Date: July 23, 2024 Contact: newsroom@ci.irs.gov MINNEAPOLIS — A Shakopee man has pleaded guilty to his role in providing a $120,000 bribe to a juror in the Feeding Our Future trial, announced United States Attorney Andrew M. Luger. According to court documents, on April 22, 2024, seven defendants went to trial before U.S. District Judge Nancy E. Brasel for their roles in the Feeding Our Future fraud scheme. During the trial, Abdimajid Mohamed Nur and four others conspired with each other to provide a cash bribe to one of the jurors in exchange for the juror returning a not guilty verdict in the trial. As part of the scheme, Nur and his co-defendants decided to target Juror 52 because she was the youngest juror and they believed her to be the only juror of color. Nur and his co-defendants conducted online research to obtain Juror 52’s personal information, including her home address and information about her background and family members. They conducted surveillance of Juror 52 to confirm her home address and obtain information about Juror 52’s daily habits. Nur recruited his co-defendant, Ladan Ali, to deliver the bribe money to Juror 52. During the trial and at Nur’s direction, Ali flew from Seattle to Minneapolis to meet with Nur and discuss the plan to bribe Juror 52. Ali agreed to deliver the bribe money to Juror 52 in exchange for a $150,000 cash payment. According to court documents, on May 30, 2024, Ali flew from Seattle to Minneapolis to carry out the bribery scheme. On May 31, 2024, at the direction of Nur, Ali attempted to follow Juror 52 home as she left a downtown Minneapolis parking ramp at the conclusion of the first day of closing arguments in the trial. Nur had previously provided Ali with a photo of Juror 52’s car and a map of the parking ramp. According to court documents, on June 1, 2024, Ali told Nur —falsely—that she had approached Juror 52 at a bar and that Juror 52 was interested in taking the bribe but wanted $500,000 in exchange for returning a not guilty verdict. Ali told Nur that Juror 52 wanted Ali to deliver the money at a specific time when Juror 52 would be home alone. In reality, Ali did not speak with Juror 52, and Juror 52 never agreed to accept a bribe. Nevertheless, Nur believed Ali and relayed the information to another co-defendant, Abdiaziz Farah, who said that he would obtain the bribe money. On June 2, 2024, Abdiaziz Farah instructed Nur to meet him at Said Farah’s business, Bushra Wholesalers, to pick up the bribe money. When Nur arrived, Said Farah brought him a cardboard box containing $200,000 in cash to bribe Juror 52. Later that day, Nur met Ali in a parking lot in Bloomington and gave her the cardboard box containing the $200,000 in cash. Ali took the cash out of the box and put it into a Hallmark gift bag. Nur then instructed Ali to meet Abdulkarim Farah at a location near Juror 52’s house. Nur understood that Abdulkarim Farah would accompany Ali to Juror 52’s house and video record her delivery of the bribe as proof that the bribe money was delivered and Juror 52’s acceptance of the bribe. According to court documents, later that night, Nur received the video of Ali delivering the bribe money from Abdulkarim Farah via an encrypted messaging app. Nur later deleted the video in order to conceal his involvement in the bribery scheme. Nur also deleted the encrypted messaging app and other evidence of the scheme from his phone. Nur pleaded guilty today in U.S. District Court before Judge David S. Doty to one count of bribery of a juror. A sentencing hearing will be scheduled at a later time. This case is the result of an investigation conducted by the FBI with assistance from IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS CI), the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Joseph H. Thompson, Matthew Ebert, Harry Jacobs, Chelsea Walcker, and Daniel Bobier are prosecuting the case. CI is the criminal investigative arm of the IRS, responsible for conducting financial crime investigations, including tax fraud, narcotics trafficking, money-laundering, public corruption, healthcare fraud, identity theft and more. CI special agents are the only federal law enforcement agents with investigative jurisdiction over violations of the Internal Revenue Code, obtaining a more than a 90 percent federal conviction rate. The agency has 20 field offices located across the U.S. and 12 attaché posts abroad.
