8857, Request for Innocent Spouse Relief, or written statement containing the same information required on Form 8857, which is signed under penalties of perjury, is responsible for timely and properly routing the form according to instructions in this IRM.

Taxpayer Bill of Rights: The Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TBOR) was codified as IRC 7803(a)(3). Under this new code subsection, the Commissioner must ensure employees are responsible for being familiar with and acting in accordance with taxpayer rights. For additional information refer to Policy 1-236 at IRM 1.2.1.2.36, Policy Statement 1-236, Fairness and Integrity in Enforcement Selection, and the TBOR at irs.gov-Taxpayer Bill of Rights.

Management officials in the Area Offices and Campuses oversee the employees who may receive such requests, and must ensure the timely and proper routing of innocent spouse relief requests per instructions in this IRM.

Innocent spouse claim - A request for innocent spouse relief filed on Form 8857, Request for Innocent Spouse Relief, or a written statement containing the same information required on the Form 8857, which is signed under penalties of perjury.

Requesting Spouse or RS - the spouse making the request for relief.

Non-Requesting Spouse or NRS - the spouse not making the request for relief.

The following table lists commonly used acronyms used throughout this IRM and their descriptions:

Other IRM chapters provide information on single topics that pertain to more than one function. Compliance employees are responsible for researching and utilizing information contained in all reference materials. The following is a list of IRM chapters pertaining to Examination programs (not all inclusive):

Additional information regarding procedural and technical aspects of the Innocent Spouse Program is available at http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/examination/tip/innocentspouse/default.aspx, and throughout IRM 25.15, Relief from Joint and Several Liability.

Taxpayers filing joint returns may be relieved of income tax liability under certain conditions. Married taxpayers filing separate returns in community property states may also be relieved of income tax liability under certain circumstances. See IRM 25.15.5, Relief from Community Property Laws, for explanations on community property laws.

If the income tax liability is relieved under IRC 6015, related penalties and interest are relieved.

The expanded relief provisions contained in this IRM should not be confused with other provisions which may also provide relief to joint filers, such as relief available to an injured spouse. IRM 25.15.1.2.5, Injured Spouse Claims.

If a spouse claims he or she signed the joint tax return under duress or was coerced into signing it, the election to file a joint return may be invalid. In that case, the issue of relief from joint and several liability is not applicable. However, the Cincinnati Centralized Innocent Spouse Operation (CCISO) should work the duress issue along with the Form 8857, Request for Innocent Spouse Relief. If only one spouse signs the return, see IRM 25.15.1.2.9, Joint Assessment/One Signature. To establish a return was signed under duress, the taxpayer must demonstrate:

A signature made involuntarily or under duress is not a valid signature. Therefore, the election to file a joint return is not valid.

The individual claiming duress is not jointly or severally liable for liabilities arising from such a return if the return was indeed signed under duress.

The account should be adjusted to reflect a married filing separate return being filed by both spouses.

A married filing separate tax return may need to be secured from the spouse claiming to have signed under duress if a return is required for the period or if the taxpayer may have been entitled to a refund.

A requesting spouse (RS) who raises the issue of duress and later determines he or she would owe more tax if he or she filed separately, may choose not to pursue the issue of duress.

The determination of whether or not an income tax return was jointly filed presents a question of fact. The resolution of the factual issue should focus on the intention of the parties or taxpayers for the return in question. For a discussion of the factors to consider when making the determination, see United States v. Kramer, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15951, 1983 WL 1628, 52 A.F.T.R.2d 83 5630, (D. Md.1983) and the cases cited therein.

When a spouse establishes his or her signature on a joint return was forged and there was no tacit (implied) consent to jointly file the return, the joint election is invalid. Again, the relief from joint and several liability provisions do not apply. See IRM 25.15.19.2.4.1, Tacit Consent Factors, for more information.

The individual claiming his or her signature was forged is not jointly or severally liable for liabilities arising from such a return if the signature was indeed forged. However, CCISO should work the forged signature issue, along with the Form 8857, Request for Innocent Spouse Relief.

The account should be adjusted to reflect a married filing separate return being filed by both spouses.

A married filing separate tax return may need to be secured from the spouse claiming forgery if a return is required for the period, or if the taxpayer may have been entitled to a refund.

A RS who raises the issue of forgery and later determines he or she would owe more tax if he or she filed separately, may choose not to pursue the issue of forgery.

In situations where the spouse claiming forgery failed to file despite having a filing requirement, the circumstances surrounding the alleged forgery should be investigated. An interview with the other spouse should be considered when developing the tacit consent issue.

Consider referring the individual who forged the signature and any other individual associated with the forgery to the Criminal Investigation Division.

IRC 6402(a) permits the IRS to apply a taxpayer’s overpayment to any outstanding federal tax. IRC 6402(c), (d), (e) and (f) require the IRS to apply a taxpayer's overpayment to any outstanding past-due child support, federal agency debt, past-due state income tax obligation, or state unemployment compensation debt, prior to crediting the overpayment to a future tax or making a refund. This application of a tax overpayment is called a refund offset.

A spouse may file an injured spouse claim on Form 8379, Injured Spouse Allocation, to recover part or all of a joint refund transferred to pay the separate liabilities of the other spouse.

Where a taxpayer is making an injured spouse claim but mistakenly uses Form 8857, Request for Innocent Spouse Relief, advise the taxpayer of the difference.

Refer to IRM 21.4.6, Refund Offset, for additional information on injured spouse procedures and the refund offset program.

IRC 6663(c) provides that in the case of a joint return, the imposition of the fraud penalty shall not apply to a spouse, unless some part of the underpayment is due to the fraud of such spouse.

Where the fraud penalty is assessed against a spouse without appropriate development and explanation, that spouse should be relieved of such assessment pursuant to IRC 6663(c) and not IRC 6015.IRC 6015 does not provide for relief from penalties and interest separate from tax. See IRM 4.8.11.9.3.5, Documentation of Culpable Spouse, for more information.

A taxpayer may file an offer to compromise his or her outstanding tax liability for a lesser amount where the taxpayer’s assets and income are insufficient to pay the full amount, where there is doubt as to the taxpayer’s liability, or where, due to exceptional circumstances, requiring full payment of the tax would cause an economic hardship or be unfair.

An accepted OIC will conclusively settle the taxpayer's liability specified in the offer. See Treas. Reg. 301.7122–1(e)(5). Once an OIC is accepted, the taxpayer may not contest the amount of the liability. Therefore, a taxpayer with an accepted OIC cannot file a claim for relief from any liability covered by the OIC. This is true even if the taxpayer later defaults on the accepted OIC.

If a spouse requesting relief from joint and several liability was not a party to the other spouse’s accepted offer in compromise, then that spouse may file a claim for relief from liability.

If there is a pending OIC (Integrated Data Retrieval System (IDRS) transaction code (TC) 480), for the taxpayer who also filed the innocent spouse claim, advise the taxpayer of the consequences if the OIC is accepted. For example, the acceptance of an OIC precludes the taxpayer from subsequently being considered for relief from joint and several liability for the same tax period.

If relief from joint and several liability is the only issue present in an OIC (i.e., the taxpayer submits a doubt as to the liability offer), suggest the taxpayer withdraw the offer and file Form 8857, Request for Innocent Spouse Relief. See IRM 25.15.7.4.4, Offer in Compromise (OIC), for more information. The taxpayer may submit another OIC if relief is not granted through the innocent spouse provisions.

Generally, a RS is not entitled to relief for any liability determined by a closing agreement entered into by the RS. An exception to this rule is a settlement agreement under IRC 6224(c) entered into while the RS was a party to a pending TEFRA partnership proceeding with respect to partnership items, or penalties, additions to tax, additional amounts and interest related to adjustments to partnership items under the unified partnership audit and litigation procedures for IRC 6221 through IRC 6234 TEFRA. See Treas. Reg. 1.6015–1(c)(2).

This exception does not apply to:

A deficiency assessed on a joint account based on the signature of only one spouse on a waiver of assessment is generally not a valid assessment with respect to the non-signing spouse. This also applies if the spouse did not sign an amended return.

There can be a binding originally filed joint return even if one spouse failed to sign the return, if the parties intended to file a joint return. Thus, one must examine the parties intentions to ascertain whether the absence of one signature invalidated the return. See Federbush v. Commissioner, 34 T.C. 740 (1960), aff’d, 325 F.2d 1 (2d Cir.1963). See IRM 25.15.19.2.4.1, Tacit Consent Factors for determining the intent to file a joint return.

If an invalid deficiency assessment or an assessment due to an amended return was made against a non-signing spouse, the IRS may not be able to assess the proper amount against the non-signing spouse because the statute of limitations may have expired based on the originally filed return. See IRM 25.15.19.2.2, Assessment Based on One Signature - Barred Statute One Signature (BSOS), for more information.

IRC 6015 allows for three types of relief:

See IRM 25.15.3, Technical Provisions of IRC 6015, for more details.

See IRM 25.15.5, Relief from Community Property Laws, for details on the IRC 66(c) relief provisions.

IRC 6015 is effective for:

In determining the amount unpaid as of July 22, 1998, use the date (cycle date) of payment when such payment was applied to the account.

Any office other than CCISO receiving a Form 8857, Request for Innocent Spouse Relief, that does not have an open exam or an assigned Status 26 collection case for the RS should date stamp and immediately (within 10 business days) mail or fax the form to:

Taxpayers seeking relief under IRC 6015(b) and IRC 6015(c) must file a request no later than 2 years from the first collection activity occurring after July 22, 1998, against the RS. See IRC 6015(b)(1)(E) and IRC 6015(c)(3)(B). See IRM 25.15.3.5.1, Collection Activity, for a definition of "collection activity." See also REG-132251-11 for more information. For claims filed under IRC 6015(f), the claim is timely as long as the refund statute or collection statute is open. See IRC 6015(f) (2) for more information.

Requests for relief in the form of a refund must also be filed within the normal time frame for filing a claim for refund, which is the refund statute expiration date (RSED). In order to be timely, a claim must be filed within the later of:

Refunds are not permitted under IRC 6015(c). Refunds are permitted under IRC 6015(b) and IRC 6015(f) as long as the RS made payments and the requirements of IRC 6511 have been met.

If there is a power of attorney (POA) on file, (check IDRS Command Code (CC) CFINK) all required contact must be made with the POA and the taxpayer.

If in doubt as to whether the POA is still valid, contact the representative or RS. Restrict communication to obtaining information necessary to determine the validity of the POA. If uncertainty involves a dispute between or among recognized representatives of a taxpayer, follow Treas. Reg. 601.508 (IRC 601.508 as reprinted in Publication 216, Conference and Practice Requirements).

IRC 6103(e)(1)(B) permits inspection or disclosure of a joint return, when requested in writing, to either spouse or authorized representative.

IRC 6103(e)(7) permits anyone who is authorized to inspect a return to also receive return information related to the return without written request under IRC 6103(e)(1)(B) if the disclosure would not seriously impair federal tax administration.

IRC 6103(e)(8) provides for disclosures pertaining to deficiencies assessed with respect to persons who have filed jointly but are no longer married or no longer reside in the same household. IRC 6103(e)(8) provides that, upon verbal or written request, certain limited collection information regarding one spouse must be disclosed to the other spouse, in writing or verbally, relative to tax deficiencies with respect to a jointly filed return. Because information provided pursuant to IRC 6103(e)(8) would be otherwise available to either spouse due to IRC 6103(e)(1), and to the extent IRC 6103(e)(7) does not prohibit release, a written or verbal request can be accepted. Written requests can be signed by either spouse or his/her duly authorized attorney-in-fact. Verbal requests can be honored if received from either spouse and/or their authorized attorney-in-fact, after verifying the identity of the person making the request to determine their right to the information. See IRM 11.3.2.4.1.1, Disclosure of Collection Activities with Respect to Joint Returns, for more information.
Pursuant to IRC 6103(e)(8), the following information must be disclosed upon receipt of a proper request from a spouse who has been assessed the joint liability or the spouse’s authorized representative:

Do not disclose the following information:

If a request for information concerning divorced or separated spouses beyond that provided for in IRC 6103(e)(8) is received, the employee may contact the Disclosure Help Desk at 866–591–0860 for guidance. In an appropriate case, the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative may be instructed to make a Freedom of Information Act request.

In general, if relief is denied in whole or in part, the RS may appeal that determination to the IRS Independent Office of Appeals.

If relief is granted in whole or part, the NRS may appeal that determination to the IRS Independent Office of Appels.

See IRM 8.7.12, Technical and Procedural Guidelines - Appeals Innocent Spouse Case Procedures.

Under IRC 6015(e), the RS may petition the Tax Court to determine the appropriate relief available if such petition is filed by the 90th day after the final Notice of Determination denying IRC 6015 relief, or at any time if the claim has been pending for six months and the Service has not made a final determination. If the RS petitions the Tax Court, the NRS is allowed to become a party to the proceeding. See IRC 6015(e)(4).

If a taxpayer petitions for redetermination of a deficiency under IRC 6213(a), the taxpayer may raise IRC 6015 as an affirmative defense.

A taxpayer may raise IRC 6015 in a petition from a notice of determination in a collection due process proceeding under IRC 6320 or IRC 6330 in which the taxpayer raised innocent spouse relief.